Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Help us build a better Ontario September 14, 2017
    If you live in Ontario, you may have recently been selected to receive our 2017 grassroots poll on vital issues affecting the province. Your answers to these and other essential questions will help us decide what issues to focus on as we head towards the June 2018 election in Ontario. For decades, the CCPA has […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Does the Site C dam make economic sense for BC? August 31, 2017
    Today CCPC-BC senior economist Marc Lee submitted an analysis to the BC Utilities Commission in response to their consultation on the economics of the Site C dam. You can read it here. In short, the submission discussses how the economic case for Site C assumes that industrial demand for electricity—in particular for natural gas extraction […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Ontario's middle and working class families are losing ground August 15, 2017
    Ontario is becoming more polarized as middle and working class families see their share of the income pie shrinking while upper middle and rich families take home even more. New research from CCPA-Ontario Senior Economist Sheila Block reveals a staggering divide between two labour markets in the province: the top half of families continue to pile […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Join us in October for the CCPA-BC fundraising gala, featuring Senator Murray Sinclair August 14, 2017
    We are incredibly honoured to announce that Senator Murray Sinclair will address our 2017 Annual Gala as keynote speaker, on Thursday, October 19 in Vancouver. Tickets are now on sale. Will you join us? Senator Sinclair has served as chair of the Truth and Reconciliation Commission (TRC), was the first Indigenous judge appointed in Manitoba, […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • How to make NAFTA sustainable, equitable July 19, 2017
    Global Affairs Canada is consulting Canadians on their priorities for, and concerns about, the planned renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In CCPA’s submission to this process, Scott Sinclair, Stuart Trew and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood point out how NAFTA has failed to live up to its promise with respect to job and productivity […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Reversing Harper’s Corporate Tax Cuts

Last week, I argued that discussions about reversing tax cuts should not be limited to the GST. To advance this debate, I have crunched some numbers on corporate taxes using federal budget documents and tax expenditure reports.

Budget 2009 (see Table A2.2 on page 255) indicates that federal corporate tax cuts since 2006 will reduce annual revenue by $14.9 billion in 2013-14. (By comparison, the two points removed from the GST will cost a little less: $14.6 billion.)

Taking Finance Canada’s numbers as given, the federal government could collect an additional $47.7 billion over the next four fiscal years by reversing all of Harper’s corporate tax cuts. By 2013-14, this approach would add $14.9 billion to annual revenue.

Estimated Cost of Federal Corporate Tax Cuts ($ billion)

 

 2010-11

 2011-12

 2012-13

 2013-14

 General Cut 

 $ 6.7 

 $ 9.1 

 $12.3 

 $13.7 

 Small Business 

 $ 0.9 

 $ 1.0 

 $ 1.1

 $ 1.2 

 Capital Cost 

 $ 1.0 

 $ 0.4 

 $ 0.4 

 $ 0.0 

 Total 

 $ 8.6 

 $10.4 

 $13.8 

 $14.9 

 Cut Below 18%

 $ 0.6 

 $ 2.8 

 $ 5.2 

 $ 5.8 

 

However, this package included reducing the “small business” tax rate from 13.12% in 2007 to 11% since then. No party has the political will to reverse that corporate tax cut.

The package also included accelerated capital cost allowances for computers and manufacturing equipment. These measures are temporary, affordable and targeted to new investment.

By far the most costly measure is slashing the general corporate tax rate from 22.12% in 2007 to 15% in 2012. Simply restoring this rate to its pre-crisis level would generate $41.8 billion over the next four years and regain $13.7 billion of annual revenue by 2013-14.

Another option would be to keep the general corporate tax rate at its 2010 level of 18%, rather than cutting it to 16.5% in 2011 and 15% in 2012. Just maintaining the status quo would save $14.4 billion over the next four fiscal years and $5.8 billion of annual revenue by 2013-14.

In the short-term, funds retained by cancelling corporate tax cuts should be redirected to more effective stimulus, such as targeted tax measures or public works. In the longer-term, restoring the general corporate tax rate to its 2007 level would collect more than enough revenue to wipe out the annual deficit of $11.2 billion that Finance Canada projects for 2013-14.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from ck
Time: February 23, 2010, 3:44 pm

Thanks for that Post.

Now if we can only convince government to not only reinstate corporate taxes, but also close the loopholes that help the rich avoid paying taxes and of course, and of course, give up their taxpayer funded gold plated retirement funds to that the Gen-x ers like myself can actually hope to see retirement ourselves.

Comment from joetoronto
Time: March 5, 2010, 4:15 am

It’s the so called “rich” that feed the country, ck.

These corporations employ people like you so you can pay your bills.

Hard to understand, I know.

Comment from Darwin O’Connor
Time: March 5, 2010, 7:46 pm

Actually people buying goods and services that provide employment. Corporations are mearly middlemen.

Write a comment





Related articles