Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Organizational Responses Canadian Centre for Policy […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Boots Riley in Winnipeg May 11 February 22, 2019
    Founder of the political Hip-Hop group The Coup, Boots Riley is a musician, rapper, writer and activist, whose feature film directorial and screenwriting debut — 2018’s celebrated Sorry to Bother You — received the award for Best First Feature at the 2019 Independent Spirit Awards (amongst several other accolades and recognitions). "[A] reflection of the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA-BC welcomes Emira Mears as new Associate Director February 11, 2019
    This week the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives – BC Office is pleased to welcome Emira Mears to our staff team as our newly appointed Associate Director. Emira is an accomplished communications professional, digital strategist and entrepreneur. Through her former company Raised Eyebrow, she has had the opportunity to work with many organizations in the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Study explores media coverage of pipeline controversies December 14, 2018
    Supporters of fossil fuel infrastructure projects position themselves as friends of working people, framing climate action as antithetical to the more immediately pressing need to protect oil and gas workers’ livelihoods. And as the latest report from the CCPA-BC and Corporate Mapping Project confirms, this framing has become dominant across the media landscape. Focusing on pipeline […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Study highlights ‘uncomfortable truth’ about racism in the job market December 12, 2018
    "Racialized workers in Ontario are significantly more likely to be concentrated in low-wage jobs and face persistent unemployment and earnings gaps compared to white employees — pointing to the “uncomfortable truth” about racism in the job market, according to a new study." Read the Toronto Star's coverage of our updated colour-coded labour market report, released […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Is Layton’s Tax Rate Competitive?

Stéphane Dion has branded Jack Layton an “old-style socialist” with a “job-killing” platform. The C. D. Howe Institute’s Finn Poschmann echoes this view, arguing that corporate tax cuts are needed to keep Canada internationally competitive. (The C. D. Howe Institute is financed and governed by corporate Canada.)

Of course, corporate taxes are but one of many factors that influence competitiveness. Ireland is often cited as an economy built on low corporate taxes. However, as a leading Irish economist noted in the Canadian Tax Journal, “Simplistic conclusions regarding the contribution of tax policy to Ireland’s economic boom are not warranted.”

If anything, the Irish economy took off through targeted support for strategic sectors, rather than through uniformly low tax rates: “the Irish corporate tax system has for long been dualistic, with low rates applicable to export sales (up to 1981) or manufacturing and internationally traded services (post-1981), on the one hand, and a high ‘standard’ rate applicable to the remainder of the corporate sector, on the other.”

However, even if general corporate tax rates were the key factor, the NDP’s plan is internationally competitive. It proposes to continue the general rate of 22.12% and the accelerated capital cost allowance for manufacturing that prevailed in 2007. According to the C. D. Howe Institute’s latest figures, this federal system plus all provincial corporate taxes produced an overall “marginal effective tax rate” of 31.9%. Here’s how that compares with other countries for 2008, including recently completed rate reductions in Italy and Germany:

China – 45.3%
Brazil – 39.1%
India – 37.6%
Korea – 37.1%
United States – 36.0%
France – 35.9%
Japan – 35.0%
NDP Plan for Canada – 31.9%
United Kingdom – 28.7%
Italy – 28.1%
Germany – 27.3%

The NDP platform would situate Canada in the middle of the Group of Seven and well below major emerging markets. The most important comparators are the United States and Japan. Much, if not most, of the internationally-mobile capital in Canada is part of American and Japanese multinational corporations.

Washington and Tokyo tax these corporations on a worldwide basis, allowing credits for taxes paid in Canada. To the extent that Canadian corporate tax rates fall below American and Japanese rates, multinationals operating in Canada pay correspondingly more tax to their home governments. Further corporate tax reductions would redirect tax payments from Ottawa to Washington and Tokyo. Indeed, as The Globe and Mail reported, “experts warn there are diminishing returns for lowering rates far below U.S. levels. That’s because U.S. governments will end up collecting any difference in rates from American companies operating in Canada” (March 8, 2007, B5).

The Harper-Dion corporate tax cuts would be a giveaway not only to corporate Canada, but also to foreign treasuries.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from SB
Time: September 30, 2008, 5:48 pm

Can someone comment on the growing Lib-Con argument that taxes should target consumption and incomes, not profits?

If profit is understand as surplus value (surplus over necessary labour, ie, exploitation) then it should make sense to tax the institution which is earning this income, and not just the higher wage earners (managers) who derive an individual salary from this profit (and from their own labour).

If corporate profit is based on exploitation, then corporate taxes and fiscal redistribution are forms of taking back what is rightly ours.

How should the left think about this issue? What is the theoretical foundation for the NDP’s position?

Can someone lay out the various economic theories on this issue? (i’m a novice)

Comment from Stephen Gordon
Time: October 1, 2008, 6:09 pm

China – 45.3%
Brazil – 39.1%
India – 37.6%
Korea – 37.1%
United States – 36.0%
France – 35.9%
Japan – 35.0%
NDP Plan for Canada – 31.9%

Are any of those countries above the ‘NDP plan for Canada’ examples we want to emulate?

Okay, maybe France.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: October 2, 2008, 3:39 pm

I would suggest one actually consults the accountants about competitiveness and corporate tax rates. By professional metrics Canada is the third most competitive corporate tax jurisdiction in its apples to apples part of the world. That is according to KPMG. But I suppose economists prefer their own numbers and indexes… given they actually sell their services as global corporate tax advisers ?

I often go to the toe doctor when I have problems with my vision.

Enough of the sarcasm here are the numbers as reported in KPMG’s annual Competitive Alternative publication: Special Report: Focus on Tax

1. Mexico 70.2
2. Netherlands 78.3
3. Canada. 78.8
4. Australia 95.9
5. United States 100.0
6. United Kingdom 101.6
7. Japan 120.8
8. Germany 128.2
9. Italy 172.0
10. France 185.3

See anybody above us you want to emulate?

http://www.mmkconsulting.com/compalts/reports/2008_compalt_report_tax_en.pdf

Write a comment





Related articles