Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Canada’s Fossil-Fuelled Pensions June 22, 2018
    The British Columbia Investment Management Corporation is the steward of BC’s public pensions, but bankrolls companies whose current business models exceed the climate change targets agreed to in the Paris Agreement to which Canada is a signatory. The pensions of over 500,000 British Columbians and assets worth $135 billion are managed by the Corporation—-one of Canada's largest […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Imagine a Winnipeg...2018 Alternative Municipal Budget June 18, 2018
    Climate change; stagnant global economic growth; political polarization; growing inequality.  Our city finds itself dealing with all these issues, and more at once. The 2018 Alternative Municipal Budget (AMB) is a community response that shows how the city can deal with all these issues and balance the budget.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Why would a boom town need charity? Inequities in Saskatchewan’s oil boom and bust May 23, 2018
    When we think of a “boomtown,” we often imagine a formerly sleepy rural town suddenly awash in wealth and economic expansion. It might surprise some to learn that for many municipalities in oil-producing regions in Saskatchewan, the costs of servicing the oil boom can outweigh the benefits. A Prairie Patchwork: Reliance on Oil Industry Philanthropy […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • What are Canada’s energy options in a carbon-constrained world? May 1, 2018
    Canada faces some very difficult choices in maintaining energy security while meeting emissions reduction targets.  A new study by veteran earth scientist David Hughes—published through the Corporate Mapping Project, the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives and the Parkland Institute—is a comprehensive assessment of Canada’s energy systems in light of the need to maintain energy security and […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2018 Living Wage for Metro Vancouver April 25, 2018
    The cost of raising a family in British Columbia increased slightly from 2017 to 2018. A $20.91 hourly wage is needed to cover the costs of raising a family in Metro Vancouver, up from $20.61 per hour in 2017 due to soaring housing costs. This is the hourly wage that two working parents with two young children […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Living on Welfare

The BC office of the CCPA released today a major study about life on welfare for the poorest of the poor. It tracked a cohort of welfare recipients for two years and tells the tales of how they have interacted with a nasty and mean-spirited welfare system, and also the challenges they face as people in getting and holding work when BC is essentially at full-employment. The study reveals the lives of people who, in many cases, are damaged goods, but who should not be thought of as disposable. It also does a good job of telling the stories we need to hear in order to develop some empathy for the lives and struggles of the poorest, who are too often voiceless in today’s society.

Here’s the press release (full study here):

A ground-breaking study that for two years followed British Columbians living on welfare paints a disturbing picture of how people are forced to make ends meet under new welfare rules and low rates. … Living on Welfare in BC: Experiences of Longer-Term “Expected to Work” Recipients followed 62 people from Vancouver, Victoria and Kelowna.

Among the key findings:

  • Much of day-to-day life on welfare is about survival – a constant and frequently unsuccessful struggle to look after basic needs for food, shelter, health and personal safety – making the task of seeking employment hugely difficult if not impossible for many.
  • The study establishes an important connection between welfare rules and homelessness. Throughout the study, almost one third of participants reported having no fixed address at some point in the previous six months.
  • Welfare benefits are too low. What emerges is a welfare system that is structurally dependent on food banks and other charities in order for people to meet basic needs.
  • Far too many people are being cut off of welfare, almost always inappropriately. Seven people in this study were cut off assistance at some point during the two years. Yet none were in fact job-ready, and all struggled with serious addiction and health issues. Once cut off, all lived on virtually no income, were homeless, and most resorted to illegal activities. Cutting these people off is not helping them or society at large.
  • Many people remain inappropriately categorized in the basic “Expected to Work” welfare category for far too long. Many of those in the study were ultimately re-categorized with Person with a Disability (PWD) status or as having other barriers to employment. The good news: these people receive slightly higher benefits. The tragedy is that it took so long for people to be re-categorized – minimally two years, and frequently much longer.
  • A disturbing number of women in the study either returned to or remained in abusive relationships or engaged in prostitution to make ends meet.
  • Only a small fraction of the participants in this study left poverty. Those who remain on assistance remain very poor, even if re-categorized. Those forced off even more so. And while those who shifted from income assistance to the labour market were better off, most are still below the poverty line.

