Canada’s new recession and the push for alternatives

The Bank of Canada cut its benchmark interest rate two weeks ago to nearly record lows, now just 0.5%. In the face of an oil shock and other weakness, monetary policy is expected to do the heavy lifting of beating an economic funk. Today’s move reflects a poverty of economic policy from the ruling Conservatives and much of the political class.

Harper has been adamant that Canada’s downturn—now very likely a recession, about which his own Finance Minister  remains in denial—is the result of global forces. There’s nothing that can be done to counteract a host of external problems but to button down. The best a government can hope for is to maintain a fabled fiscal discipline.

However, there’s a disjoint between saying that policy couldn’t have been used to avert downturns like this one and screaming bloody murder anytime someone raises the prospect of even mildly activist, redistributive, old-school social democratic economic policy. If current policy is that ineffective, then perhaps it’s high time to try something else? “There’s nothing we could have done” is just a fatalistic cover for political choices.

These choices were cemented with the Conservatives’ damaging balanced budget law that was passed with this year’s budget. According to the new law, a recession this year will mean that a deficit will be “allowed” next year, but that automatic spending freezes on many public sector budgets and wages will also kick in.

The government will be in a position to break from budget surplus but not from important parts of the slow-motion austerity agenda. Given the current budget’s optimistic growth projections (2% real GDP growth for 2015 compared with the Bank of Canada downward revision to 1.1% today), there will be a deficit nonetheless. It is hard to see how any future Conservative government would not use this pretext to make more cuts, to starve the beast some more.

What remains is for lower interest rates to keep feeding construction booms and real estate bubbles across Canada. A post on the FT’s Alphaville blog makes this point, warning that this latest rate cut will only aggravate what everyone including the OECD and the Bank of Canada describe as an “overvalued” market. On the other hand, there’s still enough capital sloshing around the world that this strategy might work for a few more rounds. Canada’s more stringent laws have so far contributed to slowing more explosive bubble growth.

Meanwhile, the oil boom is over for now, the industry in hibernation. While the effect of the oil price crash has been a net positive in the US with the boost from lower prices facing consumers taking the upper hand, in Canada, the net effect looks to be a net negative. (Even though both Canada and the US have oil industries that make up a small, single-digit percentage of GDP, Canada’s are more important to our exports and the US has the world reserve currency, not one tied increasingly to resource exports as is Canada’s.)

This is the best we’ve got is the message from the establishment, not just the Conservatives.

So I suppose we can now look forward to hear more about the feared zero lower bound, secular stagnation and the like, all familiar from economic discourse elsewhere in the global North. After years as the darling of the advanced economies, Canada today lacks an “enlightened wing” of its elite to buttress the economy.

In the US, this role was played by Fed, which through its QE program helped revive post-crash US capitalism and Canada’s along with it. Now the QE taps are off south of the border and while the US is growing—slowly and without much growth in the incomes of workers but growing—Canada has most likely entered into a recession all of its own.


The silver lining is that there is a space and an opening here in which to push for alternatives. The coming election is an opportunity to push the debate towards more than fumbling the ball better or worse. Far beyond that, however, there is room to orgainize around and popularize economic alternatives. The mainstream of the environmental movement is calling for jobs alongside climate justice. And here is a list of demands that was just released by the heads of the provincial labour federations:

  • $15/hour minimum wage across the country;
  • doubling of the Canada Pension Plan;
  • creation of an affordable national childcare program;
  • the revival of the Canada Health Accord;
  • comprehensive immigration strategy with a pathway to citizenship; and
  • establishment of a Green Jobs agenda for Canada.

Just these measures speak loudly in a desert of popular alternatives and they are but some examples. And the question of how to fund any of these demands will raise the question of who pays and how much: difficult, necessary questions that have their mirror in those about who has gained over the past two decades of growth.

Here is to alternatives. The government is prepared to blame the world and fall back on austerity, while the Bank of Canada can only pump more money into a bubble. This is a space for a left with simple, popular economic demands.

Originally posted on my blog two weeks ago and only belatedly cross-posted here. In my defense, I’ve been busy setting up my new site: check it out at!


  • Purple Library Guy

    It’s past time for a return to selective protectionism and import-substitution industrial policy. With a particular emphasis on green jobs, yes, but more broadly as well.

    And if the “free trade” agreements say that’s impossible, well, it’s also past time to walk away from them.

  • When will people link the policies of this government to the overall global economic policies that encourage risk-taking by the 1% over the well-being of people? Harper can claim non-responsibility for the domestic economy all he wants, but every time he cut taxes and pushed FTAs down our throats, he bought into global climates that ensured our demise.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *