David Orchard and Dion-omics
Earlier today, the Prime Minister announced that four by-elections will be held on March 17. Earlier this week, a most fascinating controversy emerged in one of the affected ridings: Desnethe-Missinippi-Churchill River (northern Saskatchewan).
David Orchard, the Saskatchewan-based activist whose grassroots organization helped Dion win the Liberal leadership, has declared his candidacy for the Liberal nomination. However, Ralph Goodale is pushing for Dion to instead appoint Joan Beatty, who was just re-elected as a provincial NDP MLA, as the Liberal by-election candidate.
The Globe and Mail identifies two possible motivations. First, “Goodaleâ€™s free-market policy leanings clash with the reputation of Mr. Orchard, who campaigned against free trade with the U.S.” Second, he does not want to risk Orchard challenging his position as the Boss Hogg of Liberal politics in Saskatchewan.
Randy Burton of the Saskatoon StarPhoenix identifies the same two factors: “It may be that Goodale doesnâ€™t want the Liberal brand to be confused with Orchardsâ€™ long-standing concerns about free trade and what that might do to the Liberalsâ€™ chances with the business community. . . . It may also be that Goodale doesnâ€™t want to be supplanted as the provinceâ€™s most influential Liberal should Orchard wind up getting elected to Parliament.”
This situation will provide an interesting test of Dionâ€™s supposedly progressive credentials. Will he appoint mild-mannered Beatty simply to foreclose the possibility of a rabble-rousing economic populist winning the Liberal nomination vote?
Another point is that, if the Liberals had any semblance of a grassroots organization rather than just an electoral machine, they would not need to frequently appoint candidates to prevent outside agitators from “taking over” nominations.
Finally, as someone who sees the NDP as a grassroots movement worth supporting rather than just asÂ a convenient electoral vehicle in northern Saskatchewan, I find Beattyâ€™s public musings about whether to run as a New Democrats or as a Liberal disconcerting.
The Liberals need still more reform if their tent isn’t big enough to accommodate David Orchard. It’s simply a scandal that the FTA and NAFTA have never been reviewed, as first allowed for in–was it really 1987? Both agreements are obviously unfair to Canada in some ways, so Orchard and his supporters have a point that needs addressing by any gov’t that claims to represent the people. Democracy can be so inconvenient once you view it from a seat in the House– hence the enduring appeal of this particular populist.
If what’s being reported is true, Goodale’s attitude must be upsetting for Dion; he spoke out so vigorously when the Cons attacked the Wheat Board and likely agrees wholeheartedly with Orchard on this major (as in megabucks) issue.
As someone who also sees the NDP as a grassroots movement worth supporting, I wouldn’t be too sad to see Beatty go. Like Dosanjh, she sounds like an opportunist and a careerist, unless the article you link to misrepresents her musings. The federal Liberal party is the natural home of opportunists and careerists.
I’m endlessly amazed by David Orchard’s denial of how left he really is… If the Grits do decide that the route to go is an appointment from on high then perhaps he’ll realize he does belong in the NDP.
oh calm down. we’re all on the same bloody progressively-minded team.
it was about ensuring women are representing 1/3 of the federal ridings, not economics. orchard will get his riding somewhere.