Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

When Will The Baby Boomers Retire?

Canada’s population, we are frequently told, is rapidly aging. The big baby boomer cohort is headed out of the workforce, meaning  that we face a future of very slow labour force growth and even possible shortages of workers. CIBC Economics has just gone so far as to argue that the Bank of Canada can afford to be more relaxed about unemployment due to demographic changes which will lower the demand for jobs.

Canada’s rate of labour force growth will indeed be slowing. Everybody gets one year older with every year that passes, and the large baby boom generation will indeed stop working some day. We do already see some shortages of workers with specific skill sets in specific areas of the country.

But it is worth underlining that the immediate issue – and the issue that will last for several more years at least  – is high unemployment,  NOT  generalized labour shortages. We do not have enough jobs to employ both the baby boomers who are putting off retirement, and their children who are still entering the work force in large numbers.

If we look at the data for older workers for 2000 to 2011, we see two things. The number and proportion of of older workers aged 55 and over has been increasing as the population ages.  This depresses the labour force participation rate to some degree, as older workers are less likely to participate than core age workers aged 25 to 54. But, and this is a very big but, the participation rate of older workers has been steadily and quite dramatically rising.

As shown in the Chart below, the participation rate of all sub groups of older workers has been rising steadily since 2000, from 62.7% to 73.0% for persons aged 55 to 59; from 36.2% to 51.1% for those aged 60 to 64, and from 11.4% to 23.9% for those aged 65. to 69.  The increase has been especially pronounced for women. In 2011, the participation rate for women aged 60 to 64 was 44.5%, up from 27.0% in 2000, and the participation rate of women aged 65 to 69 was 18.2% compared to just 7.1% in 2000. (Data from CANSIM Table 282-0002.)

While the leading edge of the baby boom generation are now entering their 60s.,  the bulk of them are just entering the 55 to 59 age group, and many seem set to stay in the workforce for many years, particularly if the labour force participation rates of those in their 60s continues to increase in the future as it has in the past decade.

No one can forecast the future trend with certainty, but but it can be noted that there was an especially big jump in the participation rate of older workers after the stock market collapse of 2002. (The participation rate of those aged 55 to 59 jumped from 63.8% to 67.7% between 2003 and 2011.)  The decline of defined benefit pension plan coverage combined with big hits to retirement savings because of  low interest rates and depressed equities seem to have definitively killed “Freedom 55.”

In sum,  the work force may be aging, but not enough to stop us from worrying about unemployment.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Enhanced Annuity Specialist
Time: January 19, 2012, 3:57 am

‘Freedom 55’ is not a term I have heard in the UK, but I can relate to your article. Many in the population rely on state benefits alone and barely survive retirement. The problem is the state pension age is constantly being increased to the point where I expect for me it will be 70. I then ask myself, could I even work until this age due to health etc, what would I do without my own pension provision?

The average pension pot in the UK is £27,000 a measly figure to fund the suppossed best years of your life! As you put ‘The decline of defined benefit pension plan coverage combined with big hits to retirement savings because of low interest rates and depressed equities’ has definately dashed many peoples hope or retiring anytime before they are 65!

Write a comment





Related articles