What Do Banks Actually DO? Teach-In With Occupy Toronto
What do banks actually DO?Â Create credit out of thin air.
Were Canadian banks bailed-out?Â Absolutely, to the tune of $200 billion.Â And they are still protected and subsidized more than any other sector of the economy.
What must be done with these banks?Â Tax them, control them, and ultimately take them back.
Those are the “take-aways” from a short talk on the banking system that I was honoured to give as part of an Occupy Toronto rally last weekend at the corner of King and Bay in downtown Toronto. Several folks have asked for the written version of my speech, whichÂ is posted below.Â A video is available here.Â I free-styled it in places, so there are differences between the written speech and the video (as they say, “check against delivery”!)
Well, here we are on Bay Street again, amidst all these gleaming towers, and all this luxury, and power, and affluence.
And what an amazing community we have formed here.
On behalf of the CAW and the CCPA, let me begin by thanking all of you for what you are doing.Â What you are building.Â The political and moral space you have opened up through the Occupy movement these past few weeks.
Thereâ€™s no better place than right here to talk about whatâ€™s gone so terribly wrong in our society.Â About the enormous and immoral contrast between what we see here on Bay Street, and what things are like where most Canadians â€“ the 99% of Canadians â€“ live and work.Â Down on Main Street.
You already know that, thatâ€™s why youâ€™re here.Â All this nonsense Iâ€™ve heard in the last two weeks about the Occupiers being naÃ¯ve and confused, is so wrong.Â I have a Ph.D. in economics, and I can assure you that the people in this crowd today know more about economics â€“ more about real economics â€“ than all the stock brokers in these tall towers put together.
You know about work.Â About production.Â About sharing.Â And about sustaining.
They stand around throwing darts at the dartboard, to pick the next stock theyâ€™re going to buy.Â Proving every day that while government may or may not be able to pick winners, they canâ€™t be any worse at it than the stock market is!
Work.Â Production.Â Sharing.Â Sustaining.Â Thatâ€™s the basis of real economics, the real job of improving living standards and protecting the environment.
Not throwing darts.Â Not rolling dice.Â Not placing bets.
I often think about what goes on inside these towers.Â The plush offices, the oak paneling, the fine art on the walls, the private dining areas, the clubs and bars.
Not everyone down here works like that, of course.Â Most of the real work is done by hard-working office workers, who work hard for not much money.
But the ones who call the shots down here, and call the shots for our whole economy, they do very well.Â Every now and then I get to step inside one of those towers, in the course of my job.Â Into one of those investment banks.Â Those private dining areas.Â Those boardroooms.
The meals, the furnishings.Â And of course the compensation.Â Immoral, offensive compensation.Â All of it tax-deductible.
Then I compare all that to the generally shoddy state of public institutions and facilities in this city.Â Like the rec centre in my neighbourhood, out in Parkdale.Â Or the public schools where my kids go to school.Â Fine, wonderful schools.Â But underfunded and dingy, to be sure.
Rob Ford said he went to City Hall to stop the gravy train.Â When I compare public institutions in this city, to these towers here on Bay Street, I know that Rob Ford missed his target by about 3 blocks.Â He was 3 blocks too far north.
Want to stop the gravy train, Rob Ford?Â Come down here to stop the gravy train!Â A gravy train thatâ€™s funded with the proceeds of what, ultimately, is just gambling.
Ever since the Occupy movement came to Canada â€“ even before that, actually â€“ thereâ€™s been an enormous myth propagated that these guys here on Bay Street â€“ the Canadian banks â€“ did nothing wrong.
Our banks are strong and safe, they say.Â They were prudent.Â And they werenâ€™t bailed out.
They pat us on the head, and they say: â€œGo to Wall Street to have your little protest.Â But donâ€™t bother protesting here.Â Because we didnâ€™t do anything wrong.â€
Well thatâ€™s simply a lie.Â Itâ€™s a bald-faced, empirically refutable lie.
In the first place, Canadian banks were bailed out â€“ and in a big way.Â Check the record:
At the end of 2008, and the beginning of 2009, Finance Minister Jim Flaherty and other federal officials moved heaven and earth to help Canadaâ€™s banks.Â Flaherty implemented a new program called the Extraordinary Financing Framework.Â Or â€œEFFâ€ for short.
You know, I could think of another meaning for the acronym â€œEFF.â€Â Elitist Frigginâ€™ Financiers!Â Thatâ€™s the real EFF.
