Women – Still a Long Way from Economic Equality

 The CLC today released – on the eve of International Women’s Day – a major report on women and economic equality.   I’ll be presenting it at the PEF meetings in June.

The report flags a question which is not posed often or clearly enough – why has the pay (and wider opportunity) gap between women and men stopped closing over the past decade or so, even though women are dropping out of the labour force to care for children for much shorter periods of time, and even though younger women now hold a significant educational advantage over men?

It would help to have a more rigorous analysis and decomposition of causes – but I see the key reasons as follows:

– Men still hugely predominate in the very best-paid, mainly private sector jobs – where wage growth has been highly concentrated.  Likely one factor excluding women here has been the pressure to very long work hours, which works against women who take even short leaves from work or want to work more social hours.

– The entry  of a much higher proportion of women into professional jobs is very tightly bound up with the growth of the public sector.  Meanwhile, precarious, low paid private services work remains heavily gendered.
– Hardly a new finding, but the failure to develop affordable child care and other caring services in Canada combined  with few ‘family friendly’ workplace practices militates strongly against the equality of women in the work force. Canada is one of the worst countries in the OECD in terms of the pay gap.


Introduction and Summary

Some people see the issue of economic equality for women as rather outdated, out of tune with a supposed new world of opportunity that has opened up with higher education for women and a more equal division of work between women and men. Yet the fact of the matter is that, after many years of progress through the 1970s and 1980s, the gender wage gap in Canada has remained stuck since the mid 1990s at one of the highest levels in the advanced industrial world.

In 2005, the most recent year for which we have figures, women working full-time for the full year earned an average of $39,200, or 70.5% as much as comparable men who earned an average of $55,700. In the mid 1990s, such women earned 72% as much as men. The pay gap is even greater for university-educated women, who earned just 68% as much as men in 2005, down from 75% a decade ago. The gender pay gap in Canada is the fifth greatest in the advanced industrial (OECD) countries and even bigger than in the US.

Strikingly, the pay gap has grown rather than narrowed even as women have become more highly educated than men, and even as most women have decided to have fewer children, later in life. Fully half of women aged 25 to 44 now have a post secondary qualification, compared to 40% of men, and the education gap is even bigger among young people. Women are participating in the paid labour force at higher levels than ever before, and very few women now drop out of paid work for very extended periods of time. But, the pay gap persists and grows.

One key reason for the gender wage gap is that women without high levels of education (or whose credentials are unrecognized in Canada) are much more likely than men to be employed in very low-paid and insecure, part-time and temporary jobs, especially in private sector sales and service jobs. More than one in five women aged 25 to 54, the peak earnings years, make less than $12 per hour, almost double the proportion of men. Working women, especially recent immigrant women of colour, have suffered most from the failure of governments to maintain adequate minimum wages and employment standards to protect low paid and precarious workers.

When it comes to better-paid jobs, women are still largely excluded from blue collar jobs, especially in the skilled trades. But a large and growing layer of women have indeed moved into professional and skilled technical jobs, in education, health care and other community and public services. But these women are still paid less than comparable men, and are significantly under-represented in very well-paid jobs. More than three in four of the earners making at least $89,000 per year (the top 5% of the Canadian workforce) are men, and men are still three times more likely than women to be senior managers.

Public services employ 29% of all women compared to 17% of men (and the gap is even greater if we take account of the community social services sector.) Women have, accordingly, borne most of the impacts of privatization and contracting-out to the private sector, where wages are lower and wage gaps are much greater. Pay equity laws can make a difference, but attempts to equalize wages between male and female-dominated job classifications have generally stalled even though discrimination remains apparent.


  • This winter I’ve been trying to get some women interested in joing a political party with almost no interest . Perhaps I lack the necessary charm ? But if women actually want to close the inequality gap , they have to step up , get involved , get elected and be heard in positions in all levels of government . Until that happens , the inequality will continue . More than 50% of eligible voters won’t have much of a voice where it counts .

  • I have been in the compensation field off and on since 1995. One of the things I learned fairly early is that there tend to be “eras” where we swing back and forth between external equity (i.e. market competitiveness) and internal equity (i.e. job evaluation and pay equity). Right now, we are clearly in an external equity era, and that has been going on more or less for over a decade. However, built into the internal mechanisms of human resources and labour relations, is an inevitable swinging of the pendulum. For this reason, we should be expecting a resurgence in the focus on internal equity within the next few years.

    Of course, in order to know this you would probably have to talk to someone in HR.

  • Canada unfortunately is one of the unprogressive countries in the world were womens rights are concerned, it is a shame really, since many immigrants including my own parents had previously enjoyed the freedoms and benefits of this country in the mid 70’s , which unfortunately in the past decade has followed a shallow Americanized version of exploiting and demoralizing women, I hope this changes in the next year or I will be looking to some of the more progressive EU countries to support my own personal vision and plan as an independent and highly educated, confident woman in 2009, which only further adds to the brain drain this country is experiencing and can’t afford in this econmony, women have statistically proven to add more profit and value to a company, but it remains a hidden truth in Canada.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *