Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Boom, Bust and Consolidation November 9, 2018
    The five largest bitumen-extractive corporations in Canada control 79.3 per cent of Canada’s productive capacity of bitumen. The Big Five—Suncor Energy, Canadian Natural Resources Limited (CNRL), Cenovus Energy, Imperial Oil and Husky Energy—collectively control 90 per cent of existing bitumen upgrading capacity and are positioned to dominate Canada’s future oil sands development. In a sense they […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • A new Director for CCPA's BC Office: Message from Mary Childs, Board Chair October 24, 2018
    The CCPA-BC Board of Directors is delighted to share the news that Shannon Daub will be the next BC Director of the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives. Last spring, Seth Klein announced that, after 22 years, he would be stepping down as founding Director of the CCPA-BC at the end of 2018. The CCPA-BC’s board […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Who Owns Canada’s Fossil-Fuel Sector? October 15, 2018
    The major investors in Canada’s fossil-fuel sector have high stakes in maintaining business as usual rather than addressing the industry’s serious climate issues, says a new Corporate Mapping Project study.  And as alarms ring over our continued dependence on natural gas, coal and oil, these investors have both an interest in the continued growth of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Pharmacare consensus principles released today September 24, 2018
    A diverse coalition representing health care providers, non-profit organizations, workers, seniors, patients and academics has come together to issue a statement of consensus principles for the establishment of National Pharmacare in Canada. Our coalition believes that National Pharmacare should be a seamless extension of the existing universal health care system in Canada, which covers medically […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice September 19, 2018
    The CCPA is pleased to announce the creation of the Kate McInturff Fellowship in Gender Justice.This Fellowship is created to honour the legacy of senior researcher Kate McInturff who passed away in July 2018. Kate was a feminist trailblazer in public policy and gender-based research and achieved national acclaim for researching, writing, and producing CCPA’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

EI: Evidence of Exhaustion?

Today’s Employment Insurance (EI) figures indicate that, in August, 23,000 more Canadians filed EI claims but 19,000 fewer received EI benefits.

The most optimistic possibility is that all of the workers who stopped receiving benefits got jobs. Indeed, the Labour Force Survey indicates that total employment rose by 27,000 in August.

However, that is not the end of the story. The labour force also expanded by 49,000 that month. Adding the 19,000 people who stopped receiving EI benefits implies that some 68,000 additional workers were chasing only 27,000 additional jobs.

One cannot conclude that all, or even most, of those who came off benefits found work. Many probably ran out of benefits but remain unemployed.

Provincial Breakdown

Statistics Canada notes particularly sharp declines in the number of beneficiaries in Ontario, Manitoba and Saskatchewan. These provinces had low official unemployment rates, and hence short benefit durations, going into the economic crisis. Since an EI claim’s duration is set when it is first established, one would expect benefit exhaustion to hit these provinces first.

Indeed, total employment dropped in Saskatchewan during August. Therefore, its decrease in EI beneficiaries most likely reflects workers exhausting their claims rather than finding jobs.

Benefit Coverage

Today’s revelation that more EI claims were filed in August than in July confirms that workers are still being laid off. Since the labour force expanded more than employment in August, unemployment increased by 22,000 that month.

The combination of more unemployment and fewer EI beneficiaries pushed the proportion of unemployed Canadians receiving benefits further below 50%. Indeed, this fraction is below 40% in Ontario, Manitoba and Alberta.

Employment Insurance Coverage, August 2009 (seasonally-adjusted figures)

 

EI Recipients 

Unemployment

Coverage 

 Canada  

763.2 

1,604.9  

 47.6 % 

 Newfoundland  

 43.6  

 39.7  

109.8 %  

 PEI  

 8.7  

 10.9 

 79.8 %  

 Nova Scotia  

 33.9  

 47.3  

 71.7 %  

 New Brunswick  

 37.1  

 37.5  

 98.9 %  

 Quebec  

208.0  

382.6  

 54.4 % 

 Ontario  

247.4  

673.5  

 36.7 %  

 Manitoba  

 14.5  

 37.2  

 39.0 %  

 Saskatchewan  

 13.0  

 27.3  

 47.6 %  

 Alberta  

 57.7  

157.7  

 36.6 %  

 BC  

 88.7  

191.3  

 46.4 %  

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from David
Time: October 27, 2009, 7:00 am

Erin, can you explain what is likely the cause of such drastic differences between provinces in the coverage rates? And how should we interpret coverage above 100%, such as in Newfoundland?

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: October 27, 2009, 8:03 am

Since the accessibility and duration of benefits depend on the regional unemployment rate, one would expect better coverage in provinces with higher unemployment rates.

However, as explained a couple of months ago, I am mystified that coverage is so low in Ontario even though the province has had a relatively high unemployment rate for some time.

Coverage above 100% reflects the fact that people can do some work while receiving EI benefits. In any given month, someone could legitimately report their employment to the Labour Force Survey while also receiving some EI.

Comment from David
Time: October 27, 2009, 3:34 pm

Thanks Erin! Interesting stuff.

Comment from John Richmond
Time: October 29, 2009, 9:11 am

What about welfare roles? In particular, Ontario…

Comment from andrew jackson
Time: November 1, 2009, 4:46 am

Ontario is a mystery to me also. Part of the reason may be a relatively high proportion of recent immigrants, since they have to jump the high new entrant requirement of 910 hours. This seems to be a big factor in the GTA

Write a comment





Related articles