Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • With regional management BC’s iconic forest industry can benefit British Columbians rather than multinational corporations January 17, 2018
    Forests are one of the iconic symbols of British Columbia, and successive governments and companies operating here have largely focussed on the cheap, commodity lumber business that benefits industry. Former provincial forestry minister Bob Williams, who has been involved with the industry for five decades, proposes regional management of this valuable natural resource to benefit […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Community Economic Development in Manitoba - a new film January 16, 2018
    Cinameteque, Jan 23.  7:00 pm - Free event Film Trailer CCEDNET-MB, CCPA-MB, The Manitoba Research Alliance and Rebel Sky Media presents: The Inclusive Economy:  Stories of Community Economic Development in Manitoba
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Winnipeg's State of the Inner City 2018 January 3, 2018
    Winnipeg's community-based organizations are standing on shakey ground and confused about how to proceed with current provincial governement measurements.  Read the 2018 State of the Inner City Report.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Our Schools/Our Selves: Winter 2018 is online now! December 18, 2017
    For the first time, this winter we are making Our Schools/Our Selves available in its entirety online. This issue of Our Schools/Our Selves focuses on a number of key issues that education workers, parents, students, and public education advocates are confronting in schools and communities, and offers on-the-ground commentary and analysis of what needs to […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Taxpayers and the Census

My union was among many organizations listed in opposition to the senseless census decision in Wednesday’s Globe and Mail editorial. Three organizations were listed as supporting it.

The Fraser Institute and National Citizens’ Coalition have understandable motives for wanting to eliminate the mandatory long form. First, there are libertarian “privacy” concerns.

Second, depriving the government of reliable census data would undermine public programs that these groups dislike. Third, lower response rates at lower income levels (and perhaps among the super rich) would assist them in downplaying poverty and inequality.

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation (CTF) might take the same position for the same reasons. But by all accounts, replacing the mandatory long form with a more widely distributed and advertised voluntary questionnaire would significantly increase census costs.

The Fraser Institute and National Citizens’ Coalition can somewhat coherently argue for spending more public money on right-wing initiatives. However, the CTF is supposedly focussed on saving tax dollars (in order to facilitate tax cuts). As I point out in today’s Globe and Mail, that mandate is hard to square with advocating a more expensive census:

The price of ideology

The Canadian Taxpayers Federation is listed as supporting the federal government’s census decision (Government That Listens? – editorial, Aug. 4). By all accounts, replacing the mandatory long-form census with a more widely distributed and advertised voluntary questionnaire would significantly increase census costs. Is the Federation actually committed to saving tax dollars or does it expect taxpayers to finance conservative ideological causes?

Erin Weir, economist, United Steelworkers, Toronto

This inconsistency may explain the CTF’s changing tune. A month ago, its BC director applauded the government’s decision.

More recently, its federal/Ontario director seemed to question the government’s priorities: “the Prime Minister would rather burn up political capital reforming the census than the Senate.” (Of course, an elected Senate would also entail additional public expenditure.)

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Kevin Gaudet
Time: August 6, 2010, 2:06 pm

Erin, why am I not shocked you didn’t bother to check your facts before you wrote your piece?

The census long form has not been an issue for the CTF. It is peculiar for the government to burn up precious political capital on an issue even its usual supporters care little about. Having said that, in principle it is fine that they want to end making it mandatory. Further, it is a waste of money to send it out so widely. Instead of the $30 million, it should just be scrapped.

Kevin Gaudet
Federal Director
Canadian Taxpayers Federation

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: August 7, 2010, 4:45 am

Which facts did I fail to check? Your BC director expressed approval that “The federal government has replaced the mandatory long form with a voluntary survey.” I also linked to your critique of the government’s use of political capital.

As you know, my letter was in response to The Globe and Mail’s editorial. If you feel that this editorial somehow misrepresented the CTF’s position, you should submit a letter or ask The Globe to print a correction.

Comment from Darwin O’Connor
Time: August 7, 2010, 2:58 pm

You shouldn’t assume that the everyone in the Canadian Taxpayers Federation agree on everything. Just because one director says something, doesn’t mean it is the policy of the whole organization.

The bloggers on the Progressive Economics Forum don’t always agree either.

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: August 7, 2010, 4:11 pm

The PEF, as an organization, does not have official policy positions. But my understanding is that the CTF routinely takes policy positions as an organization. The Globe and Mail listed the CTF as supporting the government’s census changes and a CTF spokesperson had indeed expressed support.

Comment from Kelsey Kirkland
Time: August 7, 2010, 10:10 pm

@Kevin Gaudet You are advocating that the long form census be scrapped altogether because it costs taxpayers $30 million. That is the kind of thinking process’ that PM Harper and NDP Layton used last time when they advocated Canadians not to call elections to save $300 million.

This calls for some kind of a SmartAlecs award.

Comment from Morgan
Time: August 9, 2010, 4:06 am

In response to my email query a couple weeks ago, “I am wondering if this posting by Maureen Bader (http://www.taxpayer.com/blog/12-07-2010/fond-farewell-forced-census) is your organization’s position on the government’s decision to scrap the mandatory long-form census questionnaire?”, Mr. Kevin Gaudet responded: “I agree with Maureen’s position. I am the federal spokesperson.”

Write a comment





Related articles