Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • The 2018 Living Wage for Metro Vancouver April 25, 2018
    The cost of raising a family in British Columbia increased slightly from 2017 to 2018. A $20.91 hourly wage is needed to cover the costs of raising a family in Metro Vancouver, up from $20.61 per hour in 2017 due to soaring housing costs. This is the hourly wage that two working parents with two young children […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Mobility pricing must be fair and equitable for all April 12, 2018
    As Metro Vancouver’s population has grown, so have its traffic congestion problems. Whether it’s a long wait to cross a bridge or get on a bus, everyone can relate to the additional time and stress caused by a transportation system under strain. Mobility pricing is seen as a solution to Metro Vancouver’s transportation challenges with […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Budget 2018: The Most Disappointing Budget Ever March 14, 2018
    Premier Pallister’s Trump-esque statement that budget 2018 was going to be the “best budget ever” has fallen a bit flat. Instead of a bold plan to deal with climate change, poverty and our crumbling infrastructure, we are presented with two alarmist scenarios to justify further tax cuts and a lack of decisive action: the recent […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2018 Federal Budget Analysis February 14, 2018
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis Some baby steps for dad and big steps forward for women, by Kate McInturff (CCPA) An ambition constrained budget, by David Macdonald (CCPA) Five things […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CED in Manitoba - The Video January 29, 2018
    Community Economic Development in Manitoba - nudging capitalism out of the way?
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers

Meta

Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Canada’s Incredible Shrinking Government

I recently had occasion to re-read Jim Stanford’s contribution to an excellent CCPA book on Paul Martin’s Record (Hell and High Water), in which Jim pointed out that fiscal retrenchment in Canada under the Chretien government had been far, far more severe than the OECD norm.

Few Canadians seem to perceive just how exceptional Canada has been compared to the international norm in terms of the ongoing tilt to spending cuts and tax cuts – even if we compare ourselves to the US. The trend has continued, even after the period of deficit fighting has ended.

Consider the following – drawn from Annex Data Tables 25 and 26 in the most recent OECD Economic Outlook.

Total Canadian government revenues have fallen by almost 4 percentage points of GDP, from a peak of 44.2% of GDP in 1992 to an estimated 40.5% of GDP in 2006. Over the same period, total government revenues actually rose slightly as a percentage of GDP in the OECD area as a whole (from 37.8% to 38.6% of GDP), in the Euro area, and even in the US (from 32.8% to 34.2% of GDP.)

Total government spending in Canada has fallen by an astonishing more than 10 percentage points of GDP, from a (recession-bloated) high of 53.3% in 1992 to an estimated 39.5% of GDP in 2006. For the OECD as a whole, the decrease was far, far smaller – from 42.4% in 1992 to 40.6% in 2006. Spending cuts in Canada have been much deeper than in the US (where total spending has fallen from 38.5% of GDP in 1992 to 36.5% in 2006.)

We on the left often like to think of Canada as somehow intermediate between the US and European social democratic “models.” Yet, when it comes to the basic fiscal hydraulics of tax and spend which support decent social programs and public services, we have tilted decisively to the US low tax/low spending side of the spectrum. And this cannot be attributed to the need for fiscal consolidation and dealing with the high deficits of the early 1990s.

Since 1997 – when the federal government’s deficit was eliminated and the provinces had moved much closer to balance – total Canadian government spending has fallen by about 4 percentage points of GDP to finance an equally large reduction of fiscal capacity. (Spending fell from 44.3% to 39.6% of GDP, while total government receipts fell from 44.5% to 40.5% of GDP, 1997-2006.) Believe it or not, total government spending in the US actually rose over this period, and taxes fell only slightly.

Canada’s levels of taxation and expenditure used to be not too distant from the European norm. We have, however, converged decisively with the US over the past decade, mainly because our governments have cut taxes and slashed programs with much greater resolve than has been shown even South of the border.

Enjoy and share:

Comments

Comment from <![CDATA[Erin Weir]]>
Time: January 3, 2007, 1:41 pm

Yes. To connect this post with mine on Dion-omics, it is important to recognize that Harper’s fiscal policy of tax cuts and constricted public spending is a continuation of the Chretien/Martin pattern.

Pingback from <![CDATA[My Blahg » SHRINKING GOVERNMENT, CRUMBLING INFRASTRUCTURE]]>
Time: January 3, 2007, 3:25 pm

[…] Relentlessly Progressive Economics has the ugly statistics. Total Canadian government revenues have fallen by almost 4 percentage points of GDP, from a peak of 44.2% of GDP in 1992 to an estimated 40.5% of GDP in 2006. Over the same period, total government revenues actually rose slightly as a percentage of GDP in the OECD area as a whole (from 37.8% to 38.6% of GDP), in the Euro area, and even in the US (from 32.8% to 34.2% of GDP.) […]

Comment from Red
Time: May 26, 2011, 4:36 pm

Wonderful! Keep shrinking that government!

Write a comment





Related articles