It consisted of many different ways to help the banks â€“ these powerful, prudent banks â€“ during their hour of need.
Buying back mortgages in order to inject cash into the banksâ€™ coffers.Â Providing huge loans, at near-zero interest rates, from the Bank of Canada, when commercial lenders wouldnâ€™t dare.Â Providing other lines of credit, including in U.S. dollars.Â And backing the whole thing up with very weird forms of collateral â€“ or sometimes with no collateral at all.
For example, the Bank of Canada was willing to accept asset-backed commercial paper, or ABCP, from the banks to back up some of these emergency loans.
Remember the ABCP debacle in Canada?Â That sophisticated, but highly unstable market totally froze up in Canada, even before the global meltdown.
If you owned ABCP as an individual, you couldnâ€™t spend it.Â It was just paper in your pocket.Â But the banks held ABCP, and they were able to convert it into cold hard cash, courtesy of the Bank of Canada, when they needed it.
In total, various federal agencies offered the banks up to $200 billion in cash and short term ultra-low-interest loans, at a point in time when the banks could not attain this financing from normal commercial sources because of the global crisis.
They needed it.Â They got it.Â It was a bail-out, pure and simple.
It was a smart thing to do.Â The banks have paid the money back, with interest in some cases.Â (Not much interest, since the interest rates were near zero.)
But that doesnâ€™t mean it wasnâ€™t a bail out.
So for the banks and their executives to lecture Canadians, and our governments, about the need to be prudent and fiscally responsible and tighten our belts, is the most offensive thing we could possibly hear.
If it werenâ€™t for Canadian governments and taxpayers, they would quite possibly be out of business.
Weâ€™re in this together.Â Letâ€™s start acting that way!
So the banks were bailed out, pure and simple.Â And moreover, they continue to be coddled and protected and subsidized by the state.Â Our government is indeed a â€œnanny state,â€ where high finance is concerned.
They are protected against foreign takeovers.
Tell me, if we can protect our banks against foreign takeovers, why canâ€™t we protect our land, and our resources, and our factories, and our jobs against foreign takeovers?Â Why is it protectionist to protect people, but not protectionist to protect banks?
They are protected against crises of confidence by an extensive public deposit guarantee system, and a public mortgage insurance program that eliminates most of the risk of their lending.
And they receive enormous subsidies delivered through Canadaâ€™s distorted tax system.
Hereâ€™s just one example.Â Capital gains taxation.Â If you make money by buying and selling an asset, your speculative profit is called a â€œcapital gain.â€
In Canada, you only have to declare half your capital gains income on your tax return.Â Itâ€™s called â€œpartial inclusion.â€Â
If you flip hamburgers in a hot, greasy fast food restaurant all day, you have to declare every penny of your hard-earned income on your tax return.
But if you flip stocks and bonds all day in one of these towers, you only declare half.
Thatâ€™s immoral.Â Itâ€™s inefficient: because it encourages gambling over real production.Â But most of all itâ€™s offensive, when these subsidized fat-cats lecture the rest of us about tightening our belts.
Same goes for across-the-board corporate tax cuts.Â The federal CIT rate has been cut almost in half since 2000, from 29% to 15%.Â Tell me, have any of you had your tax rates cut in half since 2000?Â I didnâ€™t think so.
But these banks have.
Those cumulative tax cuts (along with provincial rate cuts) have saved the financial sector over $10 billion per year.Â Just the new tax cuts that the Harper government implemented since 2006 alone (cutting the federal rate from 21% to 15%), put another $3 billion per year into the pockets of the banks.
Tell me, looking around Canada today, and all the problems we face.Â Is further enhancing the after-tax profits of the financial industry, really the top priority?Â Really the most important thing for Canada to spend $3 billion on per year?
Of course not.Â But in our society, itâ€™s not priority that determines where money is spent.Â Itâ€™s power.
So banks are protected and subsidized, and bailed out when needed.Â But what do banks actually do, in return for all that money?Â
What is their actual economic function?Â
Letâ€™s cut through the mystification of high finance, and ask that simple question:Â What do banks do?Â What do bankers actually produce?
The practical answer, in concrete terms, is simple: nothing.Â They produce nothing.
In that, the banks are different from the real economy, where hard-working people like you and I produce actual, concrete goods and services that are useful.
