Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada July 9, 2019
    CCPA senior economist David Macdonald co-authored a new report, Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada­—released by Upstream Institute in partnership with the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)—tracks child poverty rates using Census 2006, the 2011 National Household Survey and Census 2016. The report is available for […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Fossil-Power Top 50 launched July 3, 2019
    What do Suncor, Encana, the Royal Bank of Canada, the Fraser Institute and 46 other companies and organizations have in common? They are among the entities that make up the most influential fossil fuel industry players in Canada. Today, the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP) is drawing attention to these powerful corporations and organizations with the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Tickets available for Errol Black Chair Fundraising Brunch 2019 June 26, 2019
    You are invited to CCPA-MB’s annual fundraising brunch in support of the Errol Black Chair in Labour Issues.  Please join us to honour: Honoured Guest: John Loxley is Professor of Economics at the University of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Guest Speaker:  Jim Stanford is Economist and Director of the Centre […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The fight against ISDS in Romania June 24, 2019
    CCPA is proud to co-sponsor this terrific video from our colleagues at Corporate Europe Observatory. It chronicles grassroots resistance to efforts by Canadian mining company Gabriel Resources to build Europe’s largest open-pit gold mine in a culturally rich and environmentally sensitive region of Romania. After this unimaginably destructive project was refused by the Romanian public and courts, the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Private Equity and Casino Capitalism 

Brussels, 21 June 2007: Launching a new report “Where the house always wins, Private Equity, Hedge Funds and the new Casino Capitalism” the world’s peak trade union body, the 168 million-member International Trade Union Confederation (ITUC), today issued a global warning to pension funds over investment in private equity and hedge funds. At its biannual General Council meeting, top trade union leaders from around the world adopted a resolution calling on pension funds and other investors of workers’ capital to exercise caution over such investments until governments deal with a host of regulatory, transparency, taxation and sustainability issues.

Pension funds today provide more than 25% of private equity capital, but such highly leveraged investments are high-risk, don’t necessarily generate better long-term returns than other investments, and frequently have negative impacts on employment, wages and working conditions. Managers of private equity firms, some of whom receive tens or even hundreds of millions of dollars in income each year, are also in many cases paying tax at rates well below ordinary workers.

“The ITUC is advising pension trustees and managers to take extreme care with these casino funds. Contrary to the hype, they can bring substantial risks and in the long term many such funds have performed well below expectations. The real winners are the private equity and hedge fund managers – while investors, and workers employed by companies targeted for leveraged buy-outs, have no such guarantees. The retirement incomes of millions of workers are at stake, and the future for these funds is much less rosy than they would have us believe”, said ITUC General Secretary Guy Ryder.

While some funds have been prepared to negotiate agreements with the unions which cover workers employed by take-over targets, the large majority of buy-outs provide no protection for employment levels, wages and working conditions. In one of several cases highlighted in the report, the private equity owners of KB Toys who had invested just US$ 18.1 million of their own money, used a ‘dividend recap’ to pay themselves and several company executives some US$ 120 million. Shortly after, the company filed for bankruptcy protection and nearly one-third of its workers lost their jobs.

“With leveraged buy-outs reaching US$730 billion last year, the threat to short term stability and longer term sustainability in the global economy is real and cannot be ignored. It is just a matter of time until one of these massive transactions turns sour, and even a modest change in global economic conditions such as a significant rise in interest rates could lead to a cascade of collapsing deals, jeopardising hundreds of thousands of jobs worldwide. In addition to the dire consequences for workers, the macro-economic effects of this would be disastrous” said Ken Georgetti, Chair of the ITUC Workers’ Capital Committee and President of the Canadian Labour Congress. “The secretive nature of these funds should give us all concern”, he added.

With Denmark estimating that it stands to lose 25% of its corporate tax revenues due to private equity and hedge fund activity if it takes no action, countries around the world are facing dramatic falls in already declining company tax income, posing new threats to public services and social protection. The report describes how, due to aggressive tax-minimisation schemes, taxpayers are in effect subsidising the activities of hedge funds and private equity, and thus the incomes of some of the world’s richest people.

“Until regulators deal properly with the issues of transparency, regulation, taxation and protection for the victims of ‘buy it, flip it, strip it’ behaviour, pension funds should remain on high alert over unsustainable investments and avoid committing workers’ retirement incomes to them, especially where private equity and hedge fund managers refuse to negotiate with unions and agree on protection for the employees of companies which are being bought-out. There are funds which have reached agreements with trade unions, and others should follow this positive example”, concluded Ryder.

Noting that any voluntary measures adopted by private equity and hedge funds are unlikely to solve the problem, the new ITUC report sets out a series of detailed recommendations for regulation of them:

  Transparency; including reporting of assets by private equity, a harmonised international framework to cover hedge fund activities and reporting requirements for companies taken off stock markets into private hands;

  Financial stability and risk; including limits on the levels of ‘leverage’ in transactions to reduce the risk of bankruptcy, increased oversight on private equity, and enhanced monitoring of the use of ‘derivatives’ by hedge funds;

  Taxation; including limits on tax deductions for interest payments, removing the ‘carried interest’ tax loophole for fund managers, changes to rules concerning tax ‘offshoring’ and increased capital gains tax on short-term arbitrage deals;

  Measures to protect public services and utilities from the possible negative effects of leveraged buy-outs;

  Corporate governance; including stronger measures to prevent conflicts of interest and employee- and investor-safeguards, reform of voting rights in listed companies, and limitations on withdrawal of liquid assets, capital maintenance provisions, and requirements to report on the social impact of transactions; and,

  Workers’ rights; including information and consultation provisions, rules concerning continuity of employment entitlements when companies are sold, and enhanced frameworks to protect workers’ rights and promote social dialogue to restrain the ruthless cost-cutting typical of leveraged buy-outs.

Write a comment

Related articles