Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Unpacking the details of Manitoba Hydro September 9, 2019
    What would a long view of Manitoba Hydro all entail.  Read report here.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA submission to Treasury Board consultation on regulatory modernization September 6, 2019
    On June 29, 2019, the federal government launched a public consultation on initiatives intended to "modernize" the Canadian regulatory system. Interested Canadians were invited to provide input on four current initiatives: Targeted Regulatory Reviews (Round 2) Review of the Red Tape Reduction Act Exploring options to legislate changes to regulator mandates Suggestions for the next […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Join us in November for the 2019 CCPA-BC Gala, featuring Nancy MacLean September 3, 2019
    Tickets are available for our 2019 Annual Gala Fundraiser, which will take place in Vancouver on November 21. This year’s featured speaker will be Nancy MacLean, an award-winning historian and author whose talk, The rise of the radical right: How libertarian intellectuals, billionaires and white supremacists shaped today’s politics, is very timely both in the US and here in […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Report looks at captured nature of BC’s Oil and Gas Commission August 6, 2019
    From an early stage, BC’s Oil and Gas Commission bore the hallmarks of a captured regulator. The very industry that the Commission was formed to regulate had a significant hand in its creation and, too often, the interests of the industry it regulates take precedence over the public interest. This report looks at the evolution […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Correcting the Record July 26, 2019
    Earlier this week Kris Sims and Franco Terrazzano of the Canadian Taxpayers Federation wrote an opinion piece that was published in the Calgary Sun, Edmonton Sun, Winnipeg Sun, Ottawa Sun and Toronto Sun. The opinion piece makes several false claims and connections regarding the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP), which we would like to correct. The […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The Gender Wage Gap Revisited

Statscan have released their regular (about every 5 years) statistical compilation, Women in Canada. In a box in the earnings section – around Table 20- one will find a short summary of a paper by Michael Baker and Statscan employee  Marie Drolet from the December, 2010 issue of Canadian Public Policy.

Entitled “The Gender Wage Gap Revisited” it states that:

“When comparing earnings of women and men, the data show that men earn more than women. For example, the ratio of female–to–male annual earnings for full-year full-time workers has been relatively steady at around 0.72 since 1992. However, examining the female–to–male earnings ratio as a means to examine the existence and size of a gender pay gap may not be appropriate—particularly because among men and women working full-time, weekly work hours differ: according to the Labour Force Survey, men employed full-time usually worked 3.7 hours longer than full-time women in 2007.

Gender differences in pay may be more appropriately measured using hourly wages. Comparing the average hourly wages of women and men, the ratio was 83.3% in 2008 – up from 75.7% in 1988.”

In short, the gender gap is smaller and also less static when measured in terms of  hourly wages rather than the annual earnings of full-time workers.

The impression is left that  gender discrimination is less prevalent than we had thought.

However, the journal piece goes on to note that, when characteristics such as education are controlled for, younger women should actually be earning more per hour than men, and that 100% of the gender hourly wage gap is unexplained by observable worker characteristics. In short, the gap is still large, and  plausibly explained by employer discrimination.

The article does not address the issue of why women in full-time jobs work fewer hours than comparable men. It could be argued that this is the result of a choice. However, it could also be argued, as I would, that the choice is constrained by the gendered division of household work, and by under-provision of services needed to support working women, notably accessible, affordable child care and elder care services.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: February 8, 2011, 3:31 pm

Interestingly, the box shows a wage ratio of 90% for the youngest group.

In partial defence of StatCan, the section on part-time work gets into the issue of choice versus family responsibilities.

Comment from GC
Time: February 11, 2011, 4:13 pm

Occupational segregation – the split between higher-paying, male-dominated jobs, and lower-paying, female-dominated jobs – explains a big part of the gap. (And further, the split within occupational categories, between higher-paid “male” sub-categories and lower-paid “female” subcategories). Again there is the question of “choice” (women “choose” to be elementary- rather than secondary-school teachers) but this is strongly conditioned by various social forces.

For more on this, see pp. 106-107 in “Work and Labour in Canada: Critical Issues,” 2009, by, er, Andrew Jackson.

Comment from Andreas Moser
Time: February 19, 2011, 3:47 am

Here is the REAL reason why women earn less than men: http://andreasmoser.wordpress.com/2011/02/19/gender-pay-gap/ They have different expectations in life, and the female preference for rich men forces men to earn more.

Write a comment





Related articles