Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Why is BC’s business sector so small?

Despite all the arguments outlined on this blog, and the federal election debates, the race to the bottom in corporate taxation seems to be alive and well in the G-7. The latest move comes from the UK, whose March budget announced a new 2 percentage point reduction in their corporate tax rate.

Meanwhile, Canadian provinces have their own corporate tax race to the bottom, with BC Finance Minister Kevin Falcon proudly pointing to the fact that BC now has the lowest provincial corporate tax rate in Canada whatever chance he gets (most recently, while speaking to reporters about the federal budget).

If BC’s tax regime is so competitive, then why does BC account for only 7% of the total corporate taxable income in Canada? In comparison, Ontario, Quebec and Alberta are reported to account for 80 per cent of the corporate taxable income in the country. These statistics are attributed to Prof. Jack Mintz in this Globe and Mail article though I’m sure that Statistics Canada data is available to back them up.

BC is home to 13% of Canada’s population, and about 13% of Canada’s GDP. Why do we only have 7% of the total corporate taxable income?

Jack Mintz’ explanation: “B.C. has a relatively small business sector,” he said. “They got a lot of retired people instead.”

What a slap in the face for our current BC Liberal provincial government after a decade of cutting taxes that were supposed to make the investment environment in BC more competitive.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: April 10, 2011, 2:16 pm

It might be worth asking Mintz where he got that percentage. Statistics Canada indicates that BC had $18.3 billion out of $146.9 billion in pre-tax corporate profits for 2009 and $23.2 billion out of $217.0 billion for 2008. That’s 12.5% and 10.7%.

Of course, those figures are not the same as the Canada Revenue Agency’s definition of corporate taxable income. However, I do not immediately see a provincial breakdown of its figures.

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: April 11, 2011, 12:44 pm

As we await clarification on the data, allow me to offer some loose speculation on BC’s unspectacular corporate profits. A significant chunk of Canadian corporate profits are from resource extraction and banking.

BC has the wrong natural resources: lumber and natural-gas prices have been relatively low in recent years. (Oil and potash are where it’s at, says the guy from Saskatchewan.)

Vancouver is not in the same league as Toronto and Calgary for corporate headquarters. It is not a predominant financial centre.

The tax-cutters suggest that corporations would report more profits in BC to take advantage of its low corporate tax rate. However, the Canada Revenue Agency allocates taxable corporate profits among provinces based on actual sales and payrolls.

Therefore, corporations have little ability to shift reported profits between provinces (except by relocating real business activity, which is unlikely to be worthwhile for a few points of corporate income tax).

Comment from Andrew Jackson
Time: April 11, 2011, 1:16 pm

Perhaps if grow-ops were added to the tax base a different picture would emerge, and I am at least semi serious. I suspect the underground economy is a lot larger than average in BC.

Write a comment





Related articles