Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Unpacking the details of Manitoba Hydro September 9, 2019
    What would a long view of Manitoba Hydro all entail.  Read report here.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA submission to Treasury Board consultation on regulatory modernization September 6, 2019
    On June 29, 2019, the federal government launched a public consultation on initiatives intended to "modernize" the Canadian regulatory system. Interested Canadians were invited to provide input on four current initiatives: Targeted Regulatory Reviews (Round 2) Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act Exploring options to legislate changes to regulator mandates Suggestions for the next […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Join us in November for the 2019 CCPA-BC Gala, featuring Nancy MacLean September 3, 2019
    Tickets are available for our 2019 Annual Gala Fundraiser, which will take place in Vancouver on November 21. This year’s featured speaker will be Nancy MacLean, an award-winning historian and author whose talk, The rise of the radical right: How libertarian intellectuals, billionaires and white supremacists shaped today’s politics, is very timely both in the US and here in […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Report looks at captured nature of BC’s Oil and Gas Commission August 6, 2019
    From an early stage, BC’s Oil and Gas Commission bore the hallmarks of a captured regulator. The very industry that the Commission was formed to regulate had a significant hand in its creation and, too often, the interests of the industry it regulates take precedence over the public interest. This report looks at the evolution […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Correcting the Record July 26, 2019
    Earlier this week Kris Sims and Franco Terrazzano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation wrote an opinion piece that was published in the Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, Winnipeg Sun, Ottawa Sun and Toronto Sun. The opinion piece makes several false claims and connections regarding the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), which we would like to correct. The […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Agreeing with Hoback’s Headline

I have the following letter in today’s Prince Albert Daily Herald (page 4):

Reinvest Resource Wealth in Saskatchewan

To the editor: I strongly agree with the title of MP Randy Hoback’s letter: “Siphoning money out of the west is wrong” (June 9). My proposal is to keep more money in Saskatchewan by collecting more provincial royalty revenue from the extraction of non-renewable resources. These additional funds could be invested in needed infrastructure (like a new bridge across the North Saskatchewan River) and used to establish a provincial savings fund for future generations.

Provincial resource royalties are deductible in calculating federal corporate taxes. Therefore, increasing royalties would shift some revenue from Ottawa to the Saskatchewan government — the opposite of what Pierre Trudeau attempted. Mr. Hoback invokes Mr. Trudeau’s spectre to avoid actually addressing my provincial policy proposal or NDP Leader Tom Mulcair’s federal proposals.

Premier Brad Wall is siphoning money out of Saskatchewan by keeping royalties at rock bottom despite high commodity prices. The Canadian Association of Petroleum Producers reports that Saskatchewan received only $1.8 billion of royalties from $10.3 billion of oil sales in 2010. By comparison, Newfoundland and Labrador collected $2.2 billion of royalties from $8.3 billion of offshore oil sales.

The corporate profits from this giveaway of Saskatchewan resources accrue overwhelmingly to shareholders outside the province. Taxes on these profits flow more to Ottawa than to the province. In 2010, the Potash Corporation of Saskatchewan paid less corporate tax to Saskatchewan than to Trinidad.

Giving away provincial commodities attracts foreign investors to take over local resource companies. To buy equity in Canadian corporations, they must first buy Canadian dollars. This demand for loonies bids up the exchange rate, making our exports less competitive in foreign markets.

An overvalued Canadian dollar hurts Saskatchewan. The province has lost 5,200 manufacturing jobs since Premier Wall took office.

Because commodities are priced in American dollars, the higher exchange rate further reduces Saskatchewan resource revenues in Canadian dollars. The provincial budget estimates that each U.S. cent of appreciation in the loonie reduces non-renewable resource revenue by $34 million.

On manufacturing, Mr. Hoback blames the former NDP government for the closure of Prince Albert’s pulp mill. In fact, New Democrats had signed an agreement with Domtar to reopen it. The Wall government tore up that agreement, costing Prince Albert hundreds of jobs.

The mill, which processed renewable resources, went out of business largely because the giveaway of non-renewable resources pushed the exchange rate too high. The MP for Prince Albert should be concerned about an overvalued currency damaging local manufacturing.

In cheerleading for resource companies, Mr. Hoback claims, “The natural resource sectors directly employ more than three-quarters of a million Canadians.” Statistics Canada’s Labour Force Survey reports that only half that many people — 378,900 as of May — work in “natural resources” including “forestry, fishing, mining, quarrying, oil and gas.”

Through better management of resource royalties and the exchange rate, we can maintain jobs in resource industries, collect more provincial revenue and facilitate manufacturing employment. My offer to debate these issues with Mr. Hoback stands, although his letter indicated that he is unwilling to explain and defend his positions in a public forum in Prince Albert.

Erin Weir, Economist, United Steelworkers, Regina

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: June 21, 2012, 7:32 pm

Bring on the debate, this guy loves taking shots at you instead of taking the gloves off and having a discussion.

The question is why- why do we never see a tory actually sit down and debate anybody- why are t hey ordered not to talk to anybody in a public forum.

And to think they have the nerve to accuse people of being communists! At least even the communists had to hold public discussions- Harper and crew are afraid of their own shadows- why, because they are to busy sending each other name calling and sending emails calling each other “assholes”.

Come on Randy be a mensch and get off the soap box and have a discussion with Erin- I am sure the CBC would accommodate it- Trust me Erin has had all his shots and does not bite, his hair is mighty dangerous, but really he is a nice guy!

Comment from Elaine Hughes
Time: June 25, 2012, 7:27 am

Harper’s mantra: governance by bullying! We see it on everything he touches!!

Plus, why would we EVER expect democratic discourse in a dictatorship, anyhow?!

Write a comment





Related articles