Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Distributional impact of Tory Income Splitting

I recently posted on the CCPA’s “Making it Count” blog covering election 2011 issues. In that post, I calculated the distributional impacts of the “Family Tax Cut” proposed by the Conservatives that would allow couples with children under 18yrs old to split up to $50,000 of their income. The “Making it Count” post is meant for popular consumption, but I figured readers might be interested in the full shebang so below is a more complete breakdown of who would benefit from the “Family Tax Cut” and by how much.

You’ll note that my estimates put the total cost at $2.7 billlion slightly higher than the Conservatives at $2.5 billion but the most important piece is how strongly the distribution of benefits skews to the wealthiest families.

(Click on thumbnail to see the full table)Distributional Impact


Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Iglika Ivanova
Time: April 1, 2011, 9:40 am

Wow.

Nice work, David. What dataset did you use for this?

Comment from David Macdonald
Time: April 1, 2011, 9:44 am

Largely the census data for the number of families. As for distribution of household earnings the Library of Parliament study on income distribution was useful. From there I constructed a simplified tax model to calculate before and after savings.

Comment from Joan
Time: April 1, 2011, 3:00 pm

What is also very interesting is the source of this bizarre policy to come into effect if and when the budget is balanced. Yesterday I heard a spokesperson from that most religious, right, American of institutions, the Council for Marriage and Families, state that he has been advocating this for the 5 years since it has been welcomed into Canada by our most religious, right government. This is very concerning, especially as, if given a majority, this particular group will be given ever more influence on the way our country is governed.

Comment from Kathleen Lahey
Time: April 3, 2011, 1:23 pm

Joan — See my comment in the Apr. 2 2010 Ottawa Citizen on the genealogy of income splitting in Canada. The Institute on Marriage and the Family Canada is just the tip of the iceberg. They plus Harper plus Mintz have created the claim of a ‘movement’ in support of this issue; in reality, this is just an old Reformer dream. (Of Harper’s?)

Comment from Angela Browne
Time: April 4, 2011, 12:42 pm

… and even if the shoe were on the other foot and my husband were the sole earner, I would not be staying at home, as nobody gave me any kind of financial guarantee for my marriage. Something can happen to him and we are both S-O-L, or he can decide to trade me in for a newer model, while I stayed home most of the time and thus, no job skills … I grew up in a household like that. My father earned great money and my mom stayed home; they divorced when I was eight, and she spent several years in poverty until she was able to finally secure a job in the civil service. A policy like this encouraged and aids and abets child poverty in the future, and is certainly not acceptable to me.

Write a comment





Related articles