Banks, and the financial sector more generally, donâ€™t produce goods and services that are useful in their own right.Â They produce paper.Â And then they buy and sell paper, for a profit.
Hereâ€™s a little economic lesson.Â You canâ€™t live off paper.Â You need food, clothing, and shelter to survive â€“ not paper. Â And since we are human beings, not animals, we need more:Â we need education, and culture, and recreation, and entertainment, and security, and meaning.Â Those are the fundamentals of economic life.Â Not paper.
What is paper actually good for?Â You can wallpaper your house with it.Â You can line your birdcage with it.Â In a pinch, you can wipe your butt with it.
But other than that, paper is just paper.Â It is not concretely useful in its own right.
How do banks create that paper?Â Let me put it bluntly again:Â They create it out of thin air.
It is not an economic exaggeration to state that the private banking system has the power to create money out of thin air.
Not cash.Â Not currency.Â Only the government can produce that.
But most money in our economy â€“ over 95% of money in our economy â€“ is not currency.Â Most money consists of entries in electronic accounts.Â Savings accounts.Â Chequing accounts.Â Lines of credit.Â Credit card balances.Â Investment accounts.
In that electronic system, new money is created, not by printing currency, but through creating credit.Â Every time a bank issues someone a new loan, they are creating new money.
Itâ€™s like a big magic machine, creating money out of thin air.Â And itâ€™s called the private credit system.
One of my favourite economists, John Kenneth Galbraith, put it this way:Â â€œThe process by which private banks create money is so simple that the mind is repelled.â€
How do they do it?Â They start out with some capital.Â Letâ€™s say a billion dollars.Â Then they lend it out.Â Then they lend it out again.Â And again.Â And again and again, 10 or 20 or 50 times over.
Each new loan, is new money.Â The economy needs that money, letâ€™s be clear.Â Without new money, we wouldnâ€™t be able to pay for the stuff we make.Â So weâ€™d stop making it, and weâ€™d be in a depression.
So the creation of new money (or credit) is as essential function for the whole economy.Â Itâ€™s like a utility.Â But weâ€™ve outsourced that crucial task to private banks.Â Weâ€™ve given them a legal license to print money â€“ and the freedom and power to do it on their own terms.
Their goal is not providing the economy with a sensible, sustainable supply of the credit we need.Â Their goal is using their unique power to create money out of thin air, to maximize the profits of the banks, and the wealth of the shareholders.
How does this system work, creating money out of thin air?Â It only works if:
Number 1:Â Not everyone comes to the bank to withdraw all this imaginary money, in the form of real cash, at the same time.Â And ifâ€¦
Number 2:Â The banks keep lending to each other, which is essential to make sure each one has the cash it needs for withdrawals.
We can immediately see that this system is inherently fragile.Â Banks create new loans many times larger than their capital, profiting off the interest they earn.Â But the money was created out of thin air.Â Itâ€™s not actually there, if people want it at the same time, and if the banks wonâ€™t help each other out.
So Canadaâ€™s banks are fragile, too.Â True, our banks only lent their capital out 20 times over, not 50 times like the Europeans did.Â Thatâ€™s because Canadian regulations capped the leverage at 20.Â But theyâ€™ve still got 20 times more loans out there, than they actually have money in the bank.Â
Confidence is essential to the stability of the whole system.Â But confidence is intangible and impossible to predict.Â If confidence went south, Canadian banks would collapse as surely as Lehman Brothers or Dexia did.
Now, what do the banks do with all that money they created out of thin air?Â They lend it out.Â Some of it flows into the real economy, to pay for homes and cars and capital equipment.Â But not enough goes there.Â Thatâ€™s why our real economy is stuck.Â Thatâ€™s why there are 2 million Canadians unemployed, official and unofficial.
What about the money that doesnâ€™t flow into the real economy?Â Unfortunately, the banks use enormous amounts of it to place bets, enormous bets, buying and selling the paper assets that are created and traded in these towers.Â Itâ€™s gambling, not production.Â Itâ€™s legalized, subsidized gambling, all protected by the state.
The interaction of the private credit system, together with the speculative motive, that creates such turmoil and destruction, with each successive financial bubble.Â Without massive injections of new credit, the asset bubble could never expand so far â€“ whether itâ€™s sub-prime derivatives, dot-com stocks, or rare earth futures.
If speculators had to spend their own money on these asset bubbles, the prices could never rise to such precarious and destructive levels.
