Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Report looks at captured nature of BC’s Oil and Gas Commission August 6, 2019
    From an early stage, BC’s Oil and Gas Commission bore the hallmarks of a captured regulator. The very industry that the Commission was formed to regulate had a significant hand in its creation and, too often, the interests of the industry it regulates take precedence over the public interest. This report looks at the evolution […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Correcting the Record July 26, 2019
    Earlier this week Kris Sims and Franco Terrazzano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation wrote an opinion piece that was published in the Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, Winnipeg Sun, Ottawa Sun and Toronto Sun. The opinion piece makes several false claims and connections regarding the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), which we would like to correct. The […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Rental Wage in Canada July 18, 2019
    Our new report maps rental affordability in neighbourhoods across Canada by calculating the “rental wage,” which is the hourly wage needed to afford an average apartment without spending more than 30% of one’s earnings.  Across all of Canada, the average wage needed to afford a two-bedroom apartment is $22.40/h, or $20.20/h for an average one […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada July 9, 2019
    CCPA senior economist David Macdonald co-authored a new report, Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada­—released by Upstream Institute in partnership with the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)—tracks child poverty rates using Census 2006, the 2011 National Household Survey and Census 2016. The report is available for […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Fossil-Power Top 50 launched July 3, 2019
    What do Suncor, Encana, the Royal Bank of Canada, the Fraser Institute and 46 other companies and organizations have in common? They are among the entities that make up the most influential fossil fuel industry players in Canada. Today, the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP) is drawing attention to these powerful corporations and organizations with the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Electile Dysfunction

Evidence suggests that we all like it long.

Mayors of Canada like it long. It helps them prioritize the next transit or water main development.

Police like it long. It helps them decide how to recruit, to reflect the changing communities they serve.

Medical researchers like it long. It helps them see patterns of disease, which helps find cures.

Business entrepreneurs like it long. It helps them launch a new product or service.

School boards like it long. It helps them pinpoint where to build new schools.

Boy Scouts and other after-school programs like it long. It helps them target the neighbourhoods that need more options for youngsters.

Large foundations and charities like it long. It helps them prioritize where to place their money.

Clergy like it long. It helps them discern where their flocks are headed.

Public health officials like it long. It helps them roll out immunization strategies during epidemics.

The international community likes it long. It helps us all look over each others’ shoulders and compare notes in reliable, consistent ways.

Even Stephen Harper secretly likes it long. It helps his team target which “ethnic” or otherwise vote-rich ridings to rustle up for the election.

Over the years we’ve learned that evidence from the mandatory long-form census questionnaire helps us make sharper, more effective decisions.

Then along comes Stephen Harper and decides to cut those practices short, for Canadians from every walk of life and governments of every political stripe.

It seems a classic case of denial. After all our PM uses the data as much as the rest of us, perhaps more. And, like a moth to the flame, he’s running headlong into the story one more time.

Stephen Harper had his pick of what day to send Canadians to the polls. He chose May 2nd. Irony of ironies, May 2nd is also the day the Census starts getting mailed out to you and me.

Well, that’s the Census short-form questionnaire, the one everyone has to answer. It’s basically a head-count of where the males and females of our nation live, how many people live with us, our ages, and whether we speak English or French.

The long-form questionnaire will go out about a month later. It’s the one the Harper Team says is intrusive and that you shouldn’t have to answer. Never mind they are asking all the same questions in the new, improved model.

At an additional cost of $30 million, the government will send the questionnaire to one in three households instead of one in five. (That means the odds of your household receiving it just jumped from twice, maybe three times in your life to 4 or 5 times.) The difference is that instead of numerous follow-ups with households that don’t reply, there will be just one follow-up….and an ad campaign. Instead of it being mandatory, an act of citizenship that helps serve your interests and mine, it will be “whatever”.

We’ve just been through the worst global economic crisis in 80 years. Almost half a million full-time jobs were wiped out in the space of 9 months.

So, almost three years into it, how did Canadians weather the storm? How many of us are back on track, compared to 2006? How many of us aren’t?

The Harper government doesn’t think we need to know in any reliable way.

The government has been fully briefed by Statistics Canada about the implications of switching the census long-form questionnaire from a mandatory census to a voluntary survey.

