Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • CCPA in Europe for CETA speaking tour October 17, 2017
    On September 21, Canada and the European Union announced that the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA), a controversial NAFTA-plus free trade deal initiated by the Harper government and signed by Prime Minister Trudeau in 2016, was now provisionally in force. In Europe, however, more than 20 countries have yet to officially ratify the deal, […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Twelve year study of an inner-city neighbourhood October 12, 2017
    What does twelve years of community organizing look like for a North End Winnipeg neighbourhood?  Jessica Leigh survey's those years with the Dufferin community from a community development lens.  Read full report.
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Losing your ID - even harder to recover when you have limited resources! October 10, 2017
    Ellen Smirl researched the barriers experienced by low-income Manitobans when faced with trying to replace lost, stolen, or never aquired idenfication forms. Read full report here.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA recommendations for a better North American trade model October 6, 2017
    The all-party House of Commons trade committee is consulting Canadians on their priorities for bilateral and trilateral North American trade in light of the current renegotiation of NAFTA. In the CCPA’s submission to this process, Scott Sinclair, Stuart Trew, and Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood argue for a different kind of trading relationship that is inclusive, transformative, and […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Ontario’s fair wage policy needs to be refreshed September 28, 2017
    The Ontario government is consulting on ways to modernize the province’s fair wage policy, which sets standards for wages and working conditions for government contract workers such as building cleaners, security guards, building trades and construction workers. The fair wage policy hasn’t been updated since 1995, but the labour market has changed dramatically since then. […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

The Bank of Canada and my mortgage

I have to renew my mortgage in a couple of weeks, but am wrestling with whether to go with a fixed or variable rate. A few months ago, when my credit union called, they guaranteed me a 5.8% fixed rate for three years, with the caveat that if rates went down by the time the current term expired they would give me the lower rate. I said a tentative yes, and this seemed like a good idea as Bank of Canada raised rates a couple of weeks later.

But then the turmoil in financial markets hit, and those jitters have served to somewhat derail the Bank’s obsession with fighting inflation by raising rates. Today’s announcement from the Bank that they are keeping the overnight rate unchanged is indicative of this, when previously everyone (Bank staff included, I’m guessing) had figured on a quarter-point increase.

It would be better for me to go for a variable rate if conditions in the financial markets worsen and the outlook is for a drop in interest rates. My credit union offers a variable rate mortgage, currently at 6.0%, that essentially moves in line with the Bank of Canada’s overnight rate. Back in 2001 we went this path and for three years rode it to ultra-low interest rates, bottoming out at 2.25%. But I would need at least one quarter-point rate cut to make it worthwhile, and it would have to stay below for three years.

On the other hand, it may be that the turmoil in the markets is going to pass, that there will be minimal spillover onto the real economy (as Jim Stanford argues), and the Bank will get back to its hawkish ways. In this case the fixed rate is a better bet to guard against rate increases. In 2004, we went this path and locked in for three years at 4.3%. Given the past six years, a rate close to 6% seems awfully high even though it is still low compared to the 1980s and 1990s.

So, professional and armchair economists, your turn. What path should I take?

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from Green Assassin Brigade
Time: September 5, 2007, 10:37 am

It’s my belief that the Fed will have no choice but to try to reinflate the U.S. economy and will do so by aggressively cutting interest rates and drowning the market with liquidity. Canada is in no position to be above par with the U.S. dollar, we rely too much on their business, lower rates and higher monetary creation will weaken the U.S. dollar even further and the BoC will have no choice but to hold or cut in response to any lowering of the U.S. Prime rate.

If you can hold off signing until the next Fed meeting I think I would. If they hold then they are serious about inflation and will let the financial industry take its lumps, sign long term fixed. If they blink and go lower, especially if they go 50pts lower I’d take the long variable.

I’d also go variable if I could not wait out the Fed decision. Bernanke’s belief that too little, not too much liquidity caused the Depression means he will risk inflation and more bubbles to prove his theory.

Comment from Saskboy
Time: September 5, 2007, 11:21 am

I just did prime – .9%. But this is my first time/try 🙂

Comment from Dave
Time: September 5, 2007, 12:15 pm

We are leading into a US presidential election year. That, and what GAB above offered, should see interest rates fall. I personally don’t see interest rates rising significantly for at least three years. Canada, as much as the BoC says their sole job is to fight inflation, also has to do something to reduce the value of the Loony and the only way to do that is make it less attractive.

Too bad. For once I’m in a position want higher interest rates. That alone is an omen. When I was paying off a mortgage interest rates skyrocketed. I survived that and eventually turned my balance into nice solid black with interest rates that are somewhere between low and pathetic.

Comment from Greg Hamilton
Time: September 5, 2007, 6:59 pm

It depends. How big is your mortgage and what are the interest costs associated with both options?

i.e. What is the benefit or cost of making a decision?

Comment from recceptl
Time: September 24, 2007, 10:34 am

Interest rates are on the way down in the US and thus here. If you have not locked in yet, try to get a Home Equity Line of Credit. You can carry your mortgage debt there and lock it in anytime.

Comment from Marc Lee
Time: September 24, 2007, 11:01 am

In the end, I went with the variable rate, which I got at a larger discount than I thought when I wrote the post — 5.65% or 15 basis points lower than the fixed rate. I can move to a fixed rate mortgage at any time for an $85 fee.

My thinking was that following the 50 bp drop in the US federal rate and much uncertainty on the horizon that the likelihood is now greater for Canadian rates to go down rather than up. And with the latest CPI numbers coming in at a modest 1.7% month-over-month, and a high dollar to contend with, this ought to make the inflation hawks at the Bank of Canada settle down a bit.

We shall see.

Comment from Patrick
Time: August 24, 2009, 9:52 am

I wonder what you choice was after all… if you went with variable in 2007, i’m thinking you’re a happy camper!

Here’s our rates in Canada…

Comment from Marc Lee
Time: August 25, 2009, 12:53 pm

I did go variable and currently am paying a sweet 1.65%.

Comment from Stephen Northcott
Time: December 8, 2009, 10:14 am

You can get 3.69% on a 5 year fixed through Valueland Mortgages at http://www.valueland.ca. I had a positive experience with them and got P-0.9% variable mortgage when the best I could find elsewhere was P-0.65%.

Write a comment





Related articles