“We focused on people who had been on social assistance for an extended time and who were officially categorized as ‘employable.’ We looked at how they experience the new, tougher work-obligation rules and the hardships they experience,” says Professor Jane Pulkingham, Chair of Sociology and Anthropology at SFU, and co-author of the study.

“This study included many people who never get covered by other studies. As a result, it reveals important new insights about many of society’s most marginalized members,” says Seth Klein, report co-author and director of the CCPA-BC Office.

By following participants for two years, the study was able to compare the experiences of those who stayed on welfare, those who left voluntarily, and those who were cut off of assistance. Students from Simon Fraser University, University of Victoria, and UBC-Okanagan stayed in touch with participants every month, and conducted interviews every 6 months, over the study period.

“The government likes to say declining welfare caseloads is purely a good news story, but it has never done adequate studies that would allow it to make such claims,” says Klein. “So we decided to delve deeper. We wanted to learn more about why people leave assistance, and what happens after they leave.”

Among this study’s policy recommendations are the following:

  • Welfare benefit rates must be significantly increased and indexed to inflation.
  • The government must make a commitment to categorize welfare clients appropriately, and in a timely manner.
  • The regulations and administrative practices that permit people being cut off, even temporarily, must be revisited – they are too arbitrary, are applied inappropriately, and cause unacceptable hardship and harm.
  • More meaningful supports must be provided. If more people are to move from welfare to work, they must be provided with housing, help with addiction and health problems, and a level of individualized education and employment supports that can make this possible.

“We urge the provincial government to change its overarching goals, away from a narrow focus on welfare caseload reduction, and move instead to the broader goals of poverty reduction and elimination, and health promotion,” concludes Pulkingham.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Carefulspider
Time: June 9, 2008, 2:22 pm

Thanks for the insightful article. Having had to resort to welfare from time to time, it really is just geared for “basic” survival and for many it can be a revolving door because the only employment available without degrees or certificates are temporary or very low paying part time service industry jobs.

I think it would be the best investment to open doors for higher education so the poverty trap can be beaten once and for all.

There should also be better support systems for the mentally ill or those with addiction problems. Homelessness only excaberates these issues.

Comment from tina lagrotteria
Time: July 15, 2008, 12:54 am

I want to see people on welfare receiving
more income support for shelter and
support. They are not receiving enough money
and there is alot of evidence to show this fact.

No one should be cut off this is cruel and
inhumane.

I have observed a better attitude towards
people on Welfare and it is thanks to people
who are standing up and speaking up.

I think for a long time no one spoke up but
now the Ministry must have realized everyone
has Rights under our Canadian Constitution.

The arbitrary system fights with people, and
people fight back. This is what they want,
and they enjoy it. This is very childish and
the clients no longer want any part of it.
They have the Right to Peace in their lives.
They have had fun fighting with everyone on
the system for years. Unpleasant and
mean system. What do you think it does to
people. People who need help, and be
friendly that means all the staff and don’t
think yourself too smart, some people are
alot brighter than you who are on welfare.
You never know who you are talking too!!!

It is the policies that need to change, glasses
are costly and people receive about $114.00
for a pair, glasses today in 2008 cost from
$250.00 to $300.00 and this has not increased.
What are you waiting for???

Dental Care should be paid in full by the Minister
where that client has Zero dollors to disbourse
out of his own pocket. Not enough money!!!

People with Disabilities do receive enough money
per month to meet all their needs. Many
have special needs not covered, plus need
help with grocery shopping, housekeeping,
washing, and so on. Raise their rates
and not by $50.00, the $50.00 amount
is what they call HELP, that is crap, it’s
saying here is what I am giving you, that’s it
not my problem. Not a good way to help people.

Finally, do what you should of done years ago,
raise the rates. Richmond said NO!!!
He knows what he wants…but he doesn’t
want to know what these people really need.

I wonder what Coleman thinks, likely the
same old mode of thinking. It’s unfortunate
but I really believe that the next generation of
brighter persons will do a much better job
at helping all people on welfare.

The stereotyping about people on Welfare
is garbage, people on welfare are good people.
Yeah, there are people with big issues like
drugs, alcohol, and this exists also amoung the
Rich and Wealthy, so shut up!!!

Write a comment





Related articles