Main menu:

History of RPE Thought

Posts by Tag

RSS New from the CCPA

  • A critical look at BC’s new tax breaks and subsidies for LNG May 7, 2019
    The BC government has offered much more to the LNG industry than the previous government. Read the report by senior economist Marc Lee.  
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver April 30, 2019
    The 2019 living wage for Metro Vancouver is $19.50/hour. This is the amount needed for a family of four with each of two parents working full-time at this hourly rate to pay for necessities, support the healthy development of their children, escape severe financial stress and participate in the social, civic and cultural lives of […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • Time to regulate gas prices in BC and stop industry gouging April 29, 2019
    Drivers in Metro Vancouver are reeling from record high gas prices, and many commentators are blaming taxes. But it’s not taxes causing pain at the pump — it’s industry gouging. Our latest research shows that gas prices have gone up by 55 cents per litre since 2016 — and the vast majority of that increase […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • CCPA welcomes Randy Robinson as new Ontario Director March 27, 2019
    The Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives is pleased to announce the appointment of Randy Robinson as the new Director of our Ontario Office.  Randy’s areas of expertise include public sector finance, the gendered rise of precarious work, neoliberalism, and labour rights. He has extensive experience in communications and research, and has been engaged in Ontario’s […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
  • 2019 Federal Budget Analysis February 27, 2019
    Watch this space for response and analysis of the federal budget from CCPA staff and our Alternative Federal Budget partners. More information will be added as it is available. Commentary and Analysis  Aim high, spend low: Federal budget 2019 by David MacDonald (CCPA) Budget 2019 fiddles while climate crisis looms by Hadrian Mertins-Kirkwood (CCPA) Budget hints at priorities for upcoming […]
    Canadian Centre for Policy Alternatives
Progressive Bloggers


Recent Blog Posts

Posts by Author

Recent Blog Comments

The Progressive Economics Forum

Bubble seeks air

This makes me nervous:

Mortgages getting risky: CIBC

Globe and Mail Update

TORONTO — Household credit is stable, but that statement masks the growing popularity of untraditional and risky mortgages, a new study by CIBC World Markets says.

Household credit is growing steadily at an 11-per-cent annual pace, pushed by a 10.9-per-cent rise in residential mortgages for year ending in April 2006, according to the report.

Growing by 11% per year is not exactly stable. The catch is that household incomes are not rising by 11% per year. According to Statscan’s Incomes in Canada, median total income for Canadian families was $63,100 in 2004 (last data year), or about $800 higher than in 2001, after adjusting for inflation which has been in the 2-3% range over most of this period. 2005 and 2006 may have been good years but I doubt that incomes have gone up 20% in nominal terms. This means debt loads are getting heavier as people buy into the real estate boom.

It says non-bank mortgage providers took a bigger share of that growing market. Banks account for about 75 per cent of the mortgage market, but they only saw their mortgages outstanding grow by 4.3 per cent in the past six months. Non-traditional lenders, on the other hand, saw a 9.1 per cent gain in their mortgages outstanding.

This is a sign of a “maturing and more dynamic mortgage market,” the report says, as non-traditional lenders compete with banks by offering American-style sub-prime loans, increased amortization periods or interest-rate-only mortgages.

The power of low interest rates is to make you able to carry a larger mortgage for the same level of income. But interest rates are now back up: the bank rate was 4.5% in May, the same rate as in July 2001, or just before 9/11 led to a huge drop in short-term rates. Mind you, the rate was 6% as of December 2000, and post 9/11 hit a low of 2.25% by early 2002.

Nonetheless, the central bank has effectively taken away the punch bowl, as they say. How painful will the hangover be?

Long-term rates never fell that much, either, as most of the action was in short-term rates. Five-year rates fell by about one percentage point from the first half of 2001 to the first half of 2002.

Alas, the meme of “low interest rates” is still out there and this psychology is still affecting the real estate market.

The advent of American-style loans will keep the party going but the danger for buyers right now is getting locked into large mortgages that will deplete their purchasing power elsewhere in their household budget. And if unemployment goes back up to the 8-10% range, look out for some people to just walk away from their mortgages.

Enjoy and share:


Comment from Peter
Time: July 21, 2006, 2:37 pm

Thanks for the post above. It helps me immensely in the research that I am carrying out.
I am a realtor myself and follow most of the posts with regard to Real Estate Boom.
In most of the posts, there are spins on demographics and interest rate.
Historically, the ratio of housing price to annual income
has been 2.1, with very little variation. In many parts of the country, this ratio is now approaching 10.5!
Our stock/housing pattern appears remarkably similar to the one Japan had 20 years ago. First the stock market busted.
Right after, the real estate market rallied, and it busted too
It is my belief that there is a wider human psychology involved and people are feeding on the basic fear and greed
Your Miami Realtor

Write a comment

Related articles