Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

More on Declining Labour Force Participation

As a supplement to the excellent (and more timely!) posts from Andrew and Erin this morning, let me add a few points on the most striking feature of today’s Labour Force Survey: namely, the accelerating decline in labour force participation.

The part rate (seasonally adjusted) fell to 66.5% of the working age population (remember, Stats Can defines working age broadly as everyone over 15).  This continues a trend toward falling participation since the recession hit.  The pre-recession peak participation rate was 67.8% (reached in spring 2008).

That 1.3-point decline in the participation rate is equivalent to the loss of 366,000 potential workers from Canada’s labour force — compared to what it would have been had the pre-recession participation rate been maintained. 

This is a key reason why the official unemployment rate vastly understates the true degree of slackness in the labour market.  If those post-recession non-participants were included in the labour force, the unemployment rate would be 9.2 percent (instead of the official 7.4 percent).  Throw in involuntary part-time employment and other indicators of underutilization, and it’s clear that Canada’s true unemployment rate is well into the double digits.

The February participation rate was the lowest since March 2002 (a decade ago).  And it was no higher than the participation rate in1987 (a generation ago).  That means a quarter-century of rising participation (driven largely by women’s formal participation) has been squandered by the crisis and subsequent non-recovery.

It’s common for participation rates to decline in the wake of a recession and subsequent slow recovery.  In the early 1990s, for example, the participation rate fell by over 2 points until the jobs recovery really took hold in the last part of that decade.

Canadians aren’t stupid: if there are no jobs, they won’t “actively seek” them, hence they disappear from the labour market.  That brings down the official unemployment rate (convenient for politicians).  But the crucial test for society is whether people are working and producing, or not.  By that score, the languishing employment rate (now back down to 61.6%, just a smidge above the mid-recession trough of 61.3% … and far below the pre-recession peak of 63.8%) is hard proof that Canadian workers continue to face a recession — with a capital ‘R’.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from T Manderly
Time: March 10, 2012, 2:15 pm

But this is is only a recesission for the middle class…the rich are doing great!

Comment from T Manderly
Time: March 10, 2012, 2:18 pm

During the Great Depression….many rich folks made a fortune off the fact that people would work insanely hard for any wage…

It was fake…Human Resource strategy to bring the middle class to heel…work hard for nothing.. Much like now…

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 11, 2012, 1:16 pm

“During the Great Depression….many rich folks made a fortune off the fact that people would work insanely hard for any wage”

During the Great Depression….many folks watched prices collapse; worked for wages less then 4$ an hour. Many folk saved pennies because of Deflation. Prices for Energy, Food, Shelter, Education collapsed.

Today the middle class will be wiped out by rising or increasing prices for basic necessities. Food, Energy, Education, Fees for maintainence, or insurance. Housing is in a bubble, it will collapse in price. We will be faced with stagflation of the 70s where falling prices for items as Housing will not offset rising prices elsewhere due to the amount of private debt accumulated during this recession. Housing can only be an offset for rising prices for Canadian’s who have no mortgage debt; who would be effected quite differently. By the way wages today have not matched prices in general, the gap is larger for the basics. Inflation is wreaked havoc over the middle class.

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 11, 2012, 1:19 pm

Housing can only be an offset for rising prices for Canadian’s who have no mortgage debt; who would be effected quite differently by 5%, 10%, 15% to greater drop in home prices.***

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 11, 2012, 1:31 pm

Canadians with mortgage debt will become slaughtered as falling prices tied to their debtload which doesn’t decrease, as they watch prices rise for the cost of just living a day. Thats my future. Our future.

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 11, 2012, 1:37 pm

I do not see deflation for all prices at all till higher interest rates are enacted by the bank of Canada since they cant stay low indefinitely creating negative rates of interest. I think these rates are unwarranted, and have been for sometime encouraging to many young canadians into a housing market accumulating debt they cannot afford when rates reset much higher a few years from now, wether they locked in current rates, or not.

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 11, 2012, 1:43 pm

The fact participantion rate is so, can imply we currently our still contracting, that there is no recovery.

Comment from Business Mind
Time: March 12, 2012, 11:31 am

Lower labor force rate aren’t signifies unemployment maybe the technology are progressively develop to reduced labor force. But it doesn’t mean that unemployment goes up, it just people are now find a new career.

