Main menu:

Posts by Author

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The End of Men?

The Globe and Mail on Saturday devoted two pages of its Focus section to a discussion of Hanna Rosin’s book, The End of Men.

There are a few interesting anecdotes on changing sex roles, but there are no facts cited to substantiate the argument that North America is seeing the rise of a matriarchy as women have displaced men in powerful and well-paid jobs and as men take on more work in the household.

Sure, things have changed a lot since the 1970s, but not so much recently if you look at the Canadian stats.

Women earn more than men in less than one in three dual earner families, and that proportion has been only very slowly inching up since the mid 1990s.

Younger adult women work less hours than than men, mainly because they continue to have the primary responsibility for child care and other work in the home. The proportion of women age 25 to 44 with jobs is about six percentage points less than for men, and one in five women in this age group work part-time compared to just one in sixteen men.

And the pay gap between women and men has not been closing lately. Women working full year on a full time basis earn just 71% as much as men, the same proportion as in the mid 1990s.

In short, we are still very far from economic equality for women, let alone a matriarchy.

Comments

Comment from John Richmond
Time: September 12, 2012, 8:04 am

Thanks for this. Could not agree more. Trotting out the “men are loosing out” line has been around as a tried and true right wing tactic for a long time. Meanwhile my “liberal” neighbour asks me if I want my daughters to “marry young or older” and my teen age daughter and her friends are discussing when to get married, how to get married, and how to marry someone “with money just in case you don’t want to work”. Change? What change? Hellooo, looks to me like we are going backward.

Comment from Bryan
Time: September 14, 2012, 11:59 am

Well Rockefeller based interest groups have been behind the “end of men”. With a male and female out of the house the state adds to the tax based and then children look to the state (school) as a parental figure.

See Henry Makow site …

Write a comment





Related articles