But you wouldn’t know it if you listened to the message that the BC Liberals have been sending in this provincial election campaign. Instead of discussing the merits of his party’s proposed economic recovery policy, the incumbent Premier prefers to tell British Columbians that responsible economic stewardship involves keeping the business sector happy and anything that goes against the interests of “employers” (such as increasing the minimum wage, for example) is bad policy. The BC Liberals’ tactic seems to be to market themselves as friends of businesses while portraying the BC NDP as the business sector worst enemy.
This tactic was used in the televised leaders’ debate last weekend, when Mr Campbell remarked:
“When you’re talking about the economy, I think it’s fair to ask the question: Why is there not one major employer group in British Columbia – in mining, in tourism, in forestry – that actually supports the New Democrats’ policies?”
Like most other over-simplified messages, this one is also incorrect. Good economic policy does not mean pandering to business-based interest groups. Yes, lowering business taxes and relaxing workers’ rights makes it easier for firms to reap higher profits, which encourages them to set up locally, creating jobs for the local population and increasing economic growth. However, economic growth alone is not a guarantee that everyone (or even most people) would benefit from the increased prosperity. In BC, we’ve seen this clearly over the last 25 years, when economic growth was strong yet poverty remained largely unchanged and income inequality increased substantially.
Where does this leave us? We need to keep in mind that the whole point of having a strong economy is to benefit society by improving the standard of living of people. We cannot continue to ignore our social and environmental problems in the name of having a strong economy. We need to balance the need of businesses to keep their costs low with the needs of workers to earn enough so that they are able to afford the basics like housing, child care, education to make sure we’re all set on the right path in life.
This does not mean that we have to completely ignore the interests of the business sector. Policy-making in a recession involves some trade offs for sure, but it’s not the all-or-nothing proposition that the BC Liberals are trying to make it.
US President Obama summed it up well on March 10th, when he revealed the first details of his education plan (quoted widely in the media, for example here):
I know there are some who believe we can only handle one challenge at a time [but] we don’t have the luxury of choosing between getting our economy moving now and rebuilding it over the long term.
It’s time for our policy-makers to recognize that tax dollars are not simply a drain of resources from individuals or businesses but can and should be used for productive investments that would make the economy stronger and more sustainable in the future. These investments include building up physical infrastructure, as the current government is doing, but they also include making this infrastructure “green,” which they are not doing (as Marc explains here), as well as building up the social infrastructure we require to ensure that our children are well-educated and prepared to face the challenges of tomorrow.
The current US Administration is doing it. Let’s make sure that those we elect next week in BC do the same.
- The Staple Theory @ 50: Marc Lee (October 20th, 2013)
- Metro Vancouver needs to walk its “zero waste” talk (October 16th, 2013)
- Why the City of Vancouver should divest from fossil fuels (October 9th, 2013)
- What UBC and SMU’s rape chant scandals say about women in the Canadian economy (September 10th, 2013)
- Linda McQuaig for Toronto Centre (August 6th, 2013)