Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Tuition Increases by Stealth

On Tuesday night, Peterborough City Council approved a plan for a for-profit corporation to own and operate a new student residence at Trent University.  I’m concerned that this may signal a new trend at Canadian universities; about a year ago, I blogged about a similar plan at the University of Toronto.

I am not opposed to private sector actors being hired to build student housing (or any other kind of housing, for that matter).  Indeed, even when social housing is built, roughly 95 percent of the capital costs go to the private sector to pay engineers, land surveyors, lawyers, labourers and others.  But as I argue in a 2007 policy paper, over the long term, rent increases significantly more when housing is owned and operated by a private entity as opposed to a not-for-profit entity.  This in turn results in increases in rent for other tenants living in the same geographical area.

Thus, when a private entity owns and operates student housing, the cost of rent at some point (especially 10 or 20 years down the road) could easily be $100 more per month than if a not-for-profit entity owned and operated the housing.  For a student living in the housing for a full year, this amounts, in effect, to a $1,200/year tuition increase.  What’s more, these rent increases create upward pressure on rent for tenants throughout the jurisdiction (probably less pressure in municipalities where students make up a small proportion of tenants, and more pressure in municipalities where students make up a larger proportion of tenants…such as in a “university town”).

When senior levels of government and universities allow for-profit entities to own and operate student housing, I believe they do two things.  First, they increase the cost of living for students living in said housing.  Second (and less directly), they increase the cost of living for other students (and other tenants) living near that housing.

I think senior levels of government should work with universities to ensure that for-profit corporations never own and operate student housing.  They should also ensure that student housing owned and operated by universities operates on a revenue-neutral basis (i.e. universities should not use the student housing as a source of revenue to fund other activities).

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: August 4, 2011, 7:45 am

“Second (and less directly), they increase the cost of living for other students living near that housing.”

That is a feature not a bug. University administrations are increasingly in bed with the local land-developers sometimes they serve directly on the BOG.

Comment from Phil Robinson
Time: August 4, 2011, 9:56 am

Well put Nick. Currently many (if not most) universities are using student housing as a revenue generating activity and are hence behaving like private for-profit corporations.

Comment from Donald Hughes
Time: August 4, 2011, 7:33 pm

If you argue that non-profit housing can deliver the same housing for much cheaper, why even have a dominant private sector in housing at all? As in, couldn’t the rental market be largely converted to non-profit housing over time, making this particular issue of secondary consequence?

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: August 4, 2011, 8:05 pm

“If you argue that non-profit housing can deliver the same housing for much cheaper, why even have a dominant private sector in housing at all? As in, couldn’t the rental market be largely converted to non-profit housing over time, making this particular issue of secondary consequence?”

Good point!

Comment from boris
Time: August 4, 2011, 9:19 pm

The U of Alberta last year built some brand new townhouse style student residences, a portion of which are grad residences. They charged ~$900/month for a bachelor in the grad buildings. When I checked in the mid-year, they still had vacancies, I suspect because that cost is simply unaffordable to most graduate students, even those that are funded. If rents in that private student housing are too high, they might actually find themselves with an excess of vacancies because students will avoid it, especially when there’s cheaper places to be had in the city.

Write a comment





Related articles