Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Hurricane Trichet Hits Jackson Hole

After watching Jack Layton’s state funeral, I noticed that Jean-Claude Trichet’s speech from Jackson Hole is online. The European Central Bank president does not seem to get it. Far from acknowledging that last month’s interest-rate hike was premature, he touts “price stability.”

His main theme is that the economic divergence between Eurozone countries is comparable to that between American states. From there, he jumps to the non sequitur that what both Europe and the US need is more “structural reform,” specifically deregulation of labour and service markets.

What he misses (or deliberately overlooks) is that the US is a fiscal union, in which transfers help to support hard-hit regions. The lion’s share of public borrowing is done by the central government at low interest rates underpinned by a sovereign currency (regardless of missives from S&P).

The Eurozone’s problem is being a monetary union without any semblance of a fiscal union. Member economies cannot adjust through different monetary policies or fiscal transfers. National governments must borrow at their own interest rates, which reflect a lack of currency sovereignty.

The solution to the Eurozone crisis is for European institutions such as the central bank, which has sovereignty over the Euro, to stand behind the (Euro-denominated) public debts of member states. However, Trichet wants to diagnose the problem as being “over-regulated” labour markets.

Enjoy and share:


Comment from Andrew jackson
Time: September 3, 2011, 3:09 pm

I agree, but it would be a big leap for some euro entity to guarantee all euro area debt given that the federal government in neither the US nor Canada guarantee provincial or state debt. And how much central control of subsidiary government finances would there have to be to make a debt guarantee viable?

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: September 4, 2011, 3:20 am

I am not sure that the Canadian situation is so clear-cut. Provincial bond spreads may reflect some slight default risk (but also reduced liquidity). However, when Alberta actually defaulted on its debt in 1936, the federal government stepped in.

At least one empirical study finds spillovers from federal debt to provincial bond rates consistent with lenders perceiving Ottawa as an implicit guarantor of provincial debt.

I am not aware of the US government explicitly or implicitly guaranteeing sub-national debt. However, this point is moot since Washington does the overwhelming majority of American public-sector borrowing on its own account.

So, Europe needs either some kind of central debt guarantee or a massive fiscal centralization, with Brussels collecting most European taxes and holding most European public debt. A guarantee would be the smaller leap, entailing much less loss of national sovereignty.

Also, a European Central Bank guarantee of Eurozone debt (possibly in the form of Eurobonds) would require consent from the 17 Eurozone member states. A broader fiscal centralization would require consent from all 27 European Union members.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: September 6, 2011, 8:00 pm

Yes Erin, but,

The present is a testimony to the degree to which Europe has not managed to overcome its barbaric nationalism. The French, Germans, and English are as far away from solidarity as they were in in 1914. Clearly Spain and Italy are much humbled as then as now. They just changed the nature of the chess board but not the game.

Comment from Paul Tulloch
Time: September 6, 2011, 8:40 pm

This is a preety good add on to your discussion Erin. I agree very much with Travis, there is a whole lot of politics seemingly scuttling any real action big enoigh to stop the blood flow. Band aids are all that have been used to this point, and potenially as this article suggests, that is as much as we can expect. Nationalism still has its stench in europe.

Write a comment

Related articles