Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The Other National Newspapers on TILMA

Following the National Post’s complete endorsement of TILMA on Friday, The Globe and Mail and Toronto Star ran columns on Saturday that were relatively skeptical of this agreement. As both columns note, the joint statement released by the Premiers in Moncton leaves the door open to making the Agreement on Internal Trade more like TILMA without committing to do so.

(I classify the Star as a “national newspaper” because its circulation nearly equals that of The Globe and Post combined: 641,445 versus 414,860 and 234,409.)

Under the headline “No Consensus, No Problem,” The Globe’s Murray Campbell noted that the Premiers have

ducked a challenge by British Columbia and Alberta to sign on to their controversial bilateral pact, called TILMA . . . The premiers’ plan promised full labour mobility by April, 2009, to establish penalties of up to $5-million for trade-rule violations and to harmonize [trucking regulations]. But it stepped lightly when it came to outlining the exact mechanics of a dispute-resolution system. . . .

They could go no further because they don’t have a consensus. Saskatchewan and Manitoba have spurned the idea of a western trading pact using TILMA rules. Ontario is still studying the implications of the pact and pondering whether the better way ahead is simply to simplify its relations with its major trading partner, Quebec. . . .

But the course of future action shouldn’t be determined until we get a better sense of the problems. TILMA’s advocates are fond of ridiculing the current trade climate in Canada . . . Some trade economists argue, however, that remaining trade barriers do not justify what some call the “overkill” of TILMA.

Business loves the B.C.-Alberta deal, and well they should, since a former Alberta cabinet minister said it was “everything Canadian business asked for.” On the other hand, labour unions say the provision in TILMA that there should be “no obstacles” to free trade compromises governments. They say the agreement gives commercial interests the unfettered right to sue to remove any regulation – rules dealing, perhaps, with worker safety or land use – that might impair trade. . . .

But there is too much that is unknown about the impact of a TILMA-style pact to allow the premiers to meet behind closed doors and to commit their citizens to it. The leaders should return to the subject at the annual meeting next year equipped with more information. And would it kill them to actually ask people what they think?

The Star’s Ian Urquhart seemed to accept the alleged severity of inter-provincial trade barriers, although he described this concept as “a national cliche”. He provided some specific analysis of the Ontario scene, including some good quotes from Wayne Samuelson:

Ontario has made noises about joining TILMA. Last year, McGuinty called it “a step in the right direction.”

That set off alarm bells in the ranks of organized labour, which sees TILMA as an attempt to water down health, safety and employment standards to the lowest common denominator and to introduce privatization and deregulation through the back door.

“We would suggest that this is the wrong direction for Ontario,” wrote Wayne Samuelson, president of the Ontario Federation of Labour (OFL), in a letter to McGuinty earlier this year.

But Ontario government sources say McGuinty has been toying with TILMA to gain leverage with other provinces in his campaign to put teeth in the [Agreement on Internal Trade].

. . . the ink was barely dry on the premiers’ agreement before the OFL’s Samuelson raised concerns that it would be used to “reduce or remove the role of government” in setting standards.

“If Ontario or any government wants to go down that road, then they should not be talking about it with a bunch of guys in a hotel room in Moncton,” said Samuelson. “Let’s have a public debate.” . . .

With Ontario going to the polls on Oct. 10, this could well become an election issue.

Enjoy and share:


Comment from Penney Kome
Time: August 15, 2007, 9:45 am

Raising TILMA and the SPP during the Ontario elections would be a breakthrough indeed. Albertans and British Columbians never had a chance to debate the treaty — and public consternation at discovering the terms of the agreement probably helped warn Saskatchewan and Manitoba away from it. Murray Dobbin reports that cities and towns in BC are passing legislation to exempt themselves from TILMA.

However, no matter what the Star’s circulation is, and even with the Internet, I think it’s kind of Torontocentric to refer to it as a national paper. Its audience is mainly local, no matter how much any of us might wish otherwise.

Write a comment

Related articles