Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Deflation Has Landed

Deflation is no longer a spectre, but a reality for Canada. This morning, Statistics Canada reported an inflation rate of minus 0.3%.

Inflation turning negative was widely predicted, including in my previous comments on the Consumer Price Index. Although not surprising, today’s news has important implications for the debate about further fiscal stimulus.

Statistics Canada noted that June 2009 was the first month of negative inflation since November 1994. The annual inflation rate was indeed negative for three months in 1994, but never fell below minus 0.2%.

Today’s inflation rate falls below the 1994 experience. In fact, it is the lowest Canadian inflation rate recorded since August 1955.

Despite being the most negative inflation rate in more than half a century, today’s figure does not reflect a deflationary spiral. We have not seen a generalized price decline prompting delayed consumer purchases and further production cuts. So far, inflation is negative almost entirely due to lower gasoline prices in the summer of 2009 compared to the summer of 2008.

Nevertheless, a negative inflation rate deflates the argument that central banks and governments should reign-in stimulus to avoid rising inflation. My last Consumer Price Index commentary observed that G-8 finance ministers were wildly premature in proposing “exist strategies” from stimulus programs. Thankfully, G-8 leaders have since committed to continue stimulus until it achieves a sustained economic recovery.

Negative inflation leaves room for further stimulus without much risk of fuelling excessive inflation. The Government of Canada should be formulating a second stimulus package because its first stimulus package was too small, a low debt-to-GDP ratio affords ample room to finance more stimulus, and more stimulus will be needed to create jobs even after economic growth resumes.

With a substantial trade deficit on top of ongoing corporate and household de-leveraging, Canada may be entering a period in which public investment will be the main driver of economic growth. In this sense, the focus should be not only on more short-term stimulus but also on more long-term public investment.

UPDATE (July 18): Today’s Toronto Star quotes this commentary. It and other newspapers have reported that June had the lowest inflation rate since 1955. That information was not in Statistics Canada’s release and I am inclined to claim that you read it here first. However, Statistics Canada’s historical inflation data is publicly accessible, so anyone else could have come up with this factoid independently.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: July 17, 2009, 11:00 am

And I hope Erin, adding on to your last line, we have governments responding in such a manner. Instead of cutting budgets and taking aim at public workers, we need to have a more macro response.

To date, we have started to witness public sector wage concessions, i.e. Toronto, and some provincial cuts to budgets, i.e. Campbell’s BC Government.

This will only add to the deflationary winds. I know I am a bit of a deflation hawk, but hey I am still not convinced that we have turned the corner. THe employment numbers in the US are still bleeding quite profusely- the patient still has not regained consciousness.

Oddly enough!?, it seems when the bank investors ship is right sided and bailed out, it seems like happy times. Why is it that when it were the well to do, were in fear for dramatic losses, policy makers went wild, bring forth the most extravagant finacial aid packages, we have ever witnessed. Yet when it is workers continuing to lose thousands and thousands of jobs, there is no storm any more, no panic, no huge bail out packages, no government action.

The contradictions are loud, but why does it not seem to translate to votes. I don;t get it! It was the working man’s tax dollars that saved the financial industry, hmmmmmm.

pt

Comment from David
Time: July 21, 2009, 1:04 am

My understanding is that core inflation is basically unaffected and it’s oil prices, which we all know are extremely volatile, that are driving these inflation numbers.

It seems a little premature to make any widesweeping claims about the effects of stimulus on deflation when we haven’t seen core deflation.

Comment from Purple Library Guy
Time: July 21, 2009, 9:33 pm

By the same token, as you point out there hasn’t been any impact from the stimulus on inflation either.
I dunno. I’m not sure where they get all these numbers. From what my wife tells me it sure seems like it’s easier to bargain hunt for clothes and such lately.

Write a comment





Related articles