Now, there are two key problems with the operation of this private credit system, and its interaction with speculation, that we must understand in order to fight for change.
First, the flow of credit â€“ created out of thin air by these banks â€“ is like a roller-coaster, all depending on the mood swings of the bankers.
When their greed overwhelms their fear, they will lend to anyone with a pulse.Â But when their fear overwhelms their greed, and they want to hoard every penny possible against the feared run on the bank, they pull back loans even from their most reliable customers.
This roller-coaster, called the â€œbankersâ€™ cycle,â€ is an inherent and destabilizing feature of the private credit system.Â And since the whole economy depends on the flow of new money, the flow of new credit, we are forced to follow the same roller-coaster.
The second problem is that thereâ€™s nothing underpinning the paper valuations of financial assets, when theyâ€™ve been pumped up by the combination of speculation and irresponsible credit creation.
Then, when speculatorsâ€™ moods switch polarities, the whole thing comes crashing down.Â Quoting Galbraith again, â€œA popped balloon never deflates in an orderly manner.â€
And then we all pay the price for a crisis we didnâ€™t cause.Â And we all suffer the hangover from a party we werenâ€™t invited to.
This cycle of paper expansion and contraction, euphoria and panic, is hard-wired into the DNA of the deregulated private financial system.Â The cycle has happened before.Â And it will happen again.Â The current crisis was no unfortunate accident, no â€œperfect storm.â€Â This crisis is simply par for the course, for a system that values speculation over production â€“ and that gives the private credit system free reign to throw gasoline on the fire, through unlimited, unregulated credit creation.
It will happen again and again, until we change the rules of this pointless, destructive game.
So what do we do?
First, tax them.Â Thatâ€™s the idea behind the Robin Hood Tax, that we are fighting for today.Â Make them pay a little bit, with every pointless, unproductive transaction, to help clean up the mess they left behind.
A transactions tax alone wonâ€™t solve the problem.Â It wonâ€™t stop the process.Â But at least it will support the public services that we need, all the more so in the wake of each financial meltdown.
Same goes for corporate tax cuts.Â Letâ€™s reverse them.Â Put the federal rate back to 18% for the financial sector alone, and weâ€™d raise $1.5 billion per year for essential public services.
Taxing the banks is important.Â But taxing the banks is not enough.
So, second, we must control them.Â Put in place rules that require them to use this immense power, the power to create money out of thin air, to use it sensibly and productively.Â Prohibit the gambling.Â Make sure loans are aimed at sustainable, productive purposes.
The new measures being promoted internationally by Mark Carney are a step in the right direction.Â But a tiny, tiny baby step.Â We need more powerful restrictions.
And friends, even controlling the banks is not enough.
What we ultimately have to do is take them back.Â Thereâ€™s nothing magical about creating credit out of thin air.Â Thereâ€™s no special technology or knowledge needed.Â Just the legal power.
We can create credit out of thin air, just as well as any private bank can.Â Ultimately, we need a public, democratic, accountable banking system.Â One that serves the Canadian economy, not the wealth of those who own banks.
If we can create money out of thin air to buy and sell sub-prime mortgage bonds, then by god we can create money out of thin air to pay for affordable housing that could end homelessness.
If we can create money out of thin air to buy short options on Greek sovereign debt, then we can create money out of thin air to invest in a green energy system to stop global climate change.
If we can create money out of thin air to speculate on international currencies, we can create money out of thin air to buy needed medicines to prevent hundreds of millions of needless deaths from disease in the Third World.
Thereâ€™s no magic to it.Â These ideas are prudent and rational and economically sound.Â Because like we said at the beginning, it is work and production and sharing and sustaining that supports our real economy.Â Not gambling with paper.
These towers look powerful.Â But ultimately they are built on paper.
Weâ€™ve got the real power, with our ability to work and produce and share and sustain.Â Weâ€™ve got the power to build something new.Â Weâ€™ve got the power to replace these towers with a system that works.
And thatâ€™s exactly what weâ€™ve started to do with this movement.Â Thank you for what you are doing!Â And letâ€™s get on with the job!
wow Jim – so wish I had been there to hear you speak!
Wow. Great job, Jimbo.
Thank you, Jim. Now, let’s begin!
I must say Jimbo quite a good speech. Need to get these ideas deeper and wider into that discourse. The stages are being built and the comms network is coming along.
