Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Budget 2018: The Most Disappointing Budget Ever March 14, 2018
    Premier Pallister’s Trump-esque statement that budget 2018 was going to be the “best budget ever” has fallen a bit flat. Instead of a bold plan to deal with climate change, poverty and our crumbling infrastructure, we are presented with two alarmist scenarios to justify further tax cuts and a lack of decisive action: the recent […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2018 Federal Budget Analysis February 14, 2018
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis Some baby steps for dad and big steps forward for women, by Kate McInturff (CCPA) An ambition constrained budget, by David Macdonald (CCPA) Five things […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • With regional management BC’s iconic forest industry can benefit British Columbians rather than multinational corporations January 17, 2018
    Forests are one of the iconic symbols of British Columbia, and successive governments and companies operating here have largely focussed on the cheap, commodity lumber business that benefits industry. Former provincial forestry minister Bob Williams, who has been involved with the industry for five decades, proposes regional management of this valuable natural resource to benefit […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Community Economic Development in Manitoba - a new film January 16, 2018
    Cinameteque, Jan 23.  7:00 pm - Free event Film Trailer CCEDNET-MB, CCPA-MB, The Manitoba Research Alliance and Rebel Sky Media presents: The Inclusive Economy:  Stories of Community Economic Development in Manitoba
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Canada’s trade deficit in cultural services

With the Conservatives’ “Born in the USA” Copyright Act now tabled, the fur is flying. A year after leaping to the defence of the oil and gas industry, Terrance Corcoran has got Big US Media’s back (does Terry ever stand up for anyone but the wealthy and powerful?). As always, Michael Giest, who knows way more about copyright than yours truly, has assembled an excellent legal and policy analysis of the Canadian DMCA (here and here).

So I went over to Statscan to find out what our trade balance with the US looks like in this area. It is not surprising that Canada runs a rather hefty trade deficit with the US in cultural services (table 2). Overall, it is a deficit of $300 million, although in one category, film production, we enjoy a surplus due to all of the movies and TV shows shot in Canada. But in the category of interest to the DMCA, “copyrights and related services (royalties)”, we had imports of $879 million in 2005 compared to exports of only $146 million, for a trade deficit of $733 million (ie. this amount leaves Canada and goes into the coffers of Big Media).

Back in 1996, imports for this copyrights category were only $180 million and exports $54 million, for a deficit of $126 million. So the royalties flowing south have grown rapidly, as has our deficit in this sector. Which makes one wonder what all the fuss is all about. The US industry has thrived in Canada over the past decade, with profits up almost five-fold. As capitalists we should expect them to want even more, but that does not mean we should hand it over on a silver platter without anything in return.

The implication of the Canadian DMCA is that it will likely increase that trade deficit by strengthening the rights of copyright owners at the expense of users, shifting a delicate balance that has been struck over the years between private profit and public interest. And with some considerable irony, too, since the Tories are ostensibly about free trade and small government, whereas this legislation is about protecting monopoly rights of foreigners while expanding the powers of the state to invade privacy on behalf of those interests.

Enjoy and share:

Write a comment

Related articles