Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Boom, Bust and Consolidation November 9, 2018
    The five largest bitumen-extractive corporations in Canada control 79.3 per cent of Canada’s productive capacity of bitumen. The Big Five—Suncor Energy, Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL), Cenovus Energy, Imperial Oil and Husky Energy—collectively control 90 per cent of existing bitumen upgrading capacity and are positioned to dominate Canada’s future oil sands development. In a sense they […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • A new Director for CCPA's BC Office: Message from Mary Childs, Board Chair October 24, 2018
    The CCPA-BC Board of Directors is delighted to share the news that Shannon Daub will be the next BC Director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Last spring, Seth Klein announced that, after 22 years, he would be stepping down as founding Director of the CCPA-BC at the end of 2018. The CCPA-BC’s board […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Who Owns Canada’s Fossil-Fuel Sector? October 15, 2018
    The major investors in Canada’s fossil-fuel sector have high stakes in maintaining business as usual rather than addressing the industry’s serious climate issues, says a new Corporate Mapping Project study.  And as alarms ring over our continued dependence on natural gas, coal and oil, these investors have both an interest in the continued growth of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Pharmacare consensus principles released today September 24, 2018
    A diverse coalition representing health care providers, non-profit organizations, workers, seniors, patients and academics has come together to issue a statement of consensus principles for the establishment of National Pharmacare in Canada. Our coalition believes that National Pharmacare should be a seamless extension of the existing universal health care system in Canada, which covers medically […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice September 19, 2018
    The CCPA is pleased to announce the creation of the Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice.This Fellowship is created to honour the legacy of senior researcher Kate McInturff who passed away in July 2018. Kate was a feminist trailblazer in public policy and gender-based research and achieved national acclaim for researching, writing, and producing CCPA’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Raising The OAS Eligibility Age Would Raise Poverty in Old Age

Canadian Press have put out a story based on a research paper by Richard Shillington which was commissioned by HRSDC from Informetrica, and obtained by the CLC through an Access to Information request.

Receiving OAS is required to makes seniors eligible for the GIS top up, which provides one in three seniors with a supplement which ensures they have a minimally adequate income in old age.

Raising the retirement age from age 65 to age 67 or higher would impact all future seniors, but would especially impact those who would qualify for the GIS supplement. Many older workers, especially the single, near elderly, already face very high rates of poverty.

As shown in Table 1, the OAS now contributes about one quarter of the incomes of Canadians aged 66 and 67, and the OAS and GIS in combination contribute about one third. The proportion of income replaced by the OAS/GIS is much higher for women and seniors with low incomes, about 70% for those with individual incomes of less than $15,000.

 

Table 1: OAS/GIS Contributions to the Income of Seniors (2006)

OAS OAS / GIS / Allowance



Age 66 26% 34%
Age 67 27% 36%



Women 65-69 29% 38%
Men 65-69 19% 26%



All Seniors 26% 36%



$5-$10,000 59% 71%
$10-15,000 37% 66%
$15-20,000 31% 49%
$20-25,000 25% 28%
$25-30,000 20% 21%
$50-55,000 10% 10%
$95-100,000 1% 1%



Source: Evaluation of the Old Age Security Program: Summary Report based on the LAD. Prepared for Human Resources and Skills Development Canada by Informetrica Limited, March 2009. Tables 24 and 25.

As shown in Table 2, the OAS/GIS makes a huge contribution to the reduction of poverty in old age. OAS/GIS reduces the low income rate (defined by the LIM Before Tax measure) from about 30% to about 12% (more for women than men).

Table 2: OAS/GIS Contribution to the Reduction of Poverty

Before After



Age 66 30% 12%
Age 67 32% 12%
Women Age 65-69 35% 14%
Men Age 65-69 27% 11%



Poverty Measure is Low Income Measure Before Tax (below one half of median adjusted for family size).
Source: Evaluation of the Old Age Security Program: Summary Report based on the LAD. Prepared for Human Resources and Skills Development Canada by Informetrica Limited, March 2009. Table 42.

 

Raising the age of eligibility for OAS/GIS would require future seniors with low incomes — those who would qualify for the GIS — to either save more, work much more hours, or to live in poverty. Saving more is not a realistic option for low income workers. And working longer is not a realistic option for many low income seniors who are in poor health, have a disability, or are providing care.  About one in four current retirees retired due to ill health.

Raising the age of eligibility for OAS/GIS would also mean that non-working, low income seniors on provincial social assistance and disability programs would have to wait to transition to OAS/GIS, raising social assistance costs for provincial governments. Costs of providing drugs and essential services to low income seniors unable to pay on their own would also increase

 

 

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Trudie Major
Time: July 26, 2012, 7:08 am

My sister lives in Buckingham, Quebec. She is a low income senior. She receives OAS, Regent de rent, and the supplement.
And she pays rent.
My question is, if she cannot afford new eye glasses if needed, and to replace her dentures, are there Essential Services to help her with this.
Can you please let me know. As we here in Ontario
have this benefit. Much appreciated.

Write a comment





Related articles