Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

TFSA: Just The Facts Ma’am

Here are the most important facts about the Tax Free Savings Account. Will blog further on this tomorrow.

Introduction of the Tax Free Savings Account: January 1, 2009, right at the height of the economic meltdown

What’s new: Stephen Harper promises to double the contribution limits to the Tax Free Savings Account, from $5,000 a year to $10,000.


Average After-tax income of Canadian individuals in 2008: $31,400

Median after-tax income of Canadian individuals in 2008: $25,400

Drop in number of full-time jobs in the recession, from peak to trough:
465,000 (in seasonally adjusted terms)

Proportion of Canadian households that saved in 2009: 57% (43% did not) (Source: Statistics Canada, custom data ordered by CCPA, to be released soon)

Cost of TFSA to public treasury, as estimated by Budget 2008: $920 million over first five years of implementation, $3 billion a year upon full operationalization

Number of accounts by end of 2010: 4.8 million

Eligible population (18+): estimated to be approx 26 million

Proportion of Canadians who took advantage: 18% (would be a lower share of all Canadian households, since some families will have several members with accounts)

Amount of money in TFSA accounts by end of 2010: $19 billion

Canadians’ Number One Concern: Healthcare

Canadians’ Second Concern: Jobs

Enjoy and share:


Comment from Erin Weir
Time: April 8, 2011, 12:07 am

Let’s be clear that $3 billion annually is the projected cost of TFSAs to the federal treasury. Since TFSAs also avoid provincial tax, they could easily cost provincial treasuries a further $1.5 billion annually.

Doubling the contribution limit would not quite double the cost since more people can afford to contribute $5,000 than $10,000. But between it and income splitting, the Conservatives are promising to punch a multi-billion-dollar hole in future federal and provincial budgets.

Comment from lana payne
Time: April 8, 2011, 2:42 am

Hi Armine,

Just a couple of questions. Of the 4.8 million with TFSAs, how many are actually saving the max and who are they income bracket wise? In other words, by increasing the max level of contributions, who benefits – seems like it could be a small number?


Comment from Armine Yalnizyan
Time: April 9, 2011, 5:27 am

Hey Lana
I trust the answer to your question is clear in the next post, Who Benefits from the TFSA?.

A bit more about this important question:

The number of people and the amount they put into their accounts won’t register with CRA statistics (tax stats). The budgetary impact will never be published in an annual tax expenditure or pubic accounts report.

So no public record of the impact of this measure, but the information is out there, in the private sphere. The banks have it: the number of accounts, the amount deposited in each annually. Not obliged to share it of course, but that’s where Flaherty got his numbers for the statement that I cite on the numbers and amount of assets. So if they want to talk about it they will. If not, well, none of our business I guess.

Furthermore, don’t think there is any system that will ever link accounts to show what a small number of families benefited from the full tax saving room – and the TFSA is designed in a way that encourages people to turn their family into a tax shelter.

As soon as they turn 18, I give my kids the max and my financial advisor invests it to get the highest returns, pooling with other deposits put aside in the family.

The returns can pay for grandkids’ education or subsidize/upgrade housing options or whatnot, thanks to the willingness of the Canadian electorate to shield the growth in unearned income through investments from taxes.

The grandkids get to take a ride on an even bigger gravy train, through the magic of compound interest.

Holy shades of plutocracy batman! No wonder it was hailed as a “revolutionary” new tax reform by accountants and the financial industry.

We introduced inheritance taxes and high marginal tax rates to stop this sort of thing – not sure if introduced in the wake of World War One, when income taxes introduced; or in the 1940s, during World War II. Repealed in 1972 by Trudeau, and replaced by a capital gains tax.

Yes anyone who can save can take advantage. But it’s not for the average joe (at an average after-tax income of $31K, whose going to put aside $10K????) And just because lower income people contribute the max doesn’t mean they are thrifty. It could mean someone else is supporting them.

Comment from mark
Time: April 12, 2011, 10:17 pm

Wow I never thought I would see the day when the “progressives” come right out and admit the focus of their ideas to prevent the success others through their own initiative and thrift.

It is wonderful that a family can achieve significant wealth in a couple of generations by saving relatively small amounts of money.

Somehow I save almost 10k per year despite never earning more than 45,000 per year… put down the fancy cell phones and pick up a library card.

I think it is also odd for an “economist” to refer to investment earnings as “unearned”. To get this return I have to do two things… 1. I have to part with ownership of the cash for a period of time, this of course is opportunity cost I incur. 2. If I invest looking for higher returns I need to take risk.

Structures like the TSFA allow a regular working guy like me the chance to better my families financial condition both now and over time.

Write a comment

Related articles