Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • Rental Wage in Canada July 18, 2019
    Our new report maps rental affordability in neighbourhoods across Canada by calculating the “rental wage,” which is the hourly wage needed to afford an average apartment without spending more than 30% of one’s earnings.  Across all of Canada, the average wage needed to afford a two-bedroom apartment is $22.40/h, or $20.20/h for an average one […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada July 9, 2019
    CCPA senior economist David Macdonald co-authored a new report, Towards Justice: Tackling Indigenous Child Poverty in Canada­—released by Upstream Institute in partnership with the Assembly of First Nations (AFN) and the Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives (CCPA)—tracks child poverty rates using Census 2006, the 2011 National Household Survey and Census 2016. The report is available for […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Fossil-Power Top 50 launched July 3, 2019
    What do Suncor, Encana, the Royal Bank of Canada, the Fraser Institute and 46 other companies and organizations have in common? They are among the entities that make up the most influential fossil fuel industry players in Canada. Today, the Corporate Mapping Project (CMP) is drawing attention to these powerful corporations and organizations with the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Tickets available for Errol Black Chair Fundraising Brunch 2019 June 26, 2019
    You are invited to CCPA-MB’s annual fundraising brunch in support of the Errol Black Chair in Labour Issues.  Please join us to honour: Honoured Guest: John Loxley is Professor of Economics at the University of Manitoba and a Fellow of the Royal Society of Canada. Guest Speaker:  Jim Stanford is Economist and Director of the Centre […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The fight against ISDS in Romania June 24, 2019
    CCPA is proud to co-sponsor this terrific video from our colleagues at Corporate Europe Observatory. It chronicles grassroots resistance to efforts by Canadian mining company Gabriel Resources to build Europe’s largest open-pit gold mine in a culturally rich and environmentally sensitive region of Romania. After this unimaginably destructive project was refused by the Romanian public and courts, the […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

My call with the Senator

Out of the blue yesterday I got a call from the Chair of the Senate Committee on Banking, Trade and Commerce, Jerahmiel S. Grafstein. An honour, I suppose, because he was personally inviting me to testify before the committee on interprovincial trade barriers. I was somewhat caught by surprise and had no idea who he was (turns out he’s a Liberal, who was appointed by Trudeau!) when he launched into a tirade about how there were lots of them, that they were one of the reasons holding back Canadian productivity, and that TILMA was the greatest thing since Viagra (OK, he didn’t actually say Viagra).

Apparently, he has not read my work on the topic and I told him I disagreed but would be happy to participate any way I could. I could barely get a word in after that. The Senator can talk! He admitted that he only had anecdotes, some on labour mobility, one on the need for national corporate registration, and one on the need for a national securities regulator (a good idea though a couple hours later I noticed that Alberta Premier Ed Stelmach says no way). He then meandered over to the need for upgraded border crossings with the US (he makes a compelling case but this of course has nothing to do with interprovincial trade).

Being opposed to TILMA does not mean opposing any efforts to remove real barriers if they exist. The Senate Committee should compile a list of real barriers, ensure that addressing them would not adversely affect public interest regulation, and start a process for dealing with them. There are also areas of provincial jurisdiction that could be uploaded to the federal government (if the provinces would only agree). Some of these issues are just modernizing federalism rather than “interprovincial trade barriers”.
This should not be controversial, but nor would it be a magic bullet for Canada’s productivity. I pointed out that the MacDonald Commission found that barriers back in amounted to 0.05% of Canada’s GDP, and that since the Agreement on Internal Trade had reduced most of that. He thought that MacDonald was missing some things, but even if that is correct, and we doubled the MacDonald Commission estimate and forgot the AIT altogether, we are still talking small change.

I did not have time to get into the details on how Canadian provinces trade more with each other than with US states, nor did I cover the recent trends that show faster interprovincial than international trade. And I only got in about two words about how TILMA undermines public interest regulation. So I will have to save those remarks for my presentation to the Senate committee.

Comments

Comment from janfromthebruce
Time: May 3, 2007, 10:29 am

Good luck, sounds like the liberal senator is all about what is good for business, is good for workers anology. Sign

Write a comment





Related articles