Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Corporate Tax Giveaway to the U.S.

A few months ago, I tore a strip off Barrie McKenna’s column on internal trade. But today I write to praise his column on corporate taxes:

U.S.-based companies . . . are taxed by the Internal Revenue Service on their global income. So any profits they don’t reinvest and try to repatriate are hit with the higher U.S. rate, not the Canadian rate.

“The lower tax rate makes their profits look better in Canada, but that just means they are taxed more in the United States,” [Jayson] Myers explained.

“There’s no direct impact on U.S. subsidiaries operating here.”

Of course, that fact will be familiar to readers of this blog.

When questioned, Myers admits that “It is a big issue.” So big, apparently, that he forgot to mention it at all in his 33-page report on corporate taxes earlier this month. Myers even compared Canadian and American corporate tax rates without acknowledging how they interact for US-based companies.

McKenna deserves credit for raising an issue that corporate-tax cutters would rather ignore. However, his conclusion seems slightly off the mark: “Making a country that’s good for business is a lot more complicated than shifting the business tax rate a few percentage points, and both parties would be wise to duke it out over something else.”

McKenna’s headline is correct: “Corporate tax cut dispute bit of a yawn for U.S. businesses.” But that does not mean Canadians should yawn about losing billions of dollars of corporate tax revenue. The fact that much of this revenue is simply being transferred to the US treasury should embolden the opposition parties to duke it out over corporate taxes.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Spell It Out For Me
Time: January 31, 2011, 4:45 pm

So, could someone do the math on this for me/us:

If “26 per cent of corporate profits and 30 per cent of revenues [from Corps doing biz in Canada annually] were in the hands of foreign companies …[and] Roughly half th[at] foreign ownership is American,”

does that mean that, what, about 13% of the $3-B less per year in taxes from the corp. profits here will be subject to the roughly 35% in combined corp. profits in the US…

so (multiplying those out), 0.1365-B or $136-M annually would be going straight to the US Treasuries rather than trickling down to shareholders?

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: February 1, 2011, 11:10 am

To do the math that way, you would need to factor out the profits of Crown corporations (which are largely exempt from corporate tax) and profits taxed at the small-business rate. American corporations account for more than 13% of the profits taxed at Canada’s general rate.

The figures that McKenna appears to be using indicate that American corporations had operating profits of $43.1 billion in Canada in 2007. If the US maintains its 35% federal corporate tax rate and Canada cuts its combined rate to 25% (15% federal plus 10% provincial), then the US government would ultimately collect 10% of those profits (35% minus 25%).

So, when the corporate tax cuts are fully implemented, the treasury transfer could be $4.3 billion annually. Restoring Canada’s federal rate to 18% (versus 15%) would recoup about $1.3 billion (3% of $43.1 billion). So, of the $6 billion in annual Canadian revenue lost by cutting from 18% to 15%, $1.3 billion goes to the US treasury.

I emphasize that these calculations are estimates. But they provide a sense of the issue’s magnitude.

Write a comment





Related articles