Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • CCPA in Europe for CETA speaking tour October 17, 2017
    On September 21, Canada and the European Union announced that the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a controversial NAFTA-plus free trade deal initiated by the Harper government and signed by Prime Minister Trudeau in 2016, was now provisionally in force. In Europe, however, more than 20 countries have yet to officially ratify the deal, […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Twelve year study of an inner-city neighbourhood October 12, 2017
    What does twelve years of community organizing look like for a North End Winnipeg neighbourhood?  Jessica Leigh survey's those years with the Dufferin community from a community development lens.  Read full report.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Losing your ID - even harder to recover when you have limited resources! October 10, 2017
    Ellen Smirl researched the barriers experienced by low-income Manitobans when faced with trying to replace lost, stolen, or never aquired idenfication forms. Read full report here.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA recommendations for a better North American trade model October 6, 2017
    The all-party House of Commons trade committee is consulting Canadians on their priorities for bilateral and trilateral North American trade in light of the current renegotiation of NAFTA. In the CCPA’s submission to this process, Scott Sinclair, Stuart Trew, and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood argue for a different kind of trading relationship that is inclusive, transformative, and […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Ontario’s fair wage policy needs to be refreshed September 28, 2017
    The Ontario government is consulting on ways to modernize the province’s fair wage policy, which sets standards for wages and working conditions for government contract workers such as building cleaners, security guards, building trades and construction workers. The fair wage policy hasn’t been updated since 1995, but the labour market has changed dramatically since then. […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The Politics of Potash

Advocates of low potash royalties are claiming that New Democrats fared poorly in Saskatchewan’s recent election because they proposed higher potash royalties. Of course, potash companies and their boosters would like the NDP to give up this cause. Doing so would be a political mistake for the party and a disservice to the people of Saskatchewan.

Most polling indicates that most Saskatchewan residents support collecting more from potash companies. So, why didn’t the NDP get more traction on the issue? In politics, timing can be everything.

BHP Billiton’s bid to take over the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan was a golden opportunity for the provincial NDP. The takeover battle focused public attention on potash and underscored loopholes in Saskatchewan’s royalty regime that would have been even more advantageous to BHP than to PotashCorp.

The field was clear for the NDP to propose that whichever multinational corporation operates the mines should pay higher royalties for the resource (as I suggested). Unfortunately, the party leadership chose to narrowly focus on the takeover question, which was fully eclipsed by Premier Wall’s public rejection of BHP’s bid.

The NDP started making the case for reviewing and increasing royalties a few months later. By then, no one was paying attention and Wall had already positioned himself as Saskatchewan’s potash champion.

Even with better handling of the potash file, the NDP almost certainly would still have lost the provincial election. Nevertheless, Wall’s Saskatchewan Party correctly perceived that potash royalties are a strong issue for New Democrats.

Rather than defending low royalties on their own terms, the Sask Party responded by loudly asserting that the province already has the highest potash royalties in the world. (As I again noted last week in the following letter, this claim is not supported by any verifiable evidence and misses the point that Saskatchewan has the world’s richest potash reserves.)

In a desperate effort to distract from PotashCorp’s third-quarter earnings, the Sask Party put out more press releases that day than on any other day of the election campaign. Following a single missive on potash, it sought to change the channel to wind, the federal gun registry and starting school after Labour Day.

The Sask Party wants to avoid a focused debate on potash royalties. New Democrats should advance this debate over the next four years.

Potash: low returns

The Leader-Post, Nov. 8, 2011

John Findlay’s Nov. 5 letter notes that it has been “stated many times that our potash industry pays the highest taxes and royalties in the world.” Unfortunately, repetition is not a form of evidence.

PotashCorp and its apologists have presented no publicly-available comparison of potash royalties in different jurisdictions. They sometimes cite the CRU Potash Cost Report, a document inaccessible to anyone who has not paid CRU’s subscription fee of $24,000.

The Ministry of Energy and Resources’ annual report indicates that Saskatchewan’s Crown royalty and potash production tax amounted to only five per cent of potash sales last year. Saskatchewan people should charge a higher price for the world’s richest potash reserves. Collecting the best possible return on provincial resources is just good business, not “socialist hate.”

– Erin Weir, Regina (Weir is an economist, Canadian National Office, United Steelworkers).

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from travis fast
Time: November 15, 2011, 7:24 am

Interesting that the Conservatives in Newfoundland and Labrador and the paid pundits have been claiming the same thing about the royalty regime there. I wonder if it is not time to move towards a Danish strategy which looks to target 60% of the take through their fiscal regime.

Too bad the feds threw you under a bus and forced you to sell potash. Too bad the government of the day was not willing to provoke a constitutional crisis to keep it.

Write a comment





Related articles