Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Imagine a Winnipeg...2018 Alternative Municipal Budget June 18, 2018
    Climate change; stagnant global economic growth; political polarization; growing inequality.  Our city finds itself dealing with all these issues, and more at once. The 2018 Alternative Municipal Budget (AMB) is a community response that shows how the city can deal with all these issues and balance the budget.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Why would a boom town need charity? Inequities in Saskatchewan’s oil boom and bust May 23, 2018
    When we think of a “boomtown,” we often imagine a formerly sleepy rural town suddenly awash in wealth and economic expansion. It might surprise some to learn that for many municipalities in oil-producing regions in Saskatchewan, the costs of servicing the oil boom can outweigh the benefits. A Prairie Patchwork: Reliance on Oil Industry Philanthropy […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA's National Office has moved! May 11, 2018
      The week of May 1st, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives' National Office moved to 141 Laurier Ave W, Suite 1000, Ottawa ON, K1P 5J2. Please note that our phone, fax and general e-mail will remain the same: Telephone: 613-563-1341 | Fax: 613-233-1458 | Email: ccpa@policyalternatives.ca  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • What are Canada’s energy options in a carbon-constrained world? May 1, 2018
    Canada faces some very difficult choices in maintaining energy security while meeting emissions reduction targets.  A new study by veteran earth scientist David Hughes—published through the Corporate Mapping Project, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the Parkland Institute—is a comprehensive assessment of Canada’s energy systems in light of the need to maintain energy security and […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2018 Living Wage for Metro Vancouver April 25, 2018
    The cost of raising a family in British Columbia increased slightly from 2017 to 2018. A $20.91 hourly wage is needed to cover the costs of raising a family in Metro Vancouver, up from $20.61 per hour in 2017 due to soaring housing costs. This is the hourly wage that two working parents with two young children […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Taxpayers and the Census

My union was among many organizations listed in opposition to the senseless census decision in Wednesday’s Globe and Mail editorial. Three organizations were listed as supporting it.

The Fraser Institute and National Citizens’ Coalition have understandable motives for wanting to eliminate the mandatory long form. First, there are libertarian “privacy” concerns.

Second, depriving the government of reliable census data would undermine public programs that these groups dislike. Third, lower response rates at lower income levels (and perhaps among the super rich) would assist them in downplaying poverty and inequality.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) might take the same position for the same reasons. But by all accounts, replacing the mandatory long form with a more widely distributed and advertised voluntary questionnaire would significantly increase census costs.

The Fraser Institute and National Citizens’ Coalition can somewhat coherently argue for spending more public money on right-wing initiatives. However, the CTF is supposedly focussed on saving tax dollars (in order to facilitate tax cuts). As I point out in today’s Globe and Mail, that mandate is hard to square with advocating a more expensive census:

The price of ideology

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is listed as supporting the federal government’s census decision (Government That Listens? – editorial, Aug. 4). By all accounts, replacing the mandatory long-form census with a more widely distributed and advertised voluntary questionnaire would significantly increase census costs. Is the Federation actually committed to saving tax dollars or does it expect taxpayers to finance conservative ideological causes?

Erin Weir, economist, United Steelworkers, Toronto

This inconsistency may explain the CTF’s changing tune. A month ago, its BC director applauded the government’s decision.

More recently, its federal/Ontario director seemed to question the government’s priorities: “the Prime Minister would rather burn up political capital reforming the census than the Senate.” (Of course, an elected Senate would also entail additional public expenditure.)

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Kevin Gaudet
Time: August 6, 2010, 2:06 pm

Erin, why am I not shocked you didn’t bother to check your facts before you wrote your piece?

The census long form has not been an issue for the CTF. It is peculiar for the government to burn up precious political capital on an issue even its usual supporters care little about. Having said that, in principle it is fine that they want to end making it mandatory. Further, it is a waste of money to send it out so widely. Instead of the $30 million, it should just be scrapped.

Kevin Gaudet
Federal Director
Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: August 7, 2010, 4:45 am

Which facts did I fail to check? Your BC director expressed approval that “The federal government has replaced the mandatory long form with a voluntary survey.” I also linked to your critique of the government’s use of political capital.

As you know, my letter was in response to The Globe and Mail’s editorial. If you feel that this editorial somehow misrepresented the CTF’s position, you should submit a letter or ask The Globe to print a correction.

Comment from Darwin O’Connor
Time: August 7, 2010, 2:58 pm

You shouldn’t assume that the everyone in the Canadian Taxpayers Federation agree on everything. Just because one director says something, doesn’t mean it is the policy of the whole organization.

The bloggers on the Progressive Economics Forum don’t always agree either.

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: August 7, 2010, 4:11 pm

The PEF, as an organization, does not have official policy positions. But my understanding is that the CTF routinely takes policy positions as an organization. The Globe and Mail listed the CTF as supporting the government’s census changes and a CTF spokesperson had indeed expressed support.

Comment from Kelsey Kirkland
Time: August 7, 2010, 10:10 pm

@Kevin Gaudet You are advocating that the long form census be scrapped altogether because it costs taxpayers $30 million. That is the kind of thinking process’ that PM Harper and NDP Layton used last time when they advocated Canadians not to call elections to save $300 million.

This calls for some kind of a SmartAlecs award.

Comment from Morgan
Time: August 9, 2010, 4:06 am

In response to my email query a couple weeks ago, “I am wondering if this posting by Maureen Bader (http://www.taxpayer.com/blog/12-07-2010/fond-farewell-forced-census) is your organization’s position on the government’s decision to scrap the mandatory long-form census questionnaire?”, Mr. Kevin Gaudet responded: “I agree with Maureen’s position. I am the federal spokesperson.”

Write a comment





Related articles