Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Mobility pricing must be fair and equitable for all April 12, 2018
    As Metro Vancouver’s population has grown, so have its traffic congestion problems. Whether it’s a long wait to cross a bridge or get on a bus, everyone can relate to the additional time and stress caused by a transportation system under strain. Mobility pricing is seen as a solution to Metro Vancouver’s transportation challenges with […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Budget 2018: The Most Disappointing Budget Ever March 14, 2018
    Premier Pallister’s Trump-esque statement that budget 2018 was going to be the “best budget ever” has fallen a bit flat. Instead of a bold plan to deal with climate change, poverty and our crumbling infrastructure, we are presented with two alarmist scenarios to justify further tax cuts and a lack of decisive action: the recent […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2018 Federal Budget Analysis February 14, 2018
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis Some baby steps for dad and big steps forward for women, by Kate McInturff (CCPA) An ambition constrained budget, by David Macdonald (CCPA) Five things […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • With regional management BC’s iconic forest industry can benefit British Columbians rather than multinational corporations January 17, 2018
    Forests are one of the iconic symbols of British Columbia, and successive governments and companies operating here have largely focussed on the cheap, commodity lumber business that benefits industry. Former provincial forestry minister Bob Williams, who has been involved with the industry for five decades, proposes regional management of this valuable natural resource to benefit […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The End of Men?

The Globe and Mail on Saturday devoted two pages of its Focus section to a discussion of Hanna Rosin’s book, The End of Men.

There are a few interesting anecdotes on changing sex roles, but there are no facts cited to substantiate the argument that North America is seeing the rise of a matriarchy as women have displaced men in powerful and well-paid jobs and as men take on more work in the household.

Sure, things have changed a lot since the 1970s, but not so much recently if you look at the Canadian stats.

Women earn more than men in less than one in three dual earner families, and that proportion has been only very slowly inching up since the mid 1990s.

Younger adult women work less hours than than men, mainly because they continue to have the primary responsibility for child care and other work in the home. The proportion of women age 25 to 44 with jobs is about six percentage points less than for men, and one in five women in this age group work part-time compared to just one in sixteen men.

And the pay gap between women and men has not been closing lately. Women working full year on a full time basis earn just 71% as much as men, the same proportion as in the mid 1990s.

In short, we are still very far from economic equality for women, let alone a matriarchy.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from John Richmond
Time: September 12, 2012, 8:04 am

Thanks for this. Could not agree more. Trotting out the “men are loosing out” line has been around as a tried and true right wing tactic for a long time. Meanwhile my “liberal” neighbour asks me if I want my daughters to “marry young or older” and my teen age daughter and her friends are discussing when to get married, how to get married, and how to marry someone “with money just in case you don’t want to work”. Change? What change? Hellooo, looks to me like we are going backward.

Comment from Bryan
Time: September 14, 2012, 11:59 am

Well Rockefeller based interest groups have been behind the “end of men”. With a male and female out of the house the state adds to the tax based and then children look to the state (school) as a parental figure.

See Henry Makow site …

Write a comment





Related articles