Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada July 9, 2019
    CCPA senior economist David Macdonald co-authored a new report, Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada­—released by Upstream Institute in partnership with the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)—tracks child poverty rates using Census 2006, the 2011 National Household Survey and Census 2016. The report is available for […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Fossil-Power Top 50 launched July 3, 2019
    What do Suncor, Encana, the Royal Bank of Canada, the Fraser Institute and 46 other companies and organizations have in common? They are among the entities that make up the most influential fossil fuel industry players in Canada. Today, the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP) is drawing attention to these powerful corporations and organizations with the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Tickets available for Errol Black Chair Fundraising Brunch 2019 June 26, 2019
    You are invited to CCPA-MB’s annual fundraising brunch in support of the Errol Black Chair in Labour Issues.  Please join us to honour: Honoured Guest: John Loxley is Professor of Economics at the University of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Guest Speaker:  Jim Stanford is Economist and Director of the Centre […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The fight against ISDS in Romania June 24, 2019
    CCPA is proud to co-sponsor this terrific video from our colleagues at Corporate Europe Observatory. It chronicles grassroots resistance to efforts by Canadian mining company Gabriel Resources to build Europe’s largest open-pit gold mine in a culturally rich and environmentally sensitive region of Romania. After this unimaginably destructive project was refused by the Romanian public and courts, the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Will Oil & Potash Put SK Back in Black?

The Sask. Party government pulled out all the stops yesterday to report an ostensibly balanced budget, quite possibly the last one before next spring’s provincial election.

Revenue Assumptions

The drop in oil prices is a huge fiscal blow to Saskatchewan, and one of the ways the government projects continued balanced budgets is by assuming a rebound in oil prices. Perhaps more significantly, it assumes no corresponding rebound in the Canada-US exchange rate this coming fiscal year:

WTI Oil E-Rate
Today $43.88 78.58
2015-16 $57.15 79.16
2016-17 $69.50 81.38
2017-18 $79.00 82.88
2018-19 $85.75 84.25

Source: Provincial Budget, page 50.

Historically, there has been a very close correlation between oil prices and the exchange rate. Yet the Saskatchewan government is assuming that, by 2018-19, the price of oil will recover three-quarters of the way to $100 per barrel while the exchange rate will recover only about one-quarter of the way to parity.

The budget notes (on page 47) that every US$1 increase in the price of oil boosts provincial royalty revenue by $23 million. However, every one-cent increase in the exchange rate reduces provincial royalty revenue by $38 million.

The exchange rate is so important to provincial finances because commodity prices are denominated in US dollars. A higher exchange rate lowers the Canadian-dollar value not only of oil revenue, but also of potash and uranium revenues.

The Saskatchewan government projects the fiscal benefits of rising commodity prices without the fiscal costs of a rising exchange rate.

Revenue Policies

Beyond optimistic assumptions, yesterday’s budget included some policy changes to collect more revenue. In particular, with oil down, the provincial government looked to potash companies for additional revenue.

Some of us thought that our province should have been collecting a better return from potash even when oil prices were high. In 2012, I proposed closing four specific loopholes in the Potash Production Tax:

  • The ongoing holiday for sales in excess of the 2001 and 2002 average.
  • The deduction of Crown royalties against the Production Tax.
  • The Saskatchewan Resource Credit.
  • The 120% writeoff of investment in calculating the Production Tax.

Budget 2013 reduced the Saskatchewan Resource Credit from 1% to 0.75% of sales. I would have eliminated it altogether, but reducing it was certainly a step in the right direction.

Yesterday’s budget begins to address the 120% writeoff. On the one hand, it extends the writeoff from investment in excess of 2002 levels to all investment. On the other hand, it stops companies from deducting the whole 120% right away and makes them spread it out over a few years.

Largely as a result of this policy change, potash revenues are projected to jump by $233 million between the current fiscal year and the upcoming one (page 78). PotashCorp, which comprises about half of the industry, complains that the change will reduce its 2015 profit by $100 million.

In one sense, the government is just borrowing against future potash revenues – collecting more money now by pushing a slightly larger writeoff out into the future. To quote the budget (page 56), “This change will provide the Province with an immediate temporary increase in revenue from the potash industry by deferring deductions for current capital spending to future years.”

But this move calls attention to the magnitude of the writeoff and the potential to collect more revenue from potash. The budget also promises a broader review of the Potash Production Tax. I say, “Bring it on!”

Write a comment





Related articles