Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Consumer Tax Index

When confronted with a document as muddled as yesterday’s Canadian Consumer Tax Index, a major challenge is figuring out where to begin in critiquing it. Indeed, this one Fraser Institute report supplied enough fodder for three separate posts today by Iglika (and she is promising a fourth!)

I think that the report’s worst flaws are overstating average taxes and ignoring the introduction of new public services during the past half-century.


The report’s starting point is that all taxes are paid by individuals. Apparently, the “tax bill of the average Canadian family” includes $2,484 of corporate income tax and $397 of charges for natural resources.

The typical argument that all taxes are ultimately paid by individuals is that all income ultimately accrues to individuals. For example, corporate income taxes come out of profits that ostensibly belong to individual shareholders.

By this logic, the appropriate comparison is between total taxes and total income (GDP). In 2009, taxes of $471 billion from GDP of $1,528 billion implied an average tax rate of 30.8%, relatively low by historical or international standards.

But the Fraser Institute compares total taxes with income accruing directly to persons and unincorporated businesses. Not surprisingly, a smaller denominator produces a larger fraction: “the total tax bill of the average Canadian family in 2009 amounted to 41.7 percent of cash income.”

The source cited for this figure (and others) is “The Fraser Institute’s Canadian Tax Simulator, 2009.” So, it is difficult for a sceptical reader to check the calculations. However, among other things, it is clear that the numerator includes corporate income tax while the denominator excludes retained corporate profits.


Taxes actually declined in 2009 because of the recession. To show a continuing increase, the Fraser Institute adds deficits (“deferred taxes”) onto the total. We should remind right-wing pundits of that methodology next time they complain about higher current taxes in Canada than in the United States.

Public Services

The Consumer Tax Index purports to be a public-sector version of the Consumer Price Index. The latter examines how the price of a given basket of goods and services increases over time. It deliberately holds quantity constant to measure price changes.

By contrast, the Consumer Tax Index makes no distinction between the price and quantity of public services. Its base year is 1961, shortly before the Canada Pension Plan and Medicare were added to Canada’s basket of public services.

The Fraser Institute claims that, as a share of “average cash income,” taxes rose from 33.5% in 1961 to 41.7% in 2009, an increase of 8.2%. Canada Pension Plan premiums, which the Fraser Institute counts as a tax, now equal 9.9% of employment income up to average industrial earnings.

The introduction of public pensions and health insurance surely explains most, if not all, of the tax increase over the past half-century.

Enjoy and share:

Write a comment

Related articles