Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • How to make NAFTA sustainable, equitable July 19, 2017
    Global Affairs Canada is consulting Canadians on their priorities for, and concerns about, the planned renegotiation of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). In CCPA’s submission to this process, Scott Sinclair, Stuart Trew and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood point out how NAFTA has failed to live up to its promise with respect to job and productivity […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • What’s next for BC? July 4, 2017
    Five weeks ago the CCPA-BC began a letter to our supporters with this statement: “What an interesting and exciting moment in BC politics! For a bunch of policy nerds like us at the CCPA, it doesn’t get much better than this.” At the time, we were writing about the just-announced agreement between the BC NDP […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Could skyrocketing private sector debt spell economic crisis? June 21, 2017
    Our latest report finds that Canada is racking up private sector debt faster than any other advanced economy in the world, putting the country at risk of serious economic consequences. The report, Addicted to Debt, reveals that Canada has added $1 trillion in private sector debt over the past five years, with the corporate sector […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The energy industry’s insatiable thirst for water threatens First Nations’ treaty-protected rights June 21, 2017
    Our latest report looks at the growing concerns that First Nations in British Columbia have with the fossil fuel industry’s increasing need for large volumes of water for natural gas fracking operations. Titled Fracking, First Nations and Water: Respecting Indigenous rights and better protecting our shared resources, it describes what steps should be taken to […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Betting on Bitumen: Alberta's energy policies from Lougheed to Klein June 8, 2017
    The role of government in Alberta, both involvement and funding, has been critical in ensuring that more than narrow corporate interests were served in the development of the province’s bitumen resources.  A new report contrasts the approaches taken by two former premiers during the industry’s early development and rapid expansion periods.  The Lougheed government invested […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Libertarians for an Inheritance Tax

I rarely give thanks for Neil Reynolds, but today’s column is a must-read. The point is that taxing large inheritances should appeal not only to those of us concerned about highly unequal outcomes, but also to those simply concerned about equality of opportunity.

It may or may not be possible to justify inequalities based on differences in effort, skill, intelligence, etc. However, there is no justification for huge inequalities based on heredity alone.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from rcp
Time: October 10, 2011, 3:26 pm

Except, of course, that Canada already has an inheritance tax – the “deemed disposition on death” for capital gains tax, as Neil Reynolds mentioned (kind of unclearly) halfway through his article.

The U.S. has no deemed disposition on death (in fact, the basis for capital gains calculation “steps up” to the then-current market value on death), so an estate tax makes sense for them.

In Canada, if we were going to reintroduce estate taxes, we should to be consistent remove the “deemed disposition on death” first. In fact, Canada’s current system is superior, since an estate tax inescapably requires a gift tax as well, to avoid deathbed gifts – administering everything through the income tax system is much more efficient.

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: October 10, 2011, 8:28 pm

Capital-gains tax applies to only half the value of unrealized capital gains in an estate rather than to the full value of a bequest. Deemed disposition is not a substitute for inheritance tax, but a deferral of regular income tax on previously accrued capital gains.

Comment from Toby Sanger
Time: October 10, 2011, 8:29 pm

Yes, rcp, thanks for making that point. Neil Reynolds would have done well to read the 2011 Alternative Federal Budget where on page 26 it proposes introducing an inheritance tax, but says this would be to tax what doesn’t get captured by capital gains taxes, which should be at a higher rate than US-style inheritance taxes.

It was of course a surprise to see this from Neil Reynolds, but he is (once again) wrong about the amount of revenue that would be raised from such a tax and skims over inconvenient facts.

Comment from rcp
Time: October 11, 2011, 4:16 am

@ Erin:

I disagree. Prior to 1972 Canada had no capital gains tax, but did have estate taxes.

When the capital gains tax was introduced, it had a couple of features differing from other countries’ versions of the tax:

1) Deemed disposition on death

2) Deemed disposition every 21 years for assets held by most trusts.

At the same time that capital gains tax was introduced, estate taxes were abolished. So as a matter of history, and of tax policy, “deemed disposition on death” was definitely introduced as an inheritance tax, a substitute for the previous estate tax.

Comment from Purple Library Guy
Time: October 11, 2011, 2:15 pm

I’m not clear why the history of it is all that relevant. So once, for presumably terrible reasons, we had no capital gains tax. Well, good thing we changed that, although not nearly enough as capital gains are taxed much less than income from doing useful things. And, so, at the same time we brought in a capital gains tax, we got rid of the inheritance tax–evidently the wealthy still had enough control, even near the height of the welfare state ideology in 1972, to successfully push for such a trade-off. Well, that’s a pity, but I don’t see why it means we shouldn’t have one now.

Taxing dead people is a great idea, no matter what we did in 1972. I guess that’s selfish of me–as a living person, they aren’t really my constituency. Tell you what–hands up all the dead people who don’t want to be taxed. Nobody? Right then.

Write a comment





Related articles