Comment from Andrew
Time: March 12, 2012, 3:34 pm

Er, working age is age 15 to 64, not over 15. Which strengthens your argument since decline of the part rate is not due to an aging workforce.

Comment from MikeB
Time: March 13, 2012, 11:34 am

Jim: Wanted to say great job with your appearance on TVO agenda regarding Ontario jobs. I especially like your comment about the deficit not really existing if growth had kept on trend.

Jim, Erin, Andrew: Great work with the comments in general, I hope someone is listening. Couple of things:

1. Structural unemployment: I heard the structural argument rolled out again this past week. I know you’ve addressed this before, I wonder why it is so strong. I’ve applied to lots of jobs I am 90% qualified for. It seems to me employers want the “perfect” new employee able to generate profits for them with no work needed on their end. How did this become such a one way street. Did employers not play a role in training in the past?

2. Research: Related to #1, it seems that we now want to privatize the profits from NRC research. Is this just a matter of keep asking until they say no. I understand that commercial success benefits all of us, but wasn’t business able to do this for itself once upon a time (before government got so big :))

3. Productivity: We are all ready able to produce far more than we need with much less than full employment. Why do we keep harping on productivity? Especially, why does a TD Banker (TVO Agenda) keep bringing it up, seems they don’t produce much of any use, but create lots of great risk.

4. Deficit and Growth: Do you think Canada’s shrinking deficit and the USA’s growing deficit in January have anything to do with the respective job numbers we’ve been seeing?

5. Federal Budget: We’ve already got lots of unemployment, how can we reasonably believe that people losing their government jobs will be “absorbed” by the private sector.

Sorry, bit of a rant. I realize that we are mostly on the same page here at PEF.

Comment from Doc Manderly
Time: March 15, 2012, 2:43 pm

Brandon…they are some differences but ultimately we are currently in the Great Depression 2.0

A situation where everyone wil work themselves to the bone for almost nothing…

To the benefit of the rich who are intent on crushing the
middle class into serf level poverty to add to their vast
fortunes…

It all comes down to the downward wage spiral…which kills purchasing power….which kills jobs…..which kills purchasing power…which kills jobs…ad infinitum…

As soon as fair wages are implemented thenstart matching costs, then, this “recession”
Is over…

Comment from Doc Manderly
Time: March 15, 2012, 2:46 pm

Fair living wages that match living costs are the key to ending…this “recession” for average Canadian families….

Comment from Doc Manderly
Time: March 15, 2012, 2:52 pm

Comment from Doc Manderly 
Time: March 15, 2012, 2:43 pm

Brandon…they are some differences but ultimately we are currently in the Great Depression 2.0

A situation where everyone will work themselves to the bone for almost nothing…

To the benefit of the rich who are intent on crushing the 
middle class into serf level poverty to add to their vast
fortunes…

It all comes down to the downward wage spiral…which kills purchasing power….which kills jobs…..which kills purchasing power…which kills jobs…ad infinitum…

As soon as fair living wages are implemented that match costs, then, this middle class only“recession”
 is over!

Just like Canada did in the post WW2  period…

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 16, 2012, 10:05 pm

Fair living wages that match living costs…which will only lead to higher living costs..we will need…New Fair Living Wages…..to match new living costs. That is not a soluting ever-increasing prices Doc Manderly, or ending a rescession.

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 16, 2012, 10:06 pm

Canada post worl war 2, we were still on a gold standard, and a gallon of gas was less then 18 cents, there was massive deflation. Then compared today adjust for inflation.

Comment from Brandon L
Time: March 16, 2012, 10:13 pm

Again it is The Great Depression 2.0.

Doc, and T Mandeerly, it however will be the greatest inflationary depression for economits to write future books, and essays for years to come.

Example we wont have dreaded deflation untill the US Treasury Secretary Timmy Geithner defualts on US debt, where every dollar in USD you have, you get 10 cent back. Then, yes, The Great Depression of Deflation would occur. Which wont happen till after the US defualts.

The US participation is also a shell of its former self, implying no recovery.

Comment from Mike
Time: March 21, 2012, 12:59 pm

Brandon L.,
the U.S. will never default because of a ‘real’ structural impediment. It has a sovereign currency and therefore it’s impossible for it to ever be insolvent (sounds crazy at firtst but look into Modern Monetary Theory for a full explanattion).
The only way the U.S. could ever default is due to a political decision which would be likely if the Tea partiers ever take control of Congress.

Write a comment





Related articles