Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Neoclassical economics fighting back from “the Ropes”?

In 2003 the the heterodox economics faculty at Notre Dame University were removed from the Economics Department. Now I gather their new home, The Department of Economics and Policy Studies, will be eliminated as well.  The story can be found in The Chronicle of Higher Education

An interesting analysis appeared today in the Chronicle titled ” Neoclassical Economists on the Ropes (Except at Notre Dame)

September 22, 2009, 01:48 PM ET
Neoclassical Economists on the Ropes (Except at Notre Dame)
By Teresa Ghilarducci
That squeaking sound you hear on your college campus is coming from economists nervously shifting in their chairs.

As the recession wallops jobs, eagle eyes and sharp tongues are pointing to economists asking where they were when the economy collapsed. (After all we would haul up the Center for Disease Control after an outbreak of TB.)

A serious European paper, “The Systematic Failure of Academic Economists” came out at the beginning of the year; The Nation started a good discussion in May; and preeminent economist Paul Samuelson indicted neoclassical economics by summer. The business press chimed in: Mainstream Financial Times rudely asked (rude if you are an economist):  “What is the point of economists?”

Just two weeks ago, Nobel prize winner Paul Krugman, prominently criticized our profession arguing that mathematical models and abstract formulations got the better of the neoclassical economists who should have, but didn’t, warn the world of very risky unregulated leverage. Why? perhaps 1) they just didn’t pay attention, 2) they didn’t know enough, 3) they were compromised by consulting deals by a financial industry that wanted praises, not rebukes.

What is the solution? Economists need to be broader, more self-critical, deeply knowledgeable about economic institutions. This is why it’s dumbfounding that the University of Notre Dame created an economics department filled — by intent! — of only neoclassical economists and banned their Ph.D. economists who are policy-oriented and non-orthodox from the department.

I since left — happily, to head to the New School for Social Research — but I started my career on the Notre Dame faculty attracted by it’s mission to address problems facing humanity and thrived where neoclassical economists interacted with historians, policy economists, Keynesians, Marxists, philosophers, and other faculty deeply committed to the same goal.

Notre Dame students, faculty, and scholars everywhere question ND’s move. Orthodoxy and intolerance in the economics profession helped plunge the world into the deepest recession since the 1930s: It doesn’t take a rocket scientist — or even an economist — to recognize narrowness has a cost.

Here is a modest recommendation for this aspiring top-tier university: Put all the economists it hired for the economics department in an economics department and let ideas interact. After all that is what universities do and what economic thinking and economic regulation needs.

Enjoy and share:


Comment from travis fast
Time: September 23, 2009, 12:25 pm

Can you imagine a poor NC doctoral student having to confront Phil Mirowski’s pointed questions and wit. How would they proceed to play their role in creating the TOE (theory of everything) after that?

Scientific liberalism is in decline if all they can do is wall themselves off in talk shops and group think salons.

But you have to admire the tenacity of Stalinists, who after hearing of the fall of the wall, continued on BAU. In this regard scientific socialism and liberalism are close cousins.

Comment from Kirbycairo
Time: September 23, 2009, 12:35 pm

Just as sociology departments have begun to reflect the system by becoming dominated by (so-called) criminology, Economics has become largely just a reflection of Capitalist ideology. At least that is how appears to a non-economist like me who is watching from outside.

Comment from thwap
Time: September 26, 2009, 6:01 pm

Seems to me that a lot of economic wisdom over the past few decades has been directed at eliminating regulations, taxes, social programs, government interference in the economy (for instance, public housing), unions, minimum wages, economic nationalism, etc., etc.

This has all been done to let “markets” rule and to lower expenses for business.

It also had the effect of decimating the consumer side of the economy and continued consumption growth had to be met with increased consumer debt. Aside from debt-financed consumerism and economic development coming from developing countries benefitting from off-shoring of labour and the massive US trade deficit, economic growth in the US had to be based on bubbles in the FIRE sectors.

This was always going to have been unsustainable.

Write a comment

Related articles