Jim, I am shocked you were so candid viz., the mandrake banking and who says Canadian banks were not bailed out. Lets not forget government injected capital into banks when the banks refused to honour liquidity guarantees to commercial paper conduits after ABCP markets siezed up. The Canadian banks cited an out clause that this wasn’t “real market disruption” because bank sponsored market was functioning!!
Perhaps someone can be equally forthright about this Conservative government’s majority as well.
Who do you think Mr Harper was appealing to when he moaned in Afghanistan about his lack of majority? Certainly not Canadians. Nowhere have citizens voted to build super prisons/gulags, not even 39.6% – real history of movements that transpired in Germany, Soviet union and China are very different than the conventionally believed stories.
This Conservative majority is so porous that if they were to call a referendum (without involvement of Elections Canada) on the policies that this government is unilaterally imposing on Canadians, this myth of Democrazy in the Western Hemisphere will be shattered irretrievably.
Hey Jim, you mention that the fabrication of new money is necessary “Each new loan, is new money. The economy needs that money, letâ€™s be clear. Without new money, we wouldnâ€™t be able to pay for the stuff we make. So weâ€™d stop making it, and weâ€™d be in a depression.” with which I agree, but I’m curious:
Why can’t we fabricate that new money simply by printing more of it?
Well, what can I say? I have a somewhat different perspective than you on this matter. In case anyone is interested, I’ve written it here:
Great information, great work keep it up.
I have recently read the book the “the Price of Civilization” By Jeffery Sachs, and while it deals almost entirely with the US situation many of the points touch what you have to say as well. It would be great if you could reccomend someone who has written similar work related to the Canadian situation, it would be informative and important in taking our Government back from the Bay Street Corporatocracy.
Great speech Jim — See info about the bailout at: http://cancrc.org/english/relOct1811en.html and see the 15 key systemic changes that we need to Canadian bank accountability and corporate responsibility laws, endorsed by the nation-wide Canadian Community Reinvestment Coalition and Corporate Responsibility Coalition (made up of more than 120 groups with a total membership of more than 3 million Canadians) at:
http://dwatch.ca/camp/RelsOct1211.html and an Action Alert to send a letter in support of the changes at: http://www.dwatch.ca/camp/actcorpsystem.html
Hope this helps,
Duff Conacher, Founding Director of http://DemocracyWatch.ca
Founder of the http://CoffeeParty.ca movement
Question for you sir, you said: “our banks only lent their capital out 20 times over…thatâ€™s because Canadian regulations capped the leverage at 20”, but since the early 90’s our fractional reserve rate in Canada is nil, so what regulation caps lending at 20 times over?
I’m a JK Galbraith fan as well:)
Sorry in advance for the difficulty you might have to read my message : English is my second language.
Unions have a considerable responsibility, political and economic.
They amply facilitated the “big game” played around credit and housing, by commercial banks and international investment holdings, in all world cities and even rural areas.
Urban planification strategies (let’s call them strategies of working class indebtedness) have been possible thanks to housing credit. Unionized workers pension funds were a very big component of these strategies.
The result has been an incredible acceleration of gentrification and “social epuration” in cities.
The social epuration has been mainly at the benefit of the new middle class (small investors sector and communication/information/informatics/marketting/art sector), at the expense of the poorest segments of the working class, which has been treated very brutally, as workers and as urban residents.
A video (link) shows the deleterious effect of the intervention of investment holdings like Lone Star (which manages many union pensions funds).
This exemple concerns France (Marseilles). But the same urban planning strategies have been used by banks and international investorts, states, and municipalities all around the world. (See for exemple Neil Smith research work on Urban colonization; plus other studies on the subject of gentrification).
I insist that these strategies would have been much more difficult to implement without union approval and in fact, enthousiastic support.
Banks have managed to extort a huge amount of money from small buyers of houses and apartments, and big investors now own an enormous part of cities’ housing cakes.
Many tenants are now absolutely poor or on the verge of poverty, and very often helpless victims in front of powerfull landlords.
Retired unions members have been “bought”.
Investors promised bigger returns on pension funds investment. It was of course a lie, but in the first phase, this has worked. Interests increased at the beginning of housing speculation. Everybody was happy.
Non unionized and unemployed workers knew they would pay the first to pay; now unions leaders know and panic : eventually, their members will also pay and anger will be generalÂ.
