Wayne Fraser on Employment Insurance

Saturday’s Toronto Star featured the following op-ed from the United Steelworkers’ Ontario-Atlantic Director:

Fix EI system to help those who didn’t cause the crisis

Federal government, coalition or minority, should bolster benefits for the unemployed

December 13, 2008

As all Canadians familiar with front-page drama know, a month and a half from now could produce a new coalition federal government in our country, or we could see a federal budget that does the right thing.

Either way, a month and a half is too long when what Canadians really need is a significant change in direction and, most urgently, immediate measures to help those most seriously affected by unemployment and poverty.

No one knows for sure how bad our economic situation will get, but hundreds of thousands more unemployed Canadians are a real likelihood over the next two years. For the Harper government, more unemployment is an acceptable price for remaining true to “free” trade principles and preserving globalization in times of recession.

But while whoever is in charge is handing out billions of dollars, we must make sure that laid-off workers and their families are not forgotten.

Our federal government must do right by those who are most vulnerable. Specifically, the country’s Employment Insurance system should be radically improved so that it does what it ought to do: help workers maintain a decent standard of living and their dignity during tough times.

Canadians know that more than $50 billion of EI contributions have been diverted from the EI fund and are being used to help Ottawa boast about its supposed fiscal responsibility. It is far from greedy to ask for some of that money back. Workers’ contributions have made EI possible. They paid in and now it’s time for them to be paid back. Here is our five-point plan:

  • Let’s do away with the two-week waiting period before workers receive their cheque or bank deposit. What justifies this measure anyway? Do landlords, when they learn that their tenants have been laid-off, come cheerfully by to announce, “Don’t worry about November’s rent. I know you’re waiting”? Certainly those who collect the gas bill aren’t so charitable.
  • Let’s get benefits to a livable level and also increase the maximum allowable earnings before the clawbacks kick in. In 2007, the average weekly benefit for someone on EI was $317.65. Who do politicians think they are kidding, countenancing that level of economic desperation for others, when they would never accept such a situation for themselves? Consider that, since the maximum benefit lasts some 45 weeks, the most that such an average beneficiary could get is $14,294.25. With the poverty line pegged at around $24,000 per annum, that’s simply shameful.
  • We demand that benefits be extended to two years. Decent jobs, jobs to feed a family on, are not growing on trees. They will become scarcer still in the coming months (if not years). Out of work through no fault of their own, Canadians should have a decent income for the time it takes them to find adequate employment.
  • Let’s exclude severance pay from the calculation of worker eligibility. In an era when huge quantities of aid are handed out to the powerful with limited strings attached, we ought to stop measuring and begrudging every dime transferred to those without work. Let workers access their EI right away and use their severance to meet other pressing needs. We don’t expect laid-off workers to sell their homes or empty their savings accounts before they can receive EI, so why should we demand that they use their severance pay?
  • Finally, the government must loosen eligibility criteria in order to make EI accessible to greater numbers. No system can be said to serve the unemployed when it denies benefits to a majority trapped, for example, in part-time, seasonal or stop-and-go temporary work. Before 1996, workers only needed 150 insurable hours of work to qualify for benefits. In today’s Canadian cities, they typically need to have put in well over 600 hours on the job in the previous year in order to take advantage of a program they helped fund. That’s far from good enough.

The government, whether it’s a coalition or not, needs to show some real leadership in making sure that any stimulus package protects the interests of all the stakeholders in our society, including working people and their families. The coalition has already indicated that EI improvement would figure in its agenda. That’s welcome news. But regardless of who is in charge, now is the time for the feds to show some compassion and do the right thing.
Wayne Fraser is the director for Ontario and the Atlantic provinces of the United Steelworkers Union.

4 comments

  • Has anyone been able to put some numbers to this? I think this is the sort of thing we should be focusing on, but it’d be nice to see how it would fit into a broader package.

  • Changes need to happen and with a 2% GDP margin of spending green light, its time for action on this segment of the population who needs a fix given the breakdown.

    Of course with our parliament hiding out in the deifenbunker, we won;t see any changes like this until at least march and if the tories are not challenged on the budget we will most likely see small changes.

    The tories stated Friday that we don’t need to panic, apparently we need to think about all our options. Well let me say that we have plenty of time now for thinking seeing we have our government in hiding. Tell those on the unemployment line that we don’t need to panic. I keep getting mixed signals on the tory line. At one moment we hear them say that they seen these economic challenge coming last year and hence the tax cuts. But when you press them for ideas on change, they state that they need more time and more fact finding, as this is all new and we need to assess more.

    EI is not something one has to think about, scrap th two weeks and increase the pay out to something one can actually live on and make a transition towards new work. The current system is a joke and we all have known this for a long time. We scene the stats and the way people dropped out of EI, for some right wingers apparently this was a victory over cost cutting. To me and I am sure other progressives it was but another beat down on the working class. An awfully mean nasty blow to those least able to absorb such a blow. Nothing doing it on the backs of workers, our politicians seen so astutely capable when it comes to solving problems on the backs of workers. (auto crisis)

    I must say the words coming out of Flaherty and Harper are so pathetically loaded with BS and double talk one wonders how they will ever be able to produce a budget that will not see a coalition in place come late January.

    EI needs to be changed and we have a whole bag full of proposed and costed out over the past few years. I believe the AFB had some numbers for several different scenarios of EI changes.

  • A costed EI package will be in the forthcoming CCPA stimulus package

  • I have’nt been on employment insurance in quite awhile, bu, I’d t the way i understand it if i went on welfarebe making almost as much, plus they would have some kind of health coverage for prescriptions and such, seems kind of stupid to me after paying e.i. insurance for so many years, that your penalized for it by having to wait for 2 weeks (which you would’nt on welfare) plus 1 1/2 to 2 mths for a cheaque (again no waiting period). Seems like there is something wrong with this picture.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.