Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Could skyrocketing private sector debt spell economic crisis? June 21, 2017
    Our latest report finds that Canada is racking up private sector debt faster than any other advanced economy in the world, putting the country at risk of serious economic consequences. The report, Addicted to Debt, reveals that Canada has added $1 trillion in private sector debt over the past five years, with the corporate sector […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The energy industry’s insatiable thirst for water threatens First Nations’ treaty-protected rights June 21, 2017
    Our latest report looks at the growing concerns that First Nations in British Columbia have with the fossil fuel industry’s increasing need for large volumes of water for natural gas fracking operations. Titled Fracking, First Nations and Water: Respecting Indigenous rights and better protecting our shared resources, it describes what steps should be taken to […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Betting on Bitumen: Alberta's energy policies from Lougheed to Klein June 8, 2017
    The role of government in Alberta, both involvement and funding, has been critical in ensuring that more than narrow corporate interests were served in the development of the province’s bitumen resources.  A new report contrasts the approaches taken by two former premiers during the industry’s early development and rapid expansion periods.  The Lougheed government invested […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Canada-China FTA will leave workers worse off June 2, 2017
    Global Affairs Canada is currently consulting Canadians on a possible Canada-China free trade agreement. In CCPA’s submission to this process, CCPA senior researcher Scott Sinclair argues that an FTA based on Canada’s standard template would almost certainly reinforce rather than improve upon Canada’s imbalanced and deleterious trade with China. It can also be expected to […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Faulty assumptions about pipelines and tidewater access May 30, 2017
    The federal and Alberta governments and the oil industry argue that pipelines to tidewater will unlock new markets where Canadian oil can command a better price than in the US, where the majority of Canadian oil is currently exported. Both governments have approved Kinder Morgan's Trans Mountain Expansion Project, but a new report finds that […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Labour Market still weak: Bank of Canada

The Bank of Canada released their January 2013 Monetary Policy Report.  Of note, the Bank downgraded its growth expectation for 2013 to 2.0% from 2.3%, and expects the Canadian economy will not reach full potential until late 2014.

Several key points in the January MPR reinforce what progressive economists have been saying about the Canadian labour market.

Since 2010, more than 27% of part-time workers have been “involuntary part-timers”.  That means that they are underemployed, working part-time but wanting full-time employment.  This graph shows that there has been very little improvement on that front.

Wage increases have been moderate since the recession, and the Bank expects that this will continue to be the case through 2013.

The Bank’s latest Business Outlook Survey also indicates that there is slack in the Canadian labour market, with a historically low proportion of firms reporting labour shortages (Chart 6) or pressures on production capacity (Chart 5).

Yesterday, Statistics Canada released the latest job vacancy numbers – there were 5.0 unemployed persons in Canada for every job vacancy in October.  This varies significantly by province, with Alberta and Saskatchewan being much lower than the national average at 1.7 unemployed persons per job vacancy, and Quebec (6.2) and Ontario (7.1) higher than the national average.

All this is to say, the evidence shows that there remains considerable slack in the Canadian labour market. If anyone in Ottawa was surprised by public backlash, anger, and fear around changes to Employment Insurance, they shouldn’t have been.  Many parts of Canada are still suffering the effects of the recession, and see no relief on the horizon. The government’s response to continued labour market weakness has been to penalize frequent claimants and restrict access to EI, a serious breach of trust for Canadians who need a helping hand in hard times.

 

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: January 23, 2013, 4:18 pm

Great post Angella though I wish somehow the numbers were going in a different direction. I have been doing a bit of research on Ontario’s economy and assessing its health. Almost every labour market number one examines shows a pattern that displays a large negative impact form the recession and a lift (or drop) into a different terrain. The noted involuntary part-timers being one. But on many different aspect it is a similar story, long term unemployed, the number of senior workers doubling, youth unemployment, manufacturing jobs, and now with a bit of a swing lower trend in public sector workers, employment in many of these aspects have been disturbed, and have not even remotely returned to pre-recession levels. That is precisely why, we need a brand new approach in Ontario- away from the Drummond austerity report. The new liberal leader could be faced with a very quite election unless they breath in a new culture of policy.

Have you ever looked at statcan poverty counts in Ontario- I was stunned at the grown in the last 10 years. yet somehow nobody talks much of it- using the lim50 method officially deemed individuals living in poverty has climbed from about 1.1 M in 2001 to almost 1.8 million last year. cansim table 202- 0804. And that is with a fairly conservative measure of poverty.

That is almost a doubling!!

However, the one measure that is pointed to for success is GDP. That is closer to recovery. But in this age of rising polarization- is it we have moved beyond recognizing that for a good part of the country the recession still is definitely in place and rotting away all that was good- austerity cannot kill the deficit beast- only growth. I am not sure why Ontario policy makers and more importantly voter have not woke up to such realities.

The truth is out there, do not let social reconstruction crews pull the carpet on us- austerity does not take long to bite- it is indeed a viper from the right and its venom is toxic.

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: January 28, 2013, 6:41 am

I am just looking at doing soem pre recession post recession data for various labour market analysis. I cannot seem to get to an agreement with any proven method for doing such comparisons. I.e. what is the best method to examine these values. Is it annual averages, quarterly comparison, moving averages of another fixed time period or month end cross sectional estimates? Of course the averages would use adjusted data, but if I use yearly or 12 month totals it would make more sense to use unadjusted.

Anybody with ideas or preferences on this? It does make a difference and I just read a TD report that uses quarterly comparisons on adjusted data, and I am not liking it.

Personally I am leaning towards Annual averages for square jan- dec annual measures, and 12 month moving averages of non square annual.

Write a comment





Related articles