Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Boom, Bust and Consolidation November 9, 2018
    The five largest bitumen-extractive corporations in Canada control 79.3 per cent of Canada’s productive capacity of bitumen. The Big Five—Suncor Energy, Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL), Cenovus Energy, Imperial Oil and Husky Energy—collectively control 90 per cent of existing bitumen upgrading capacity and are positioned to dominate Canada’s future oil sands development. In a sense they […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • A new Director for CCPA's BC Office: Message from Mary Childs, Board Chair October 24, 2018
    The CCPA-BC Board of Directors is delighted to share the news that Shannon Daub will be the next BC Director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Last spring, Seth Klein announced that, after 22 years, he would be stepping down as founding Director of the CCPA-BC at the end of 2018. The CCPA-BC’s board […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Who Owns Canada’s Fossil-Fuel Sector? October 15, 2018
    The major investors in Canada’s fossil-fuel sector have high stakes in maintaining business as usual rather than addressing the industry’s serious climate issues, says a new Corporate Mapping Project study.  And as alarms ring over our continued dependence on natural gas, coal and oil, these investors have both an interest in the continued growth of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Pharmacare consensus principles released today September 24, 2018
    A diverse coalition representing health care providers, non-profit organizations, workers, seniors, patients and academics has come together to issue a statement of consensus principles for the establishment of National Pharmacare in Canada. Our coalition believes that National Pharmacare should be a seamless extension of the existing universal health care system in Canada, which covers medically […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice September 19, 2018
    The CCPA is pleased to announce the creation of the Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice.This Fellowship is created to honour the legacy of senior researcher Kate McInturff who passed away in July 2018. Kate was a feminist trailblazer in public policy and gender-based research and achieved national acclaim for researching, writing, and producing CCPA’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Federal cuts could push unemployment to 8%

Now that the government is planning for an $8 billion cut,  the potential job losses could drive job losses to between 99,000 and 108,000 full time positions across Canada.  At this much higher level, the federal government could be single-handedly responsible for pushing national unemployment from its current 7.5% to 8.0%.  About half of those losses would be federal public servants and half would be in the private sector (crown corporations, non-profits and government contractors).

The full post is available here

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: February 2, 2012, 9:45 am

I project a crash in employment much beyond 100K, I predict on our current pathway we will see a loss of 500K jobs minimum.

My huge fear is the following causal chain.

We have been relying on our resource extraction economy to help us make it through this downturn.

– however, the dollar suffers because of the dutch disease and commodity speculation

– manufacturing and forestry heartland of Ontario and Quebec gets beaten by the downturn and we lose over 600K jobs in manufacturing and over 200K in forestry since 2005 accelerating substantively in 2007.

– housing boom and construction jobs (still at all time highs), resource extraction in the private sector and a strong public sector keep the winds in our economic sail. Domestic demand is propped up by consumer debt which is now most likely at its peak and against the wall.

– however, it is a very delicate balance and the losses in manufacturing are not sustainable unless we get some longer term solutions, but none arrive because of govt policy.

– austerity starts setting in at three levels,- take Ontario, Rob Ford in TO will cut, the Drummond report in Ontario will cut and now Harper’s upcoming budget will cut, and all of the cuts seem to be heavily focused on public sector employment.

– this creates a strong negative push into the labour market and all the delicate balance between taxation and private public sectors sets about a self fulfilling goal of ratcheting down domestic demand.

– this creates new pressures on consumer debt, but because we are up against the debt wall, we start having pressure on the housing bubble. We either slowly deflate the bubble or it bursts. The point is, though, it will deflate without more consumers buying inflated housing.

– this creates two effects, first, consumption declines because of falling housing prices, even CMHC mortgages will decline. Secondly, this hits the construction sector, which as stated is the great, albeit short run equalizer for the declining manufacturing sector. More high paying jobs are trashed in construction.

– So now everybody losing a job basically finds employment in the increasingly precariousness of work which accelerates. Backed up by some very poor stripped down social safety nets and we are all soon working at Wal-MArt.

– so my 500K minimum jobs lost do not include precarious work effects.

so in the end my jobs lost would include

– 100k or more from public service cuts across the country
– 250k in construction as the housing bubble slows
– 100k in manufacturing as the high dollar continues to take its toll.

Call me a pessimist, I can take it.

By the way did anybody notice Philip Cross quit statcan, and did you take note of his remarks regarding how well the replacement voluntary survey went!

The key words in his departure- the new voluntary replacement census had a response rate of 69%. But as he stated as bad as that is, that does not include item non-response, meaning a survey could come back with just a name filled in and you were declared a response. Which means a whole lot of blank questionnaires and cells. Mass imputation has its uses and abuses!?

Comment from David Macdonald
Time: February 2, 2012, 9:48 am

I don’t think I’m quite as pessimistic as you Paul, but you’re right that there are serious downside risks here and a contractionary policy from the federal government that matches the coming austerity at the provincial levels spells bad news for Canadians.

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: February 2, 2012, 1:19 pm

Yes i probably am a bit off, but if you factor in downstream jobs, especially if we see construction falter, who knows. I am sure the multipliers from the public sector alone must behave to be 3-1.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: February 2, 2012, 7:50 pm

Ok but just imagine the multi is 1. And imagine that employment stays a 7.4% for the next two years because of austerity in the public sector. What the government is basically doing is ensuring that cyclical unemployment becomes structural. And you can get to that critique using off the shelf turn key macro.

There is zero rational for public austerity. Even the so called structural deficit could be solved via a promise by the government to hike the GST by 2 cents when and if the recovery takes hold (defined as 6% unemployment or less). If the NDP was smart that is what they would be demanding the government do. Hell even Flash Gordon would have to praise the idea.

Comment from Todd
Time: February 2, 2012, 9:03 pm

Travis wrote:

“There is zero rational for public austerity.”

Well, it does keep the plebs good and docile, not to mention it’s perfectly ideological for neo-libs to do this sort of thing.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: February 4, 2012, 7:12 pm

“Well, it does keep the plebs good and docile, not to mention it’s perfectly ideological for neo-libs to do this sort of thing.”

Yep and they have four years left so if the economy is in the toilet 3 years from now they can send suitcases full of cash to conservative districts and make it seem like a recovery has started and rationalize austerity. It is not so much genius rather it is pure cynicism.

Comment from T Manderly
Time: February 13, 2012, 11:57 pm

Their goal is to suppress wages by creating a labour surplus…

Unfortunately it is being done by eviscerating the middle class and causing mass misery…

The other compounding factor is the rising price of food

Write a comment





Related articles