Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Report looks at captured nature of BC’s Oil and Gas Commission August 6, 2019
    From an early stage, BC’s Oil and Gas Commission bore the hallmarks of a captured regulator. The very industry that the Commission was formed to regulate had a significant hand in its creation and, too often, the interests of the industry it regulates take precedence over the public interest. This report looks at the evolution […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Correcting the Record July 26, 2019
    Earlier this week Kris Sims and Franco Terrazzano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation wrote an opinion piece that was published in the Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, Winnipeg Sun, Ottawa Sun and Toronto Sun. The opinion piece makes several false claims and connections regarding the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), which we would like to correct. The […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Rental Wage in Canada July 18, 2019
    Our new report maps rental affordability in neighbourhoods across Canada by calculating the “rental wage,” which is the hourly wage needed to afford an average apartment without spending more than 30% of one’s earnings.  Across all of Canada, the average wage needed to afford a two-bedroom apartment is $22.40/h, or $20.20/h for an average one […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada July 9, 2019
    CCPA senior economist David Macdonald co-authored a new report, Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada­—released by Upstream Institute in partnership with the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)—tracks child poverty rates using Census 2006, the 2011 National Household Survey and Census 2016. The report is available for […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Fossil-Power Top 50 launched July 3, 2019
    What do Suncor, Encana, the Royal Bank of Canada, the Fraser Institute and 46 other companies and organizations have in common? They are among the entities that make up the most influential fossil fuel industry players in Canada. Today, the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP) is drawing attention to these powerful corporations and organizations with the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Happiness and Inequality Revisited

I was correctly chided for my earlier post on the connection between inequality and happiness, and thanks for the comments. My thinking was also clarified by hearing Wilkinson deliver a fabulous lecture to the Ottawa Economics Association this week.

Wilkinson and  Pickett’s central argument is that the connection between income inequality and a wide range of measures of well-being – from health to fear of crime – runs through stress and anxiety. People in more equal and solidaristic societies enjoy better outcomes, and might also be expected to be more satisfied with their lives. Objective and subjective well being should overlap to a considerable degree.

I find on a cursory examination that this indeed seems to be broadly true for Canada.

The Tables below present data on income inequality and on happiness by province. The former series – taken from HRSDC social indicators – is the ratio of the top to bottom quintile of after tax family income.  Provinces are ranked from most to least equal. The latter – taken from the recent CSLS study – is the percentage of persons saying they are very satisfied or satisfied with their lives.

The second Table shows that the order of provinces ranked from most to least equal corresponds fairly closely with the order of provinces ranked from most to least happy. It is notable that the two pole provinces are the same – PEI and Newfoundland are the most equal and the most happy – while Ontario and BC are the least equal and the least happy.

Some enterprising person with more time and methodological talent than I should use the HRSDC social indicators to do Wilkinson and Pickett style gradients for the Canadian provinces linking income inequality to health, crime and other outcomes.

Inequality Happiness
PEI 6.2 94.08
NL 7.9 93.44
NS 7.9 91.70
NB 7.6 93.28
Que 8.1 92.13
Man 8.1 91.95
Sask 8.8 92.23
AB 8.9 92.11
ON 9.3 90.18
BC 10.1 90.57
Rank Order Inequality Happiness
PEI 1 1
NL 2 2
NS 3 8
NB 4 3
Que 5 7
Man 6 6
Sask 7 4
AB 8 5
ON 9 10
BC 10 9
Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Paul tulloch
Time: December 11, 2010, 1:20 pm

Good idea, Andrew, starting out a new project soon looking at the declining middle class. I do think the various outcomes could be grouped in a multivarIate dimension and reclassified then compared back to these measures.

Comment from Rick Goldman
Time: December 11, 2010, 9:17 pm

Very illuminating data, Andrew. I will definitely use this in a McGill social work entitled Poverty and Inequality, that I teach. I am sure you are also aware of Linda McQuaig and Neil Brooks new book on poverty and inequality, The Trouble with Billionaires. If anyone is interested, here’s the link to a short review I have written of it: http://www.montrealgazette.com/entertainment/Linda+McQuaig+Neil+Brooks+take+economic+inequality+Trouble+with/3918953/story.html?id=3918953

Comment from rcp
Time: December 12, 2010, 6:41 pm

I’m reluctant to let politicians appropriate the goal of happiness – they will almost certainly just talk more nonsense. But if you really want to cite the CSLS survey, you might want to cite their conclusion:

“We find that evidence from Canada suggests that mental health status, sense of belonging, physical health, and stress level are more
significant determinants of happiness than household income.”

Not much grist for the economic mill.

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: December 12, 2010, 7:32 pm

not sure of RCP has ever heard of intervening variables, but I certainly think income has a root causation in each of the variables mentioned, and secondly we are talking about inequality.

And hey, only a progressive would even think of trying to measure happiness, so if we can measure the notion of profit down to ever bean counting molecule of cost, then why can we not at least try and measure happiness. (armies and armies of accountants and lawyers measuring cost, but no one anywhere measuring happiness, too bad we have such poor design to our social institutions.)

Comment from rcp
Time: December 13, 2010, 6:50 am

Thanks, Paul, but I do know some stats. Since the CSLS study is a regression study, I think you might be hinting at some collinearity, and I agree that could be the case. Nonetheless, what I quoted is what they concluded.

And I am really, really dubious about designing social policy based on average self-reported happiness rather than something a little more objective like the proportion of people below the low-income cutoff. You may disagree.

Comment from andrew jackson
Time: December 13, 2010, 7:02 am

I think the csls conclusion might be modified to say the distribution of income is more important to subjective well being than the average level.

RCP – I prefer objective indicators as well, and note that people in very hierarchical societies may well be happy – as in Brave New World

Comment from rcp
Time: December 13, 2010, 8:50 am

Andrew: I was thinking of “The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas”, but Brave New Wold is a good example too.

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: December 13, 2010, 3:39 pm

income is the root, now we could all live in poverty and be equal in terms of happiness, ie.e unhappiness. But at some point along the income scale, the others kick in to contribute to happiness, and then the rest drives off of income. So no, I would not say collinear, I would say intervening and then would display some kind of correlation. I do not think it is actually linear, although I do accept we all wanna think in straight lines, which is fine i guess unless one is living somewhere along that lineear where it is not actually linear.

I agree low income cut offs are good bit more objective.

However if we truly had a society that actually focused on people, we would have a measure that indeed would go a long ways more into defining happiness, free from hunger, angst, stress, shelter and some other measures that rarely make the national spreadsheet. during these times of economic decline, they are more important than ever.

licos are not sufficient

Write a comment





Related articles