Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Is Layton’s Tax Rate Competitive?

Stéphane Dion has branded Jack Layton an “old-style socialist” with a “job-killing” platform. The C. D. Howe Institute’s Finn Poschmann echoes this view, arguing that corporate tax cuts are needed to keep Canada internationally competitive. (The C. D. Howe Institute is financed and governed by corporate Canada.)

Of course, corporate taxes are but one of many factors that influence competitiveness. Ireland is often cited as an economy built on low corporate taxes. However, as a leading Irish economist noted in the Canadian Tax Journal, “Simplistic conclusions regarding the contribution of tax policy to Ireland’s economic boom are not warranted.”

If anything, the Irish economy took off through targeted support for strategic sectors, rather than through uniformly low tax rates: “the Irish corporate tax system has for long been dualistic, with low rates applicable to export sales (up to 1981) or manufacturing and internationally traded services (post-1981), on the one hand, and a high ‘standard’ rate applicable to the remainder of the corporate sector, on the other.”

However, even if general corporate tax rates were the key factor, the NDP’s plan is internationally competitive. It proposes to continue the general rate of 22.12% and the accelerated capital cost allowance for manufacturing that prevailed in 2007. According to the C. D. Howe Institute’s latest figures, this federal system plus all provincial corporate taxes produced an overall “marginal effective tax rate” of 31.9%. Here’s how that compares with other countries for 2008, including recently completed rate reductions in Italy and Germany:

China – 45.3%
Brazil – 39.1%
India – 37.6%
Korea – 37.1%
United States – 36.0%
France – 35.9%
Japan – 35.0%
NDP Plan for Canada – 31.9%
United Kingdom – 28.7%
Italy – 28.1%
Germany – 27.3%

The NDP platform would situate Canada in the middle of the Group of Seven and well below major emerging markets. The most important comparators are the United States and Japan. Much, if not most, of the internationally-mobile capital in Canada is part of American and Japanese multinational corporations.

Washington and Tokyo tax these corporations on a worldwide basis, allowing credits for taxes paid in Canada. To the extent that Canadian corporate tax rates fall below American and Japanese rates, multinationals operating in Canada pay correspondingly more tax to their home governments. Further corporate tax reductions would redirect tax payments from Ottawa to Washington and Tokyo. Indeed, as The Globe and Mail reported, “experts warn there are diminishing returns for lowering rates far below U.S. levels. That’s because U.S. governments will end up collecting any difference in rates from American companies operating in Canada” (March 8, 2007, B5).

The Harper-Dion corporate tax cuts would be a giveaway not only to corporate Canada, but also to foreign treasuries.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from SB
Time: September 30, 2008, 5:48 pm

Can someone comment on the growing Lib-Con argument that taxes should target consumption and incomes, not profits?

If profit is understand as surplus value (surplus over necessary labour, ie, exploitation) then it should make sense to tax the institution which is earning this income, and not just the higher wage earners (managers) who derive an individual salary from this profit (and from their own labour).

If corporate profit is based on exploitation, then corporate taxes and fiscal redistribution are forms of taking back what is rightly ours.

How should the left think about this issue? What is the theoretical foundation for the NDP’s position?

Can someone lay out the various economic theories on this issue? (i’m a novice)

Comment from Stephen Gordon
Time: October 1, 2008, 6:09 pm

China – 45.3%
Brazil – 39.1%
India – 37.6%
Korea – 37.1%
United States – 36.0%
France – 35.9%
Japan – 35.0%
NDP Plan for Canada – 31.9%

Are any of those countries above the ‘NDP plan for Canada’ examples we want to emulate?

Okay, maybe France.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: October 2, 2008, 3:39 pm

I would suggest one actually consults the accountants about competitiveness and corporate tax rates. By professional metrics Canada is the third most competitive corporate tax jurisdiction in its apples to apples part of the world. That is according to KPMG. But I suppose economists prefer their own numbers and indexes… given they actually sell their services as global corporate tax advisers ?

I often go to the toe doctor when I have problems with my vision.

Enough of the sarcasm here are the numbers as reported in KPMG’s annual Competitive Alternative publication: Special Report: Focus on Tax

1. Mexico 70.2
2. Netherlands 78.3
3. Canada. 78.8
4. Australia 95.9
5. United States 100.0
6. United Kingdom 101.6
7. Japan 120.8
8. Germany 128.2
9. Italy 172.0
10. France 185.3

See anybody above us you want to emulate?

http://www.mmkconsulting.com/compalts/reports/2008_compalt_report_tax_en.pdf

Write a comment





Related articles