Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Jobs Gains Skew Part-time, Over 55

The Canadian labour market added 29,000 jobs in March, beating expectations. Underneath the headline, though, the numbers aren’t as rosy.

A jump of 57,000 part-time jobs masked the loss of 28,000 full-time jobs between February and March.

Given the jumpy nature of monthly LFS data, I’ve decided to base most of my analysis on quarterly numbers. And since most of the job gains were in the 55+ age group, I thought it would be interesting to look at the FT / PT breakdown by age.

Using seasonally unadjusted data, I compared Q1 2014 with Q1 2015. We find that part time jobs dominate in the under 55 age group, and full-time jobs dominate in the over 55 age group. Since more boomers age into that category every day (and will be doing so for the next few years still) the meaning of that is questionable.

JobsQ1

 

In fact, what we see when we look at employment rates, is that they haven’t budged for any age category. So employment growth in all age groups has only just kept pace with population growth, and not made a dent in our stagnant labour market.

 

EmpQ1

Over the medium term though, we have seen an increase in the employment rate of 55+, and a decrease in the employment rate of 15-24 year olds. Using seasonally adjusted data, there has been a steady increase in the employment rate of workers over 55, with nary a blip for the recession.

On the other hand, the employment rate for young workers 15-24 fell 5 percentage points during the recession, and remains 3 percentage point lower than in Q1 2007.

Generations

 

Take away – there’s a stagnant job market for core age workers, and an awful one for young workers.

What we don’t need is more of the same economic mismanagement, focused on cuts rather than opportunities for growth. We need to build a sustainable economy for the future.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Purple Library Guy
Time: April 10, 2015, 1:15 pm

Also, if the overall job growth represents an overall loss of full-time jobs masked by a greater gain in part-time jobs, and if the total gain in jobs is barely enough to maintain exactly the same overall employment rate, presumably the rate of full-time employment is dropping significantly–especially since this is a pattern I seem to see every time someone talks about job growth.
How much has the full-time employment rate dropped over the last couple of years? How much has it dropped for young workers? It would seem they’re getting hosed doubly–they’re losing total jobs, and on top of that they’re massively losing full time jobs so that the few jobs they have left are mostly crap.

Comment from Larry Kazdan
Time: April 10, 2015, 9:26 pm

Letter in National Post
http://news.nationalpost.com/full-comment/todays-letters-canadas-best-kept-secret

State’s responsibility

Re: Are The Tories Good ‘Economic Managers’?, Stephen Gordon, April 7.

Economics, in a democracy, must serve public purpose. That means citizens have access to income. Although Canada has a mature welfare system, most able-bodied people rely on employment to pay their bills. Public purpose requires government to assure sufficient jobs are available even when the private sector cannot provide them.

That the government has the power to create jobs is proven by the experience of the Second World War when one in three adult males was in military service and many civilians made munitions on government contract. The state’s immense wartime expenditure did not damage the economy, but on the contrary left it stronger with a well-disciplined workforce. As British politician Tony Benn exclaimed, “If you can have full employment by killing Germans, why can’t we have it by building hospitals, schools, recruiting nurses and teachers? If you can find money to kill people, you can find money to help people.”

Stephen Gordon’s view economic competence is a meaningless term is a scathing indictment of orthodox economics, with its erroneous belief a positive outcome (full employment) is beyond the scope of human agency, and must be left to market whim.

Write a comment





Related articles