Stephen Harper knows the collected information will be more than useless. It will be dangerous. Because it will produce misinformation. That’s because it won’t be a full picture. The emphasis on voluntary response means less follow-up, and higher non-response rates from all the people who are too busy or too worn out to reply: immigrants; aboriginals; the ill, the disabled, the aged; low-income households; students and other young people; time-stressed young families; the bankers and the bosses too.

The Prime Minister knows all this, and yet he has stubbornly stuck to his decision despite this knowledge….perhaps because of it.

It’s a decision that can and must be reversed.

The timing is tight but it’s not impossible to get Census 2011 mostly right. Here’s what the next government would have to do:

1) Direct Statistics Canada to undertake the usual number of follow-ups to the 2011 long-form questionnaire, to insure the highest possible response rate in the coming weeks.
2) Conduct a comprehensive evaluation of Census 2011 results within 12 months, to identify where the worst non-response biases are, and attempt to correct them.
3) Provide Statistics Canada with sufficient additional revenues for these undertakings, in order to avoid cutting back on other surveys.
4) Reinstate the mandatory long form census questionnaire

We give governments power so that they serve our interests. On May 2nd, we need to make sure we count, and not just at election time.

Postcript: You can download your very own “I Like It Long!” bumper sticker, courtesy of the Save The Census Coalition.

Enjoy and share:


Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: April 26, 2011, 12:02 am

Given the extra money being spent on the current voluntary long form and the extra money you mentioned that could be used to do some sort of an over sampling ‘ post hoc ‘ in high non-response areas. (I am thinking that violates a few sampling laws, as one needs to draw the sample at the same time, ( I have been down this road!)), so adding these two costs, could we not just delay the long form. I am sure plans are in place, but given the extra sampling costs and non- response damage and then fixing it, I would think a delay is better, say by 6 months. Draw up a new sample using the old 20% method, change the voluntary, and spend extra on an education and awareness campaign to try and eradicate the Harper damage done to the national survey culture. I think it might be cheaper and also be more reliable.

Of Course I do not have all of the info on timing and resources, so it may not be feasible to delay.

Comment from John Stapleton
Time: April 26, 2011, 6:46 am

When all the history books are finally written, we usually discover why a policy was made. But the decision to end the long form census and the cancellation of PALS may be one set of decisions impervious to historical detective work or archaeology. As Armine points out, Harper benefits from the long form and what they are going to do will be more expensive and far less reliable.
Libertarians were left scratching their heads and my father, an amateur genaeologist stopped donating to the Conservatives for the first time in living memory.
We are all the poorer for the decision and as I tried to point out in an article for the Mark:
we will be less knowledgeable about our fellow Canadians than we were on July 1, 1867.

Comment from Iglika Ivanova
Time: April 26, 2011, 1:54 pm

Given seasonal fluctuations in employment and such, wouldn’t it be important to keep the survey month consistent with the old Census data? It comes right after tax season for most, so incomes are likely reported more accurately than otherwise. Of course, this doesn’t apply to the self-employed, who don’t have to file a return until later in the summer but still.

Comment from Purple Library Guy
Time: April 26, 2011, 3:45 pm

It’s an explicitly negative-sum game. Losing the long form hurts Harper, but he’s betting it will hurt his enemies even more. As to the collateral damage to the country in general, he doesn’t care about that. His politics is, in the end, strictly a struggle for dominance. If he can impair the political forces tending to oppose him more than he impairs his own, that’s a net win, and externalities be damned.
It’s my impression that the right tends to find eliminating information, knowledge and education a net win in that sense. This is just a particularly egregious example.

Comment from Paul T.
Time: April 27, 2011, 11:54 am

I believe respondents are asked for their income data and is interpreted as tax data. The item non-response is imputed using Tax data. Mass imputation is also using tax data.

BUt changing the date will have an impact for sure, but I do think it would be less than the massive non-response from the voluntary. Maybe a year delay is more feasible. I do think some kind of plan B is in the works and timing rather than a follow up survey is the way to go on this. The survey Frame from the short form does suffer some decay the more one delays, but it still does not effect it as much as mass non-response.

A study could be conducted to examine these aspects, and I hope somewhere at Statcan they are planning such, in the event of a Tory fail on MAy 2.

Write a comment

Related articles