Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Mobility pricing must be fair and equitable for all April 12, 2018
    As Metro Vancouver’s population has grown, so have its traffic congestion problems. Whether it’s a long wait to cross a bridge or get on a bus, everyone can relate to the additional time and stress caused by a transportation system under strain. Mobility pricing is seen as a solution to Metro Vancouver’s transportation challenges with […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Budget 2018: The Most Disappointing Budget Ever March 14, 2018
    Premier Pallister’s Trump-esque statement that budget 2018 was going to be the “best budget ever” has fallen a bit flat. Instead of a bold plan to deal with climate change, poverty and our crumbling infrastructure, we are presented with two alarmist scenarios to justify further tax cuts and a lack of decisive action: the recent […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2018 Federal Budget Analysis February 14, 2018
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis Some baby steps for dad and big steps forward for women, by Kate McInturff (CCPA) An ambition constrained budget, by David Macdonald (CCPA) Five things […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • With regional management BC’s iconic forest industry can benefit British Columbians rather than multinational corporations January 17, 2018
    Forests are one of the iconic symbols of British Columbia, and successive governments and companies operating here have largely focussed on the cheap, commodity lumber business that benefits industry. Former provincial forestry minister Bob Williams, who has been involved with the industry for five decades, proposes regional management of this valuable natural resource to benefit […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The Sell-Off of Corporate Canada

The announcement this week that Prime Minister Stephen Harper is not going to intervene in the sale of Potash Corp. of Saskatchewan to the Australian conglomerate, BHP Billiton Ltd., speaks volumes about how Bay Street  and its servants in Ottawa are so willing and eager to sell off Canada’s corporate assets to foreign corporations.

It’s a phenomenon that has been growing for years now. And yet, depressingly, no one seems to care that much about it. One by one, jewels of the Canadian corporate community have been bartered away, and it goes pretty much unremarked. Neither the Liberals or NDP have seen fit to make an issue of the matter – which is in marked contrast to the 1970s when who controlled the Canadian economy triggered a national outcry and led to the creation of the Foreign Investment Review Agency (FIRA).

The selloff list is long and startling: last year, Nortel’s bankrupt assets were sold away to primarily Scandinavian corporate interests, despite the fact Research In Motion (RIM) tried to buy them. Again, the Harper regime refused to intervene in the purchase of Nortel’s high-tech legacy to foreign corporations.

As I mentioned here two weeks ago, the entire steel industry – Stelco, Dofasco, Algoma, IPSCO – was sold off between 2005 and 2007 to foreign conglomerates. Other notable sell offs include Alcan, Inco, a huge chunk of BCE, Four Seasons Hotels, Falconbridge, Vincor International, Hudson’s Bay Co., ATI Technologies, Intrawest, Western Oil Sands, Labatt, MacMillan Bloedel, JDS Fitel, Seagram’s, Eaton’s, Corel, CP Ships Ltd., Molson’s, Canadian Pacific hotels, and Noranda. Even Tim Hortons and hockey equipment maker Bauer are no longer Canadian-owned.

All told, 54% of 250 of Canada’s largest corporations are foreign-owned. Foreign-controlled corporations operating revenues in Canada averaged $96-million, compared with less than $2-million for their Canadian-controlled counterparts. In 2007, foreign corporations accounted for 21.1% of assets held in Canada and 30.5% of operating revenues.

Not everyone in the Canadian business establishment has watched this trend without trepidation. In 2007 and 2009, Thomas Caldwell, chairman of Caldwell Securities Ltd., a Bay Street investment house, took out full-page ads in both the Globe and Mail and National Post decrying the selling off of so many Canadian corporations to foreign interests. In one ad, entitled “The Sellout of Corporate Canada”, Caldwell remarked: “The loss of head offices and industrial leadership by Canada is one of the great corporate tragedies of our time. Future generations of Canadians, wishing to climb the corporate ladder, will increasingly be compelled to go elsewhere. The current trend guarantees Canada’s losing some of its best and brightest people.” Caldwell placed much of the blame on managers and board of directors eager to sell because they earn huge bonuses and stock options if they do so. “Years of mediocre corporate management can result in great paydays for managers as other companies, often foreign, benefit from the bargains handed to them,” he wrote.

The consequences of foreign ownership are also being clearly witnessed. US Steel has done everything it could to shutter its Stelco mills since it bought the steel company in 2007. A year later, production that was being done in Hamilton was shifted to US Steel’s American factories. In 2006, a Brazilian transnational, Vale SA, bought the Sudbury-based nickel mining company Inco. In 2009, after demanding heavy concessions, Inco workers went on what would turn out to be a bitter year-long strike. Vale fired nine striking workers and used a union-busting firm, AFI, to intimidate and harass the workers. When they finally returned to work this summer, the union had pretty much caved in and accepted the concessions.

One would hope that the Left and NDP would take up the issue of the Canadian corporate sell off in the coming months, especially as we head towards another federal election. But I wouldn’t count on it.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Erin Weir
Time: October 24, 2010, 1:35 am

A few quibbles:

– Harper described Potash Corp as already being “an American-controlled company,” perhaps implying that he will not intervene. However, the government has not made an announcement on the subject.

– Tim Hortons has reorganized itself back to being a Canadian corporation.

– The federal NDP has taken up this issue. Jack Layton wrote his doctoral thesis on foreign investment and, as party leader, has vigorously questioned the major takeovers identified above.

Comment from Travis Fast
Time: October 24, 2010, 8:37 pm

If Wall wants to kill the deal he only has to announce a new royalty regime. As per our last conversation.

Comment from Kelsey Kirkland
Time: October 24, 2010, 11:43 pm

This is what happens when Governments and Corporations are run by Paytriots!

Comment from brad
Time: November 3, 2010, 12:07 pm

this post is completely one-sided without looking at the flip reality of Canadian firms gobbling up foreign firms. we need to be cautious with this kind of nationalist analysis, which ignores the capitalist class strategy of global neoliberalism, which accepts inward investments in exchange for outward ones.

Comment from ECON
Time: November 22, 2010, 1:32 pm

Statscan data sets can give the annual $ that these foreign owned companies repatriate their profits (and management fees, royalties and etc) back to their country of origin. In 1965 to 1982 time frame my grad work showed that the investment in Canada was less than the $ leaving Canada. Drinking Canada Dry!!

Comment from Shawn Dalton
Time: October 29, 2012, 10:51 am

please copy ==> Shawn Dalton on the Sellout of Corporate Canada (2012-10o-09)

Length ==> 27:17

into ==> youtube . com

Write a comment





Related articles