All this pension funds craziness has had another effect on general political attitudes : : unions leaders have seen themselves more an more as “partners” of the capitalist class. They played increasingly the role of “social regulators” (in the medias). Despite the fact that their ability to negociate was weaker, they continued to believe that capitalism could reform itself. They more or less continued to sell to everyone this idea of regular capitalist improvement.
A number, always greater, of non unionized and poor workers has not seen any improvement, quite the contrary. For more than 20 years.
Last but not least, a certain number of union workers started to think they could outplay capitalits, investing their own money in multinationals. After the information bubble … it has been housing.
In Montreal the consequence of the condos construction fever has been the expulsion of about 300 000 individuals workers and families from their apartment.
Urban tenants are harassed by landlords. Landlords used these methods of harassement because they were quite conscious that municipalities and unions were on their side.
There has been and increased number of unexplained housing fires in many cities, unexplained electricity failures and floodings in appartments; also unexpected visits at night and threats.
Bullying tenants has become normal again .. as in the good old times.
Many workers have come to believe, naively but also cynically, that capitalists would share with them the “plus-value” extracted from less protected workers, thinking this strategies could be permanent. Even if the consequences were immediately deadly for others.
Union politics has been more letal than strategies of the leading capitalist elites, because non unionized workers could not count anymore on anyone.
I use the expression “union politics but a more accurate expression, but less delicate should be “cynical pragmatism”.
Union collaboration with capitalist orientations on credit has been and is destructive.
It had a profondly divisive effect on the working class and has lead to disgust, mistrust, cynicism and depolitization.
I hope, Mr Stanford, that you are going to denounce the credit strategy based on pension funds approved by unions, and of the cities social epuration effect on older and unemployed workers.
This is one very important way to start rebuilding some trust between non unionized and unemployed workers (who, by the way, represent now the vast majority of workers) and unions.
The speech was a good attempt to bring light into the main source of the crisis: MONEY CREATION, but I like to clarify a few points.
1- The system that allows Private Banks to be the creators of 95% of the currency we badly need to have a Real Economy is called FRACTIONAL RESERVE BANKING SYSTEM. This system has to be openly and decidedly declared a FRAUD. And since it is a fraud, no “reform” to the system will do but its total eradication.
2- It is a FRAUD because it is unsustainable on its own. The currency it creates AS DEBT, as loans comes with Interest attached and the money to pay that interest is never created, therefore it is inherent in the system to always function with scarcity of funds to operate, forcing thousands of Real Economy workers and manufacturers and governments to FAIL in their attempts to pay back the loans. This situation is masked when the money supply is growing with new loans, making the economy to grow, but it is only temporary because when we add it all up, ALWAYS someone will be short and will have to lose his/her real assets to a bank.
3- To solve a problem is very important to understand it. An important feature of the Fractional Reserve Banking System is not only the Private Bank’s license to create money out of thin air, but when the loans are paid back…… the money DISAPPEARS!!!
What this means is that once we pay back our loans, the money doesn’t stay in the bank’s vaults waiting to be relent again and become productive. It is GONE and the ONLY way to get more currency to expand the economy is…… we have to get into debt again!!! Can you see the TRAP????
It’s like a drug you need to survive, but the more you get it, the more you’re hooked into it and eventually it takes over your life completely.
4- Let’s be clear. If everyone paid back their loans, (individuals, businesses and governments) to the banks, there wouldn’t be a single dollar in circulation, chocking the Real Economy to death and collapsing it altogether.
This is why AUSTERITY is making things worse, not better. Austerity is based on the old assumptions when money was gold coins that when paid back to a bank, the coins remained in the vaults to be relent again, and be productive. THIS DOESN’T HAPPEN IN THIS SYSTEM. Failure to understand this is creating the worst crash in the history of human kind.
5- We need to stop the license to issue new money as loans by all private banks.
6- Force Private banks to fund fully 100% every loan. NO MORE LEVERAGE, no more lending money they don’t have.
7- Get the Central Bank to issue INTEREST-FREE money to itself, and inject it into the economy as government expenditures into infrastructure, labor costs etc. People will save it in banks, and banks will lend it out to the Real Economy with a difference between the interest they offer to savers, and the interest they charge to borrowers (just like what people think is happening already BUT DOESN’T)
We need to CHANGE the system, not merely reform it.
A Simple Solution to the Debt Crisis – Positive Money
“I sincerely believe the (private) banking institutions having the issuing power of money, are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies”
“There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation,
One is by the sword. The other is by Debt”