Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Mobility pricing must be fair and equitable for all April 12, 2018
    As Metro Vancouver’s population has grown, so have its traffic congestion problems. Whether it’s a long wait to cross a bridge or get on a bus, everyone can relate to the additional time and stress caused by a transportation system under strain. Mobility pricing is seen as a solution to Metro Vancouver’s transportation challenges with […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Budget 2018: The Most Disappointing Budget Ever March 14, 2018
    Premier Pallister’s Trump-esque statement that budget 2018 was going to be the “best budget ever” has fallen a bit flat. Instead of a bold plan to deal with climate change, poverty and our crumbling infrastructure, we are presented with two alarmist scenarios to justify further tax cuts and a lack of decisive action: the recent […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2018 Federal Budget Analysis February 14, 2018
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis Some baby steps for dad and big steps forward for women, by Kate McInturff (CCPA) An ambition constrained budget, by David Macdonald (CCPA) Five things […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • With regional management BC’s iconic forest industry can benefit British Columbians rather than multinational corporations January 17, 2018
    Forests are one of the iconic symbols of British Columbia, and successive governments and companies operating here have largely focussed on the cheap, commodity lumber business that benefits industry. Former provincial forestry minister Bob Williams, who has been involved with the industry for five decades, proposes regional management of this valuable natural resource to benefit […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Jobs Gains Skew Part-time, Over 55

The Canadian labour market added 29,000 jobs in March, beating expectations. Underneath the headline, though, the numbers aren’t as rosy.

A jump of 57,000 part-time jobs masked the loss of 28,000 full-time jobs between February and March.

Given the jumpy nature of monthly LFS data, I’ve decided to base most of my analysis on quarterly numbers. And since most of the job gains were in the 55+ age group, I thought it would be interesting to look at the FT / PT breakdown by age.

Using seasonally unadjusted data, I compared Q1 2014 with Q1 2015. We find that part time jobs dominate in the under 55 age group, and full-time jobs dominate in the over 55 age group. Since more boomers age into that category every day (and will be doing so for the next few years still) the meaning of that is questionable.

JobsQ1

 

In fact, what we see when we look at employment rates, is that they haven’t budged for any age category. So employment growth in all age groups has only just kept pace with population growth, and not made a dent in our stagnant labour market.

 

EmpQ1

Over the medium term though, we have seen an increase in the employment rate of 55+, and a decrease in the employment rate of 15-24 year olds. Using seasonally adjusted data, there has been a steady increase in the employment rate of workers over 55, with nary a blip for the recession.

On the other hand, the employment rate for young workers 15-24 fell 5 percentage points during the recession, and remains 3 percentage point lower than in Q1 2007.

Generations

 

Take away – there’s a stagnant job market for core age workers, and an awful one for young workers.

What we don’t need is more of the same economic mismanagement, focused on cuts rather than opportunities for growth. We need to build a sustainable economy for the future.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Purple Library Guy
Time: April 10, 2015, 1:15 pm

Also, if the overall job growth represents an overall loss of full-time jobs masked by a greater gain in part-time jobs, and if the total gain in jobs is barely enough to maintain exactly the same overall employment rate, presumably the rate of full-time employment is dropping significantly–especially since this is a pattern I seem to see every time someone talks about job growth.
How much has the full-time employment rate dropped over the last couple of years? How much has it dropped for young workers? It would seem they’re getting hosed doubly–they’re losing total jobs, and on top of that they’re massively losing full time jobs so that the few jobs they have left are mostly crap.

Comment from Larry Kazdan
Time: April 10, 2015, 9:26 pm

Letter in National Post
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/todays-letters-canadas-best-kept-secret

State’s responsibility

Re: Are The Tories Good ‘Economic Managers’?, Stephen Gordon, April 7.

Economics, in a democracy, must serve public purpose. That means citizens have access to income. Although Canada has a mature welfare system, most able-bodied people rely on employment to pay their bills. Public purpose requires government to assure sufficient jobs are available even when the private sector cannot provide them.

That the government has the power to create jobs is proven by the experience of the Second World War when one in three adult males was in military service and many civilians made munitions on government contract. The state’s immense wartime expenditure did not damage the economy, but on the contrary left it stronger with a well-disciplined workforce. As British politician Tony Benn exclaimed, “If you can have full employment by killing Germans, why can’t we have it by building hospitals, schools, recruiting nurses and teachers? If you can find money to kill people, you can find money to help people.”

Stephen Gordon’s view economic competence is a meaningless term is a scathing indictment of orthodox economics, with its erroneous belief a positive outcome (full employment) is beyond the scope of human agency, and must be left to market whim.

Write a comment





Related articles