Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Organizational Responses Canadian Centre for Policy […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Boots Riley in Winnipeg May 11 February 22, 2019
    Founder of the political Hip-Hop group The Coup, Boots Riley is a musician, rapper, writer and activist, whose feature film directorial and screenwriting debut — 2018’s celebrated Sorry to Bother You — received the award for Best First Feature at the 2019 Independent Spirit Awards (amongst several other accolades and recognitions). "[A] reflection of the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA-BC welcomes Emira Mears as new Associate Director February 11, 2019
    This week the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives – BC Office is pleased to welcome Emira Mears to our staff team as our newly appointed Associate Director. Emira is an accomplished communications professional, digital strategist and entrepreneur. Through her former company Raised Eyebrow, she has had the opportunity to work with many organizations in the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Study explores media coverage of pipeline controversies December 14, 2018
    Supporters of fossil fuel infrastructure projects position themselves as friends of working people, framing climate action as antithetical to the more immediately pressing need to protect oil and gas workers’ livelihoods. And as the latest report from the CCPA-BC and Corporate Mapping Project confirms, this framing has become dominant across the media landscape. Focusing on pipeline […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Study highlights ‘uncomfortable truth’ about racism in the job market December 12, 2018
    "Racialized workers in Ontario are significantly more likely to be concentrated in low-wage jobs and face persistent unemployment and earnings gaps compared to white employees — pointing to the “uncomfortable truth” about racism in the job market, according to a new study." Read the Toronto Star's coverage of our updated colour-coded labour market report, released […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Equal per capita CO2 emissions vs global population growth

George Monbiot’s book about climate change, Heat, recommends a scheme of global emission reductions based on the principle of equity. That is, every person on the planet should have an equal right to emit a certain amount of CO2 per year, with some long-term total emissions cap that keeps the planet from getting too hot. I have seen a number of other commentators invoke this principle, too.

The principle of equity means that the “rich” (heavy users of CO2) would have to pay the “poor” (who emit less than a sustainable level) to maintain their lifestyles, an equalizing force in an increasingly unequal world. And it would preserve some room for the poorest countries to develop their economies, while making the advanced countries (who have already developed on the basis of extensive CO2 emissions) bear more of the burden of adjustment.

But while this logic is impeccable, I detect a rather large fly in the ointment, and that is global population increases. If you believe the projections, global population could hit 9-10 billion by mid-decade, up from about 6.5 billion today. So an additional 3 billion people who would represent a net increase in global population, by 2050 would command about one-third of global CO2 emissions.

I’ve never been one to be excessively concerned about global population, given that the resource demands in parts of the world where the increase is happening tend to be on the low side. Yet, if we take equal per capita CO2 emissions seriously, we now have a problem. If we are going down that road, we need to simultaneously be talking about targets for global population, so that we peak at a much lower number (and how and whether this could be practically implemented is a huge question).

Alternatively, we abandon equity and do not consider population growth. Or it could also be the case that climate change itself, due to droughts, extreme weather and so forth, will act to limit global population growth. But the numbers are pretty grim, in terms of total per person reductions, if we have both equity in per capita emissions AND accept population growth on that scale.

This issue is a global version of the intensity targets issue, raised in areas such as transportation. All well and good to reduce emissions per car, but if we ignore the increasing total amount of cars on the road, we cannot reduce total emissions.

Enjoy and share:

Write a comment





Related articles